Should BESTCHANGE pay proven willing scam facilitators like nutildah to post?

[Laudanum]

READ THE EVIDENCE BEFORE TRYING TO EXCUSE THIS SCUMBAG.

I CHALLENGE NUTILDAH TO COME AND DEFEND HIMSELF NOT JUST COME HERE LIKE A COWARD POSTING PICS AND LIES ATTEMPTING TO CLAIM THIS IS TROLLING.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5190369.0

This post clearly details how the bitcointalk member nutildah the willing scam facilitator for pay is here being paid to post by
BESTCHANGE? Why?

Are BESTCHANGE aware they are paying a proven willing scam facilitator for pay who tried to delete his post history and hide that fact to post here on bitcointalk?

I will be asking them on their own thread shortly.

Those that have scammed, protected scammers or that have demonstrated they are willing to facilitate scams for a price and then try to delete their post history should be banned. If they are not banned they should certainly not be getting paid to post here by sponsors like BESTCHANGE.

Read the link posted at the top before you start lying and saying the bitcointalk member nutildah is not willing to facilitate scammers for a price.

Also read the part where he says he was never interested in having a banner or milking the forum for money.


Who is the campaign manager and do they know?
Have they reviewed the link and the evidence contained within ?

All discussion is invited. Should those that have demonstrated direct financially dangerous behaviors be forgiven and be paid to post here after a certain time frame? Or should honest members always be given priority?

BESTCHANGE  should let me know their thoughts.

You don't agree nutildah was willing to facilitate scammers for pay? Debunk the evidence in the link posted above.

Nutildah can post but only to address the on topic and relevant points. No derailing.

[Hhampuz]

Get a life.

[Laudanum]

Get a life.

Who are you?
Did you review the evidence ?

I clearly said read the evidence before making foolish comments.

Let me guess you didnt review the evidence did you?

I bet their campaign manager will be getting asked by BESTCHANGE why they are being associated with proven willing scam facilitators for pay. I bet they are unaware?

Nobody should be sponsoring proven willing scam facilitators for pay who try to hide the evidence by deleting their post history.
That is like condoning it.

Imagine a thread that says they condone and want to pay those willing to facilitating scamming other members here for a fee and then try to delete their post history when busted?

That would look terrible.

What's wrong with hiring honest members ?

I bet that campaign manager needs to look into that else he could be correctly seen as condoning willing scam facilitating for pay which would taint every project he works with ?

Or do you disagree?

Read the evidence fully before responding. Thanks.

[Laudanum]

You have some mins to remove that weird off topic picture. Else I will do it.
That will not ever be permitted to remain on this thread. Also do NOT repost it.
You shall obey fatty.

Why not try to mount a credible defense for Nutildah or BESTCHANGE?
OR

too afraid and know there is no excuse that will stand up to scrutiny?

Come on you love me tearing your flimsy excuses apart in public. Treat yourself.

[owlcatz]

Since you're a little pussy and will delete this anyhow here ya go, scammer...



Oh yeah... btw ....



https://archive.is/dTIbQ

[Laudanum]

Since you're a little pussy and will delete this anyhow here ya go, scammer...



Oh yeah... btw ....

This is purrrfect

Look who turns up the scammer protector and extortionist  owlcatz

Review his past here:) read and research.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5286509.0

Look at the type of scum that we have here on DT excusing and colluding with others of a similar disposition.

Yuck.

Anyway they will scurry away now when you shine the light on them.
Owlcatz is probably looking to threaten some members parents to extort some money or something like that. Aka fowlScatz.

Anyway let's keep voting on BESTCHANGE paying proven willing scam facilitators for pay like nutildah.
Interesting votes so far.

You are obviously fucked in the head for producing irrefutable evidence of DT willing scammer facilitator for pay getting paid by BESTCHANGE? and asking why they are sponsoring scum like nutildah and not honest members?

Says fowlscatz.


...coldkey.EU.

Hmmm who are they paying to post here? Or who are they involved with?
Fowlscatz? That doesnt seem very sensible.

Not sure I would trust a company that works with extortionists.
I'll think about that more later perhaps.


Where is the attempt at defending nutildah? Where are the excuses?

[owlcatz]

Owlcatz is probably looking to threaten some members parents to extort some money or something like that. Aka fowlSkatz.

