Transaction

[J3rk1e]

Thanks

[1714494096]

1714494096

[1714494096]

1714494096

[1714494096]

1714494096

[1714494096]

1714494096

[Rath_]

Code: -26, Error: insufficient fee, rejecting replacement 90dd85ac13ba0d4d36794f4a066af9795a2c09d4fe1efea35873de893d2f7797; new feerate 0.00001010 BTC/kB <= old feerate 0.00001181 BTC/kB

The fee of your replacement transaction is too low. You cannot replace the previously broadcast transaction without increasing the transaction fee.

[FinneysTrueVision]

You are trying to replace a transaction with a lower fee than the original trasaction. It needs to be higher.

[ranochigo]

You have to calculate the feerate in terms of sat/byte to be greater than the value paid in the initial transaction.

The replacement transaction also have to have a greater total fee than the initial transaction and paying at least 1sat/byte more than the previous transaction. It will not work if you only pay 0.5sat/byte more than the previous transaction as the increment must minimally be the node's mintxrelayfee.

[nc50lc]

Looks like the issue was solved, figured due to the address' blockexplorer history.

But, anyone love to see some details? Here's some:
It appears that he had replaced this 1.182sat/vB fee rate transaction: 27b60a104906256079236fafb7d62fb37208a26458ebd2258abcffc77a3d6453
with 5a624e5bcee5161217cf2d4dbe922c66b61d82d8fbc3820e2cfd4134f09d3afa that sent back the coins to his wallet, using the same address as the inputs.

Then somehow the same inputs were used the first time he tried to send to bc1qk0fdr6cq8lt7qdlyl045nvjqmalkkzvfqs72n0.
I suspect that the fee rate is just suggested by Bitcoin core's estimation.

Code:

    "inputs": [
        {
            "addresses": [
                "17mMVesSaC6kL4F8g5bA13u5iEvWc4ytND"
            ],
            "age": 601104,
            "output_index": 0,
            "output_value": 472021,
            "prev_hash": "f43cbaccdf447369a4d9dd231dc087ca02b0526e00d91f0561a9544f4c90cc99",
            "script": "473044022077154e42f100048dac1273bf624ed5d51abc696002fa440792eb59a9 -snip-",
            "script_type": "pay-to-pubkey-hash",
            "sequence": 4294967293
        },
        {
            "addresses": [
                "17mMVesSaC6kL4F8g5bA13u5iEvWc4ytND"
            ],
            "age": 590503,
            "output_index": 1,
            "output_value": 678529,
            "prev_hash": "b4e218497a2500b99f1f849c744143af46fe7fd61ed381d195fd4213a2e714c3",
            "script": "47304402206d34e2d861ddce65adb9e676db7375fddf734f2eaa76 -snip-",
            "script_type": "pay-to-pubkey-hash",
            "sequence": 4294967293
        },
        {
            "addresses": [
                "17mMVesSaC6kL4F8g5bA13u5iEvWc4ytND"
            ],
            "age": 585899,
            "output_index": 0,
            "output_value": 560621,
            "prev_hash": "40736fe05bd2389d0a2a726a8acd747cd2c7ce84a3d98d497f247dff42dfa69d",
            "script": "473044022018827c1ea7924ddc1405732d5163ac75c293ef9b1db881927f7a247916be6a -snip-",
            "script_type": "pay-to-pubkey-hash",
            "sequence": 4294967293
        },
        {
            "addresses": [
                "17mMVesSaC6kL4F8g5bA13u5iEvWc4ytND"
            ],
            "age": 628291,
            "output_index": 0,
            "output_value": 5894754,
            "prev_hash": "5148f6c2205a63c7ad768a50a32c12ef4828020fdbb6af7157947c1bcec23012",
            "script": "47304402204ecb7886d6f97e8524ddeb12a318bef5eb40228beb78ac867d5d0e9df8fab8d8022 -snip-",
            "script_type": "pay-to-pubkey-hash",
            "sequence": 4294967293
        },
        {
            "addresses": [
                "17mMVesSaC6kL4F8g5bA13u5iEvWc4ytND"
            ],
            "age": 601120,
            "output_index": 1,
            "output_value": 472544,
            "prev_hash": "f945edc32db2121b857483cd8c44a10056ca7c9cb6d34dfa1d0cc51507d8afdf",
            "script": "4730440220670f430fd7ac269731d3750e888b7b3736bc9ac66c613f7fb2bd79abf2cb2abe02201fb8dc3 -snip-",
            "script_type": "pay-to-pubkey-hash",
            "sequence": 4294967293
        },
        {
            "addresses": [
                "17mMVesSaC6kL4F8g5bA13u5iEvWc4ytND"
            ],
            "age": 601104,
            "output_index": 0,
            "output_value": 431559,
            "prev_hash": "cc1eb9247649a6663b3053781da61c671580f14748d070bbcbb084549d00ac91",
            "script": "47304402201f9c65a8052bba8930ec5ee22d26f1e34c98228b958fd17f5cd4d008ba037130022015f2 -snip-",
            "script_type": "pay-to-pubkey-hash",
            "sequence": 4294967293
        },
        {
            "addresses": [
                "17mMVesSaC6kL4F8g5bA13u5iEvWc4ytND"
            ],
            "age": 577958,
            "output_index": 0,
            "output_value": 2355860,
            "prev_hash": "2b81fb9e1647d8b3621b82512f8fc6f66c0ea85e2e2603e7f2a315c4f36a238e",
            "script": "47304402205a39f17302c16faf40acf82054655649fbd8e7d9432cf943e14486d6b19aadbb0220361a80 -snip-",
            "script_type": "pay-to-pubkey-hash",
            "sequence": 4294967293
        }
    ],
    "lock_time": 662285,
    "opt_in_rbf": true,
    "outputs": [
        {
            "addresses": [
                "bc1qk0fdr6cq8lt7qdlyl045nvjqmalkkzvfqs72n0"
            ],
            "script": "0014b3d2d1eb003fd7e037e4fbeb49b240df7f6b0989",
            "script_type": "pay-to-witness-pubkey-hash",
            "value": 10864580
        }

But the next attempt used the consolidated output of the previous transaction instead, that solved the issue as seen here: 17mMVesSaC6kL4F8g5bA13u5iEvWc4ytND