jeremypwr and Bitcasino signature campaign

[Nilamily]

Today, there was some discussion in chimpixer campaign about their payment and I was reading comments.

Their fees have always been voluntary/donation-based. With more economic activity as price rises (as evidenced by higher BTC transaction fees) it stands to reason there'd also be more users using ChipMixer. But it might not all be 1:1, and seeing that DarkStar_ has merited suchmoon, the participants of this campaign should be prepared for reductions in rates paid. The 2nd highest paying campaign pays barely more than half what ChipMixer pays per post but with a smaller weekly post limit, and the 3rd highest is some shitcoin campaign with $6/post but with an even lower weekly post limit, and none of them are accepting new members.

I was curious knowing what is the 2nd highest paying campaign.
After searching I understood that is bitcasino.

I had never noticed their payment.

Bitcasino campaign thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4737831

The first thing came to my mind was why the thread is locked while that's active.
And now I think the answer is that the manager don't want the campaign to be noticed by people.

This campaign is paying 0.018 BTC for 25 posts weekly.

Their spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1RWUX_cvehsv1YWm1JqvZUJKwyYa8o2MROUJhXV2O9lE/edit#gid=171440006

Please go to "b" tab.

There are 5 users and below are three of them.

Users that are giving 0.018 BTC per week for 25 posts:

1. jeremypwr: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=137185

(The manager has hired himself?)

2. mich: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=9645

Please look at his trust score and his post history.
Aren't you surprised that he is giving 0.018 BTC weekly?

3. LFC_Bitcoin: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=379487

This user makes most of the post in wall observer where signature  are not shown.
If you don't count those posts, he don't even fulfill the 25 posts requirement for most of the weeks.

A question to jeremypwr:
Can't you really find better users for a campaign with that high earning?


A question to Bitcasino team:
Do you know what you are paying for? 

[The Sceptical Chymist]

There seems to be a strong vibe of jealousy around signature campaigns that pay a decent rate these days.  And OP, I'd never even heard of Bitcasino or its campaign, but if you think there's some shenanigans going on in it, you might want to contact the project owners.

Now, for these two:

1. jeremypwr: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=137185

(The manager has hired himself?)

2. mich: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=9645

Please look at his trust score and his post history.
Aren't you surprised that he is giving 0.018 BTC weekly?

Campaign managers have been known to make the maximum rate for the campaign as part of their hiring--I've seen one other case of that, and it was actually a campaign manager who was registered as Legendary member when he was lower than that.  If I recall correctly it did turn out to be legit.

As far as the negative feedback, it's from DT members but it wasn't left because mich scammed anyone.  And a disclaimer: I haven't read the Bitcasino campaign rules, so I don't know what their policy is on members with negative trust.  But all of that aside, I'm not sure why you're so upset about these things.

[Nilamily]

You never heard bitcasino because manager locked the topic for 2 year.
Why?
I think because don't want people notice what is happening.

I havent heard bitcasino too. I understood it today.

[suchmoon]

A question to jeremypwr:
Can't you really find better users for a campaign with that high earning?

A question to Bitcasino team:
Do you know what you are paying for?

I'm not a big fan of jeremypwr (or Bitcasino for that matter) but if you want to ask them a question you can send a PM... if you want to stir shit up you can create a sockpuppet account and make a thread with big bold letters. I wonder which is it that you're trying to do here.

[Nilamily]

Sorry.
I will lock thread.