Guess what, you are super fuckin' stupid. I've never scammed or extorted anybody ya fuckin idiot. Go suck horse cocks.

[Laudanum]

Owlcatz is probably looking to threaten some members parents to extort some money or something like that. Aka fowlSkatz.

Guess what, you are super fuckin' stupid. I've never scammed or extorted anybody ya fuckin idiot. Go suck horse cocks.

That's not what the person said who you tried to extort.
Stop telling lies.


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1764757.msg32414335#msg32414335

Where did your partners in grime go? Weird how both vanished.
Anyway keep chatting I enjoy it.

Don't tell me nutildah isn't a willing scam facilitator for pay who tried to delete the evidence either ?
Tell me some more fowlscatz. You are helping nutildah out no end.

[Vod]

Where did your partners in grime go? Weird how both vanished.

Ricky or Julian?  I'm confused here...

[Laudanum]

Where did your partners in grime go? Weird how both vanished.

Ricky or Julian?  I'm confused here...

What are you confused about?

[Little Mouse]

Are BESTCHANGE aware they are paying a proven willing scam facilitator for pay who tried to delete his post history and hide that fact to post here on bitcointalk?

Did you contact them already before creating this thread? Or why even this thread? You can simply PM them and share what's on your mind and ask them politely whether they know about this or no. Why create this thread?
You are looking for community answer or Bestchange? If bestchange, try the above and if community, I think you should know the answer already. It’s bestchange money, it’s bestchange project, it’s bestchange advertising campaign. They better know whom they should hire for better reach to the community.

[Laudanum]

Are BESTCHANGE aware they are paying a proven willing scam facilitator for pay who tried to delete his post history and hide that fact to post here on bitcointalk?

Did you contact them already before creating this thread? Or why even this thread? You can simply PM them and share what's on your mind and ask them politely whether they know about this or no. Why create this thread?
You are looking for community answer or Bestchange? If bestchange, try the above and if community, I think you should know the answer already. It’s bestchange money, it’s bestchange project, it’s bestchange advertising campaign. They better know whom they should hire for better reach to the community.

These are all great points.
So are you saying that if BESTCHANGE decides they can reach the community widely via paying a confirmed willing scam facilitator for pay who tries to delete their history to hide the fact then that would be fine because its their money?

BESTCHANGE maybe unaware. It would really be the responsibility of their campaign manager.
I wonder if they are aware and if so? Perhaps they need to be fired.

[Mike Pompeo]

Get a life.

Yes, nutildah is held in high esteem on bitcointalk.org. I have seen him scam hunting & connecting alts & bounty cheaters over the years. This thread has been created for no reason other than to flame nutildah. OP cut the crap out & find something better to do.

[Laudanum]

Get a life.

Yes, nutildah is held in high esteem on bitcointalk.org. I have seen him scam hunting & connecting alts & bounty cheaters over the years. This thread has been created for no reason other than to flame nutildah. OP cut the crap out & find something better to do.

Thanks for the bump.
Sadly, the independently verifiable evidence undeniably debunks your empty claims.

Feel free to thrash out the details here. I'll be more than happy to help.
Here is the link again because may be you missed it.

Please specifically detail the points you want to debunk as untrue.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5190369.0

I see that also people may be wondering about the poll results. I will reveal them periodically here for those that haven't or couldn't vote but are still inquisitive.

[holydarkness]

Whoops, I almost missed a fun party here.

Yo, OP, let's see if I get this straight: you think bestchange made a mistake by employing Nutildah because he is a, quote unquote, scam facilitator, with your sole evidence and/or base argument is that he tried to sell his account... back in 2016?

Umm... two things: one, you asked people to read evidences before commenting here, but have you read the post right below that very "evidence"? And two, have you tried to, perhaps at your free time, look at his trust page? You know it's clickable and give you an access of his trust history, right? (mind blown much?) And I'm not talking about the one he received, I'm talking about the one he send. You know, the one where he tag scammers and effectively hunt and decimate them instead of facilitate them? Pretty much sure if he's a, quote unquote, scam facilitator, he should do the exact opposite.

Next evidence to be studied, please.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Guess what, you are super fuckin' stupid. I've never scammed or extorted anybody ya fuckin idiot. Go suck horse cocks.

