Non successful projects find it hard to pay

[bittick]

Hm, how about projects that successfully raise hardcap on exchanges and still deny bounty hunters their promised coins or tokens? Bounty hunting is wide and anything is bound to happen, even projects that failed to meet their softcap target still pays bounty hunters, this hunting thing is game, you can win or lose in unexpected ways

The hunters have no power to force the scammer who has been getting a lot of money but refuse to pay the hunters its reward. So many scam projects that successfully raised the funds were scamming the hunters. We have see that happened so many times.
That's why so many hunters in demand to use escrow to secure their payment.

[1714613432]

1714613432

[1714613432]

1714613432

[1714613432]

1714613432

[arifteguhr]

The reason why many projects do not pay for participants that I have observed for 2 years is active in participating in the campaign.
-The team fled with the sales fund
-There was a communication miss with the bounty manager
-There was a cancellation unilaterally when it was finished
Projects that have the potential to fail are better avoided to follow than later we regret that there will be a roblem when finished. Not a few at this time there are many indications that the existing project is a potential scam

[nykka]

I prefer to participate in bounty campaigns arranged by already popular and high-cap projects, because they have authority and opportunity to pay to the people, who were working. It`s much more safe to participate in events arranged by such projects, because you`re sure, your time isn`t wasted

[fahmimajannat]

Yeah successful projects are now hardly seen.
I don’t know what is the main reason behind it. If they pay low its quite acceptable. Most of them Don't even pay. Hunters works for months but in the end gets nothing.
Reason …
Bounty manager scammed
Team Isn't paying
Distribution will be in next month
But next month never comes.

[Cryptosaja]

Well, there are many ICO projects that  do not get  enough funds or soft caps, so the  team is very  difficult to pay the campaign participants.
That’s the reason because  so many  projects also commit scams so  that projects that are really serious and good, don’t get a steady stream
of funds from investors. But there are also projects that get funding and great success on their ICO, but they still don’t want to pay campaign
participants, that’s really sneaky.

[Yamifoud]

Are new projects supposed to be well successful today to pay bounty hunters their promised payment? If they raise huge amount of money paying bounty hunters won't be a big problem, am I right ?

If they really wanted to pay their participants, they will pay them as they have promise but it happens that most unsuccessful projects never show up after their ICO/IEO. Very unfortunate and that is the truth now. We got lucky if we receive those rewards but the problem is where you can trade them, they are not yet listed.

If you are participating in these projects, better not to expect them because that possible it gives you nothing. You can't force them either as they are not active anymore in their telegram.

[Eco_111]

Are new projects supposed to be well successful today to pay bounty hunters their promised payment? If they raise huge amount of money paying bounty hunters won't be a big problem, am I right ?

No, they don't have to be known throughout the whole world, they don't have to raise hardcap target, that's why bounty allocations are very small, mostly from 0.01% to 1% of the total max supply of the projects, I don't see any reason why a new project should deny hunters there payments unless they raised nothing in ICO or IEO

[Greatdev]

Are new projects supposed to be well successful today to pay bounty hunters their promised payment? If they raise huge amount of money paying bounty hunters won't be a big problem, am I right ?

Successful projects find it hard to pay and keep their promises, poolz raised huge amount of money and they refused to pay promoters because the token raised up to 14$ per token, isn't that greediness? Successful or not won't determine if you are going to get paid

[torrantz]

It never going to be easy for a project that's not successful to pay promoters, if they raise very low amount of money for development they can decide not to pay a dime, it's never their fault, as a reasonable bounty hunter if a project you promote failed to raise money for development do not bother to expect anything from such project, it's not easy to look away but it's part of the risks that bounty hunters must take

Being bounty hunter is the same as investing to a project but instead of money you're investing your time. I think if the reward pool have been decided from the very start and the allocation already made aswell there's no reason for the project to refuse to pay, for example when the developer already proposed of the token total supply allocation. except if the projects fail hard they can't picture to maintain that project even for a year or the bounty hunter were promised with stablecoins as a payment which doesn't exist if there's no money to be raised.

