Bitcoin Forum
January 22, 2018, 12:44:49 PM
 Home Help Search Donate Login Register
 Pages: [1]
 Author Topic: There is 20 times as much mBTC as there is currency in EU circulation  (Read 2134 times)
sverre
Newbie

Offline

Activity: 18

 April 02, 2011, 01:16:52 AM

Just some interesting math: the possible range of BTC values is between 0.00000001 to 21,000,000 (https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/PHP_developer_intro#Precision).

In theory if BTC becomes popular enough (and thus increasingly valuable, thanks to a fixed maximum) it will be traded in uBTC (0.000001), so people would treat uBTC as "dollars", and that still leaves two decimal places for cents, i.e. you'd be buying things for 123.45 uBTC. In uBTC, with the maximum value of 21,000,000BTC, there's an in-built currency limit of

21,000,000,000,000.00 uBTC.

By comparison, there is currently 1035.2 billion USD in circulation in the EU (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circulation_(currency) ), which is:

1,035,200,000,000.00 USD

So if necessary there is 20 times more uBTC than there is money currently in circulation in the EU.

EDIT - changed mBTC to uBTC
1516625089
Hero Member

Offline

Posts: 1516625089

Ignore
 1516625089

1516625089
 Report to moderator
1516625089
Hero Member

Offline

Posts: 1516625089

Ignore
 1516625089

1516625089
 Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
Nefario
Hero Member

Offline

Activity: 602

GLBSE Support support@glbse.com

 April 02, 2011, 01:22:53 AM

I think the only issue for a deflationary currency with regards this topic is how divisible it is, currently as far as I understand we're using 64bit integers, if that level of divisibility is not enough in the future we could always move to 128bit integers

PGP key id at pgp.mit.edu 0xA68F4B7C

To get help and support for GLBSE please email support@glbse.com
sverre
Newbie

Offline

Activity: 18

 April 02, 2011, 01:48:41 AM

Even with 64-bit integers you have 20 decimal digits to play with, and the current implementation only uses 16 (8 digits before the decimal, 8 digits after), so the .01 uBTC precision limit must be a design decision not a datatype limitation.
Nefario
Hero Member

Offline

Activity: 602

GLBSE Support support@glbse.com

 April 02, 2011, 01:53:02 AM

Even with 64-bit integers you have 20 decimal digits to play with, and the current implementation only uses 16 (8 digits before the decimal, 8 digits after), so the .01 uBTC precision limit must be a design decision not a datatype limitation.

Well then, I guess we will have to wait until everyone on the entire planet is using bitcoins before we really have to worry much about anything like this.

PGP key id at pgp.mit.edu 0xA68F4B7C

To get help and support for GLBSE please email support@glbse.com
Sr. Member

Offline

Activity: 420

 April 04, 2011, 04:08:01 AM

Even with 64-bit integers you have 20 decimal digits to play with, and the current implementation only uses 16 (8 digits before the decimal, 8 digits after), so the .01 uBTC precision limit must be a design decision not a datatype limitation.

Well then, I guess we will have to wait until everyone on the entire planet is using bitcoins before we really have to worry much about anything like this.

If it gets to that point I'd be sad and surprised if everyone on this board doesn't have more \$\$\$ than they know what to do with.
It would be nice though. Look back at the .05btc you got from the faucet and think about it as \$10,000USD

moneyandtech.com
@moneyandtech @jeredkenna
PLATO
Sr. Member

Offline

Activity: 275

Subversive

 April 04, 2011, 11:33:59 PM

Also don't forget that when multiple banks each have fifty trillion dollars of derivatives on their balance sheets, it's basically monopoly money
 Pages: [1]