Why are so many projects still making tokens with such large supply?

[Henrobakkara]

This has often been my question so far
We all know that if a project has a small supply, the price will be very expensive in the exchange, but why are so many new projects still making trillions of supply? do those who have a large supply don't want expensive token prices in the market?
Are they too greedy so that make a large supply?

[kindbtc]

This has often been my question so far
We all know that if a project has a small supply, the price will be very expensive in the exchange, but why are so many new projects still making trillions of supply? do those who have a large supply don't want expensive token prices in the market?
Are they too greedy so that make a large supply?

Yes the total and circulating supply should be reasonable and realistic because creating billions of valueless tokens does not make sense, usually this is done due to fear of dump because the token value is already so cheap that any dumps will not let it look small while the gains could look big percentage wise.

[jrrsparkles]

This has often been my question so far
We all know that if a project has a small supply, the price will be very expensive in the exchange, but why are so many new projects still making trillions of supply? do those who have a large supply don't want expensive token prices in the market?
Are they too greedy so that make a large supply?

More the supply then less the price per unit will be so making the total supply into trillions is the project's devs choice and it doesn't literally means they were about to make more money because if the project is shit then they are not going to make anything no matter what is their total supply value is.

[AmoreJaz]

This has often been my question so far
We all know that if a project has a small supply, the price will be very expensive in the exchange, but why are so many new projects still making trillions of supply? do those who have a large supply don't want expensive token prices in the market?
Are they too greedy so that make a large supply?

Yes the total and circulating supply should be reasonable and realistic because creating billions of valueless tokens does not make sense, usually this is done due to fear of dump because the token value is already so cheap that any dumps will not let it look small while the gains could look big percentage wise.

you have a point on that. also, in case if the team has the intention of running away later on, if they will allot themselves even small percentage of their total supply, they can still get a good amount of money if they dump their holdings. as such, they will have the reason to say that they only have small allocation so there's no worry that they will disappear. but the truth is, they don't care how much they will create for their total supply as long as they can cash out some of their coins and be gone.

[articlecity]

This has often been my question so far
We all know that if a project has a small supply, the price will be very expensive in the exchange, but why are so many new projects still making trillions of supply? do those who have a large supply don't want expensive token prices in the market?
Are they too greedy so that make a large supply?

Yeah, the tokenomics should be clear and according to the needs and should give a serious and professional look to the project as creating trillions in supply can make a project look like joke so personally i do not like new projects with kind of unlimited supply.

[Tstar]

I don't find any logic behind those decisions too. Tokenomics of most project is just wrong. It's very rare to see a balanced supply. Usually, supply is polarized from trillions to 'scarcity' low.

Maybe the solution would be some site with authority in the field to write a guide on How to create a proper tokenomic?

[Eddyc]

In my opinion it's to offer to populous countries like China, India, Brazil or to ensure that each investor can have a considerable amount of the project. However, for this strategy to work, the investment fund has to be huge at least initially to generate price leverage and generate demand. Another interesting aspect is the community that can ensure this gigantic supply by generating armor and strengthening demand, but few projects have achieved this.

[jossiel]

This has often been my question so far
We all know that if a project has a small supply, the price will be very expensive in the exchange, but why are so many new projects still making trillions of supply? do those who have a large supply don't want expensive token prices in the market?
Are they too greedy so that make a large supply?

The low supply capped tokens started with the Yearn.Finance and other Defi projects followed them to have a low supply but not all of them as successful as YFI.

But during the ICO period, too many altcoins have large supply because it seems to be effective to them. Just like as XRP and Ethereum but it doesn't really make sense if the project has a high or low supply. What matters with them is the demand and its usage.

Whether they have billions or 10,000 supply in circulation or on its economy but if it doesn't have real use, it's a useless token. Demand and use is what really matters.

[Swopon]

I am not happy with large supply. Few days back, You engine project has same scenario and most of the tokens are now huge supply. Their tokenomics are not good and the circulating supply should be limited and more realistic with the market demand. Because, quantity can't make your quality.