[Eddyc]

Accepting defeat is painful because it is a mixture of hurt ego with hopelessness of failure. When analyzing the failures of the projects we found a high level of egoism of the developers who are not concerned with the correct disclosure and who pay the minimum possible to the disseminators. Then that following sentence: Whatever you plant you reap, works in the corporate world and in business. How many projects have raised large amounts of funds and fail? Several and selfishness is the primary problem.

[firmino10]

There are not many projects that neglected to meet their tokensale target but still stay faithful to their obligation to bounty hunters, the last one was youengine, I'm astounded how dependable this team are in any event, when they failed to collect enough money for their project they actually paid each penny owed, numerous new projects will keep away from to pay once they failed to reach hardcap.

[doctor877]

Most times the projects don't usually have intentions to pay, they just want to use hunters and dump them. If you check records of project that paid as they said, you will notice that the team are truthful to their words. When team is transparent and truthful to their words they won't find it difficult to pay hunters. And if you check some of this projects that didn't pay, they are no where to be found.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

Are new projects supposed to be well successful today to pay bounty hunters their promised payment? If they raise huge amount of money paying bounty hunters won't be a big problem, am I right ?

I think this is not how this really works, but to some extent, you are right, some projects owners find it difficult to pay bounty hunters if their ICO or IEO or whatever didn't go well, the reason for this for some is because the project might not continue so whats the need spending their money to distribute useless tokens, but for some others, it's just wickedness.
And there are still some that get all the money to run the project successfully but still refuse to pay bounty hunter out of greed and deceit, this kind of projects I don't trust cus sooner or later, they will go down and investors will loose money.

[odukoyaewatomi27]

The facts demonstrate that the project team's commitment to pay the bounty hunters as guaranteed, but the truth of the matter is that over 80% of the current new projects make it difficult to pay bounty hunters. There are numerous reasons they use to continue to postpone payment and they ordinarily vanish over the long run. This is what is frequently experienced by bounty hunters today. I can comprehend if the projects fall flat, at that point the projects team is experiencing difficulty in paying bounty hunters.

[coin-investor]

Are new projects supposed to be well successful today to pay bounty hunters their promised payment? If they raise huge amount of money paying bounty hunters won't be a big problem, am I right ?

If you are joining a bounty campaign sometimes there is a stipulation that the project will not push through if the soft cap is not meet, and besides even if they distribute their token it will be useless because the project will be abandon because of lack of enough funding to make the project a realization, but if the project is a big success they should pay bounty hunters it's their obligation.

[illnino]

Now, at the height of cryptocurrency fame, many companies want to launch their projects and create coins. But at the beginning of their journey, they may not themselves know how their company will develop, whether people will be interested in what they offer. Therefore, you cannot call everyone scammers, perhaps this is just a failure in business.

[StephenJH]

You are definitely right on that there is not any project which is really a great choice for paying. New projects have always been dark for me, instead of choosing these projects l prefer to focus on other projects. Most of the new projects can be unsuccessful, there is a high risk of investing in these projects. If we want to make decisions about choosing projects, we should make hard research about the project, which we want to invest. The project which you above mentioned mostly they don't pay what pledged. For this reason, try staying away from them is the best choice.

[b1boy]

lol this is funny because not only unsuccessful project find it hard to pay because i have worked for some very successful projects and soon as they realize that the token is really doing well in the market then they start looking for different excuses to cheat hunters out of their earned rewards , so its not a matter of successful or not any project that actually has a good plan would pay no matter what

[Btc_1856]

Now, at the height of cryptocurrency fame, many companies want to launch their projects and create coins. But at the beginning of their journey, they may not themselves know how their company will develop, whether people will be interested in what they offer. Therefore, you cannot call everyone scammers, perhaps this is just a failure in business.

Actually, companies don't have any clue about the future developments, firstly they want to raise the funds and most of them scammed the investors in this way. They will design the roadmap in an attractive way and after fundraising, they won't bother the development activity.

[gurunanakji777]

Even I have seen many projects that were successful and did not pay the reward as promised on the other hand those project who are unsuccessful we do not expect anything from those projects. If a project achieves its target its dev duty is to pay reward as promised and that would not be the issue. I started participating in bounties again for the last 3 months and seeing that most of the bounties are doing good and paying as well.