[ANN] Piece (PieceOfPi) Scrypt Algorithm Have A Piece!!!

[piececollector]

Everybody needs to STOP mining with the exe wallet posted in this thread. And if you can go back to the original repository which doesn't have a wallet yet. In till. It comes from the source.

Here's an idea.

Why don't you compile a genuine windows wallet, and linux wallet.
Restart the blockchain and then all is well.

Fairly obvious that people are going to try (and mainly fail) to create there own exe if you dont provide  one.

I never get my devs release only partly completed projects....

good idea i'm working on something now I have to re-plan things a little and push it back. smh i might be able to turn this around the way it is. but starting over might be the way to go.

[1715034448]

1715034448

[1715034448]

1715034448

[1715034448]

1715034448

[1715034448]

1715034448

[1715034448]

1715034448

[1715034448]

1715034448

[ShllFT]

good idea i'm working on something now I have to re-plan things a little and push it back. smh i might be able to turn this around the way it is. but starting over might be the way to go.

Do you need help for compiling wallets? Also for the rest with the issues on transaction, just put values like there are in the pull requests except the maximum block size, keep it at 600 like you wanted, but change at least the maximum transaction size so people can send coins at each other. Also the source code needs a node (2 would be the best) so people stay on the same chain.

[Sparks60]

( but starting over might be the way to go.)
if that happens, will all miners lose all coins already mined?

[ShllFT]

( but starting over might be the way to go.)
if that happens, will all miners lose all coins already mined?

Yes because that would be a hard fork

[piececollector]

( but starting over might be the way to go.)
if that happens, will all miners lose all coins already mined?

If you mined with the exe wallet you might not have but the old wallet maybe because the that chain is longer. but on top of that the wallet has a virus that was uploaded so that has to be re compiled and scanned. I'll see what I can do with that. everybody need to STOP now ya'll have powerful hashing computers. If you dont STOP i'm going to keep starting over intill its correct. refrained from jumping ahead of the source im goin to have to block the ability to fork because of how fast and easy forks can happen. i think ya'll should focus on the big dogs right now intill I get this correct. the fork was not a good move at the early stage and I think it killed my baby smh but i might be able to fix it have to take contact Original Tasty because they basically took over the whole blockchain and mined a lot of coin with others. over 100,000 thousand already smh. this coin moves really fast only 8 years this is a hyper accelerated version of Litecoin and bitcoin. everybody need to slow way down in the beginning. baby steps.

[piececollector]

I'd suggest a 1:1 exchange.  Not many have mined.  I hope it wasn't a waste of time.

1:1 is possible thats possible
definitely not a waste of time just have to regroup i dont know what kind of computers ya'll working with be im curious.  we have to work together and follow a guide thats important in order for this to work. because the coin was forked and a lot of Pieces were mined very quickly.

[benjy33]

I'd suggest a 1:1 exchange.  Not many have mined.  I hope it wasn't a waste of time.

1:1 is possible thats possible
definitely not a waste of time just have to regroup i dont know what kind of computers ya'll working with be im curious.  we have to work together and follow a guide thats important in order for this to work. because the coin was forked and a lot of Pieces were mined very quickly.

small home quantum computer is online  , why don't you create a discord channel?

[ShllFT]

I noticed two chains yesterday.  Something odd happened around 3 pm.

What happened yesterday is because i've shut down the main node. People kept mining while being connected at each other and some been disconnected and the pool reconnected from here and there peers which created another fork and orphan blocks
Also the 4.2 seconds block time is not helping

I think that swaping the coins would not be a great idea, if the dev makes a final version, it would be simplier and more fair for new miners to just start it from scratch again.

It is my fault i should not had made changes in code, i was very sure the dev would accept those changes i've made at this point since no transactions were possible and had to change it so the mining process in pool was becoming possible. I wasn't expecting it making a hard fork too, maybe only a soft fork but not a hard one, sadly it is what it does 

[benjy33]

Send me an address privately and I will give a few coins, take it as a gift from kings, do not post here, close the thread

[olkah]

Send me an address privately and I will give a few coins, take it as a gift from kings, do not post here, close the thread

P9QMMU5Se32pxX6QyMmwsJzoyAGmSjiZjv

[ShllFT]

but on top of that the wallet has a virus that was uploaded so that has to be re compiled and scanned.

You meant the wallet i've put online? If so, there was no virus in it at all. The alerts from virustotal are the usual false positive alerts for Intern Miners from old compiled source wallets.
If we remove the nodes in the code, we have less alerts too, but that would be too bad removing them.


Regarding the hashpower, it was ASICS on scrypt algorithm, not computers  

this coin moves really fast only 8 years

I think you are wrong, if there is a block every 4.2 seconds, then it would be a 657.6199 days of mining (approximatively) so that would be about 1.8 years

[benjy33]

Send me an address privately and I will give a few coins, take it as a gift from kings, do not post here, close the thread

P9QMMU5Se32pxX6QyMmwsJzoyAGmSjiZjv

DELETE!!! post I already have you in my wallet

[benjy33]

The developer said mining was fine from the start.  Some of us worked hard to mine it and that was fair.  It's not my fault the chain went funny.