What's interesting is that he linked to a thread by TOAA, which was an obvious alt account of cryptohunter--and I suspect OP is yet another, as he keeps trying to stir up old shit that nobody cares about except for him. 

I don't know a damn thing about Bestchange, by the way.  Is there a link somewhere in this thread pointing to the background on them or if I search in the Scam Accusation section, am I going to get a bunch of hits?  For the life of me I don't remember the name of that exchange (which is what I'm assuming it is). 

Nutildah is an upstanding member of the forum.  Even if he's promoting Bestchange (unless he knows it to be a scam).

[Little Mouse]

Nutildah is an upstanding member of the forum.  Even if he's promoting Bestchange (unless he knows it to be a scam).

There’s nothing wrong with Bestchange, they are doing pretty well other than some issue which have already been resolved. OP here trying to defame nutildah, not Bestchange. His point is why bestchange paying nutildah who is a scam facilitators (according to OP).

[Laudanum]

Whoops, I almost missed a fun party here.

Yo, OP, let's see if I get this straight: you think bestchange made a mistake by employing Nutildah because he is a, quote unquote, scam facilitator, with your sole evidence and/or base argument is that he tried to sell his account... back in 2016?

Umm... two things: one, you asked people to read evidences before commenting here, but have you read the post right below that very "evidence"? And two, have you tried to, perhaps at your free time, look at his trust page? You know it's clickable and give you an access of his trust history, right? (mind blown much?) And I'm not talking about the one he received, I'm talking about the one he send. You know, the one where he tag scammers and effectively hunt and decimate them instead of facilitate them? Pretty much sure if he's a, quote unquote, scam facilitator, he should do the exact opposite.

Next evidence to be studied, please.

This is a great example of what a dumb fuck would conflate as reason and logic.

1. Doesn't attempt to read the referenced thread. Where it is clear it is regarding way more than selling your account.

2. Greater dumb fuckery.. you don't get scammers or scam facilitators for pay that would also be capable of highlighting other scams and scammers.


Welcome dumb fuck.


Of course the pharmacist is here grovelling around to boost his post count.
This moronic broke bum has been here for years and still has to sig spam for dust.

Doesn't tackle the provided evidence that nutildah is willing to facilitating scamming for 300bucks and then delete his post history when its pointed out.  Just starts his usual moronic slobbering that " none of the scumbag DT scammer supporters on DT care if other dt members scam or are willing to facilitate scamming for a fee.

Thanks dumb fucks for the bumps.

Now debunk the evidence in the link.


Nutildah the willing scam facilitator for pay who will delete his own post history to mask the facts and trust abuse anyone that mentions the truth about him.

He will only be allowed to post here if he is willing to engage in debate on his independently verifiable past actions here.

No plastering the thread with lies that this is a troll

Nutildah is a troll for claiming that although it has been conclusively debunked many times.

Come here and debate you broke down scam facilitating bum.

The fact that the DT team

1. Has not tagged him
2. Included him on DT
3. Accepts an early dash adopter and nem stake holder ( 300btc) who claimed he was never here to spam sigs
Is now broke, begging for 0.02btc loans and spamming sigs

Lol

Look at this pussy nutildah.

I CHALLENGE NUTILDAH TO DEFEND HIS PRIOR WILLING SCAM FACILITATING AND DELETING HIS OWN POST HISTORY TO HIDE THE FACT.

Why are you a broke bum nutildah? What happened to being a early dash adopter and being handed  MILLIONS  of dollars by NEM?  LOL

[Quickseller]

I am no fan of nutildah. I think he is a troll and will says things without basis in fact that other forum members are not willing to say publicly.

I also don't think it is appropriate to try to censor him based on his views. That is exactly what you are doing. You are trying to cut off his income because he does not share your views, and because you do not like him. That is wrong and is not something you should do. If you disagree with nutildah, you should debate him if he is willing to do so.

When nutildah tries to troll me, I will generally ignore him. I would suggest you do the same.

[suchmoon]

I am no fan of nutildah. I think he is a troll and will says things without basis in fact that other forum members are not willing to say publicly.

Yeah but does he have a pill addiction? Has he embezzled signature campaign funds? Is he married to a doctor? I can't believe you haven't made up anything more serious than "a troll" for someone who committed a grave crime of exposing your sockpuppet.