Need some help to Understand Bounty campaign

[nicecrypto]

@op already got himself red tag for not reading Forum rules or just break them without care because according to red tag reference this users is tag as ' ban evasion ' which means @op is not new to the forum and he is well aware of bounties and rules

[goinmerry]

There are so many bounty campaign that moderate by newbie with 2/3 activities, is that kind of bounty are safe and believable?

Mind giving us some links as examples? Not browsing much at the bounty section. Not because they are newbies, we can conclude right away that they are untrustworthy.

If I'm in the situation:

- If those are part of the team, then check the project if it's somehow "promising".
- If those are users here in the forum then got hired by a project to become their bounty manager, I will think twice as in the first place, why a newbie with less activity should manage a bounty without experience.

[zonefloor]

actually they are not linked to award managers. I have participated in many award programs led by new and legendary members. But while neither of them paid, I sometimes made money from both. This could all be about the scope of the project and the money it raises.

[Koutami]

There are so many bounty campaign that moderate by newbie with 2/3 activities, is that kind of bounty are safe and believable?

Do you believe the manager with 2/3 activities? Im absolutely will not do any kind of that bounty, just search more reliable manager that already proved can handle some bounty before.

[Wulan_maniez]

It is very doubtful to see newbies with 2-3 activities, for that I rarely participate in their bounty projects.
But not all newbie accounts are dubious in their handling of bounties project. For example, Small Rabbit
and Bounty Detective, they pay well and their projects are good. So for managers with starter accounts,
I trust them more than others.

[magnum cyber]

It depends, because there are also new projects and also managed by a new account from the project team itself. btw for me whatever it depends on the project, if I think it's feasible then I'll follow. maybe for the start I will try 1 week if the performance is good in managing the bounty campaign etc., then I will stay and vice versa. My advice is to be smart in choosing a bounty campaign.

[JahriMeayer]

Can't say surely cause sometimes team members themselves open newbie account with low activity and start promoting their project on this platform.but as i exprienced, you are right. I saw most of bounty end with scam which is posted by newbie manager with 2/3 activity.although that isn't means all newbie manager are try to scam! Some are good also.its your responsibility to check and find out the right one

[Nellayar]

There are so many bounty campaign that moderate by newbie with 2/3 activities, is that kind of bounty are safe and believable?

If I were you, I would not focus much in bounty campaigns. Only few are good and genuine bounties. It is not already same as 2017 wherein bounties are really paid campaigns. As of now, I think most of hunters are complaining about the tokens we received, distribution process and etc. If you want to be successful in cryptocurrency, move in other earning opportunities such as tradings or minings. If you want an assurance in campaign, I suggest to look after Hhampuz. S/he is a great campaign manager.

[Om.monata]

I would say rank does not matter in the success of any bounty. Even I don't trust newbies who do not have any experience in managing bounties because participating in such bounties can be a waste of time. Check every detail about the project whether they are providing it or not because sometimes they hide the details and say we will share later. Don't trust such peoples. My honest advice is to participate in those bounties that managed by experienced bounty managers.

Sometimes that's what we have to do, but believe me, bounties that are managed by experienced managers sometimes fail and have made it bad until now. so I think the rank is only a ranking, but performance may be the priority here to find out whether the project is successful or not

[TastyChillySauce00]

It actually depends on the company they are offering a bounty program. I remember in 2018, there a guy who as a newbie posted a bounty thread and it turned out to be a really good bounty, so you never know. But I agree with some that most newbies are scams and you can not trust them. So research before you sign up and work for them.

that being said if it's not all of newbies accounts that managed the campaign will always be ended as the scam project. Based on what you have been saying above and we can't determine the result of the campaign based on the early judgement without try to know deeper about the project itself.
People are taking it too easy to judge any campaign managed by newbie account.

[bakasabo]

It actually depends on the company they are offering a bounty program. I remember in 2018, there a guy who as a newbie posted a bounty thread and it turned out to be a really good bounty, so you never know. But I agree with some that most newbies are scams and you can not trust them. So research before you sign up and work for them.

True. That is "don't judge a book by its cover" That is why when choosing bounty to participate in, hunters should not only make a project research (check team, webpage, whitepaper for plagiarism), but also spend some time in bounty group and see how admin act. If the group is moderated poorly and admin dont bother deleting spam, or a lot of users complain about stakes or there is a weak feedback from admin - better dont waste time on them.