[kidbounty]

This has often been my question so far
We all know that if a project has a small supply, the price will be very expensive in the exchange, but why are so many new projects still making trillions of supply? do those who have a large supply don't want expensive token prices in the market?
Are they too greedy so that make a large supply?

it's all about the original goal of that project. if only for investment it is very profitable if made with a small max supply. look at today's Defi project, the max supply they have is a little on average. large max supply looks greedy but if the initial purpose of the token was for utility on the platform. large max supply can help to prevent scarcity and make it more stable.

[shinratensei_]

I am not happy with large supply. Few days back, You engine project has same scenario and most of the tokens are now huge supply. Their tokenomics are not good and the circulating supply should be limited and more realistic with the market demand. Because, quantity can't make your quality.

The total supply didn't give a significant impact on the price and did you see how ripple has 100 billion as its maximum supply?
The dev could take advantage of putting more supply rather than use the low supply. Imagine when they have been using a very high price as the start price to trade their tokens and then the dev gets more pre-mined coins from there.  The dev itself was taking the benefit from taking the big supply.

[yazher]

This has often been my question so far
We all know that if a project has a small supply, the price will be very expensive in the exchange, but why are so many new projects still making trillions of supply? do those who have a large supply don't want expensive token prices in the market?
Are they too greedy so that make a large supply?

Those tokens want to liquefy their supply throughout the crypto market even though the price won't even reach up to $1 in the future like what we have seen with Ripples and its like. Now, this is some problem for those people because doing such things required them a huge amount of money and they also need some popularity. That's why we can see right now that those tokens that have huge supplies have not been successful these recent years except for a few.

[DoubleAweSeven]

It's easy to pump and dump this kind of coins. It's also easy to buy it because you wouldn't be buying cents but instead a whole coin, imagine the hassle buying 0.0003 something coin, it would be confusing for me. That's why there's so many of them because of this traits.

[KaratX]

Large supply isn't bad as far as the token use case fits in with the large supply, Ethereum is the second best crypto project and it has no exact max supply till today, max supply had nothing to do with the success of a project, what the team have in store is what will determine the success of any new project today

[btc_angela]

This has often been my question so far
We all know that if a project has a small supply, the price will be very expensive in the exchange, but why are so many new projects still making trillions of supply? do those who have a large supply don't want expensive token prices in the market?
Are they too greedy so that make a large supply?

It's because that's one way to attract investors, they can say that they are going to have a burn token process in the future, so that token could be worth let's say in a year or two. And I guess it's the norm though, projects created trillions of supply now and just hope that investors will suddenly pour their money on them. I've seen projects with trillion of supply being successful, so I guess there's nothing wrong with that kind of strategy.

[Maxre]

maybe that question should be asked directly to the project in question, my assumption about the total supply of the new project is to maintain the stability of the coin so that it doesn't easily dump when it is on the market.

[poodle63]

There are many reasons actually and as far as I know some of them are to create the illusion that the coin is affordable by having lower price and probably trying to pump the market cap hoping that price times total supply exceeds its former market cap.
I personally have no problem with that if the projects didn't intend to create new tokens or minting new tokens. It's only problem if the devs is minting like crazy while investor doesn't get their deserved share.

[takngantuk]

because from the start they only thought about money. if indeed they are serious about developing a project, they should be able to consider this. A large max supply can also reduce the trust of investors, especially if unsold tokens or coins are not burned. obviously it will end up as a shit project. so forget a project like this.

[shoreno]

This has often been my question so far
We all know that if a project has a small supply, the price will be very expensive in the exchange, but why are so many new projects still making trillions of supply? do those who have a large supply don't want expensive token prices in the market?
Are they too greedy so that make a large supply?

More the supply then less the price per unit will be so making the total supply into trillions is the project's devs choice and it doesn't literally means they were about to make more money because if the project is shit then they are not going to make anything no matter what is their total supply value is.

thats what im thinking too . if their goal is to make money why they create a coin with huge supply but there are actually coins that are not shit but have a huge supply and afaik a few of them are on the top list but the mostly the primary goal of those coin creators are not for the profit .

also most  investors nowadays dont really care if what thier investing and will mostly grab low supply coins , they love shitcoins because they think it was a gem for them to get rich quick .

[cilgindansci]

Cryptocurrencies are very famous right now and at such times greedy pops up. Everyone wants to earn a lot with little effort. I think we should turn to large volume and reliable cryptocurrencies.