So I see no reason why a 1 to 1 exchange is not fair.  Or just update the chain.

the developer is an amateur following a youtube tutorial, do not expect much, nor did he realize that the transactions in the 1 wallet did not work a disaster in every way, do not waste any more time ,
there is no discord channel, there is no explorer he did not make the windows wallet so it contained viruses, some clever trying to steal some coins or btc

[ShllFT]

The developer said mining was fine from the start.  Some of us worked hard to mine it and that was fair.  It's not my fault the chain went funny.

So I see no reason why a 1 to 1 exchange is not fair.  Or just update the chain.

True but how to verify who mined how many coins respectively and etc..? Since  there were also maybe 2 or 3 forks mining in the way, somebody could claim for XX coins and could also be a lie. Anybody at this point can make a fork in few minutes, have more than 90,000 coins with a decent screenshot and even a video to prove it and claim a 1:1 swap.

That's why maybe a new start would be the best without swap unfortunately it would be more "fair" in that way  

[olkah]

no exchange no pool is what do you think is the point of hard and other if there are no 2 main components

[piececollector]

The developer said mining was fine from the start.  Some of us worked hard to mine it and that was fair.  It's not my fault the chain went funny.

So I see no reason why a 1 to 1 exchange is not fair.  Or just update the chain.

I could except the pull request if submitted again withe the block size increase but keep transaction size at 60 Bytes I want to see if that would work. I'm in middle of testing some stuff out. Since original tasty has the hash power he could mine a bunch of coins and send them to you but the wallet has to be redone. It's a whole process cuz I lost control too early but I rather it happen early so you and others don't waste anymore time because I don't have the hash power to protect the network. It's up to them so it's a test to see if the network can regulate itself because it will be needed. People have to try not to use too much hadhi g power and let people get coins or start sending coins to addresses to other miners to add to whatever they have.  If not then I'm going to have to start a new chain and block people from forking in till things settle the network needs to grow grassroots I can only mine about 200 or more without the big hashing power but only maybe 25 with it. It's crazy. That's why I'm curious to what y'all using some transparency would help. Like I said if not then I have to block  people from forking.but that probably won't stop others from finding away around. The project might be ruined because the fork I don't understand why someone would fork like that.that was selfish to just takeover we need unselfish miners with big hashing power to help secure the network from others. I know what this coin could do if the network can come together. It's about allocation. Anybody trying to mine without donating or spreading the coins to other less powerful miners shouldn't be here. That's what makes the network secure no one person should have the majority you have to regulate yourselves.  Everybody doesn't have the same tools BE FAIR  this sh!t won't work. It's like a computer hashing war. If you have a basic laptop pull it out dust it off and use it. And if you see something funny going on in the network you pull out ya big guns and get to hashing to gain control. New people will come in and do the same so it's a hashing war.

[benjy33]

no exchange no pool is what do you think is the point of hard and other if there are no 2 main components

there is nothing lool, non-functional source code, no explorer, no pool, no discord, no interest from the amateur developer haha

[piececollector]

The developer said mining was fine from the start.  Some of us worked hard to mine it and that was fair.  It's not my fault the chain went funny.

So I see no reason why a 1 to 1 exchange is not fair.  Or just update the chain.

the developer is an amateur following a youtube tutorial, do not expect much, nor did he realize that the transactions in the 1 wallet did not work a disaster in every way, do not waste any more time ,
there is no discord channel, there is no explorer he did not make the windows wallet so it contained viruses, some clever trying to steal some coins or btc

You can say amateur but you can't deny this is a good idea I don't care about discord but the block explorer for sure. People are just moving too fast like I said before. I'm still learning but I ain't gone let none of y'all shit on my shit. Foh where's your coin at? This is the first of it's kind.

[piececollector]

no exchange no pool is what do you think is the point of hard and other if there are no 2 main components

there is nothing lool, non-functional source code, no explorer, no pool, no discord, no interest from the amateur developer haha

Yeah cuz somebody came in and just started doing g sh!t on there own. Probably didn't even read the white paper.

[olkah]

The developer said mining was fine from the start.  Some of us worked hard to mine it and that was fair.  It's not my fault the chain went funny.

So I see no reason why a 1 to 1 exchange is not fair.  Or just update the chain.

the developer is an amateur following a youtube tutorial, do not expect much, nor did he realize that the transactions in the 1 wallet did not work a disaster in every way, do not waste any more time ,
there is no discord channel, there is no explorer he did not make the windows wallet so it contained viruses, some clever trying to steal some coins or btc

You can say amateur but you can't deny this is a good idea I don't care about discord but the block explorer for sure. People are just moving too fast like I said before. I'm still learning but I ain't gone let none of y'all shit on my shit. Foh where's your coin at? This is the first of it's kind.

where is the functioning pool ?