Personally, I would rather skip bounty under newbie management, because I doubt that the project is well experienced in managing bounties and interacting with hunters. If the campaign is managed by Full Members and above - I would check his post history, trying to evaluate how good he could be, or did he have experience in managing or participating in bounties. And will always join bounty campaign under the management of reputed manager.

[Question123]

Actually the bounty campaign is risky to join because maybe you will get your reward or not and your work will become useless your effort and for sure you will not like it happen to you like what happened to the bounty hunters.

Finding good bounty campaign is very hard now because it has a lot of scam or failed so once you decided to join you need to take a risk and be ready what ever the result and don't expect too much .

[doomloop]

Normally bounty is not "free money" because they promise bounty hunters a certain token for their contribution and not just for participation. When that token is given and worths nearly nothing at all, that is understandable like the pain of wasting your efforts.

Project owners usually do not want their tokens to worth nothing, I mean there could be some that created their projects as a scam to get funding and make money and I understand that, but even they would prefer if their token worth a lot, they would scam even more that way, so all in all everyone would want their tokens to worth a lot. But there are times when bounties are not even given away, that part I never really understand. When you open up a bounty and do not pay your bounty hunters, that means they have as much power to destroy as promoting you and no project should do that even if they are scams.

[Lanatsa]

There are so many bounty campaign that moderate by newbie with 2/3 activities, is that kind of bounty are safe and believable?

It depends because in most cases where noobs doesn't really have the idea on how this forum works unless those are just alts of somebody who do have experience of this place
then that might really be considerable and also if that newbie is part of the team and does have knowledge on how do things works then you can eventually tell if
he had done his job well.

If you do really matter with some assurance then it would be better to stick out with reputable managers of this forum.
but doesn't mean that every project handled is a success.

[martina14]

There are so many bounty campaign that moderate by newbie with 2/3 activities, is that kind of bounty are safe and believable?

This depend on you belief of the newbie Bounty manager just simple as that. Because there are some well known Bounty manager where in the end the project owner sometimes got failed to continue due to it can't able to continue. That's most of them always post a disclaimer to their bounty announcement about their connection to the project owner they manage.

[kramat]

Yes, you can believe it or not, depending on how you determine the project, if I personally don't see the project from the rank manager, I only give newbies the opportunity to become a professional manager so we can have a more reliable manager.

[soetikno]

usually they create bounty campaigns with the rules they like, the manager who uses the mewbie account I don't think is trusted, sometimes they are slow in updating the report spreadsheet

[Shasha80]

Don't underestimate the bounty campaign led by newbies, because some bounty campaigns that have bounty managers with
newbie rank are some that are good. Although I have to admit that a bounty campaign led by a high rank bounty manager is
safer and more reliable. So the point is what I want to say, don't choose the bounty campaign based solely on the bounty managers
who lead. But also check the roadmap, project team, website and social media.

[bakasabo]

Don't underestimate the bounty campaign led by newbies, because some bounty campaigns that have bounty managers with
newbie rank are some that are good. Although I have to admit that a bounty campaign led by a high rank bounty manager is
safer and more reliable. So the point is what I want to say, don't choose the bounty campaign based solely on the bounty managers
who lead. But also check the roadmap, project team, website and social media.

What exactly are these newbies? The one that has same username as project or "<projects name>_official" ? Or newbies with username like "kjdfdf6", "vantufri" or something random? I would suggest to look at their post count and post history. I just cant believe that a newbie could manage campaign well. Where from he could get experience?

I guess the right will be do research or investigation before joining, then try to calculate expected income (if possible), do not rush to join every campaign and skip them after a single suspicious action from team or manager.

[jrrsparkles]

There are so many bounty campaign that moderate by newbie with 2/3 activities, is that kind of bounty are safe and believable?

Newbie or Legendary, you shouldn't give attention to the rank if profile which is promoting the bounty. Just take a look at the project then decide whether it is actually worth to get those tokens or not. Nowadays mostly the bounties are managed by the project itself so its normal that you will see a newbie there but take a look at the profile and make sure it is actually connected with the project or not.