1 BTC = 1 BTC - Off topic from Chipmixer campaign topic

[posi]

Every individual makes a good point but our thought and belief about 1BTC = 1BTC which is different are what causing the misconception. However, to get to the bottom of this issue we have to start with what causes this argument or else everything we said will be mistreatment.
The ChipMixer campaign participants that said 1BTC = 1BTC said that because the least chip the company offer is constantly 0.001BTC no matter the price of BTC in the market, it demonstrates the company itself accepted the idea of 1BTC = 1BTC

This make sense now. I was wondering why Op made the topic, I didn't really suspect it was about campaign payment. Thought maybe there are debate about whether the idea that 1btc = 1btc is true. Really depends on the context of the question. 1btc definitely was clearly different in price in the past compared to present because of Bitcoin price fluctuation. So, 1btc earned by people many years ago when Bitcoin was low in price is definitely unequal to 1btc earned today. But all available 1 BTCs are almost thesame in price in the present (despite what they were worth in the past) unless maybe they are virgin coins, tainted etc. So the answer to the question depends on the context.

If the answer was to depend on the context of the argument then 1BTC = 1BTC regardless of the previous and current price of the market or the coin unit since the conpany in the subject operations are also based in crypto not fiat currency.

 
If the company decides not to adjust campaign payments, it's their right, as long as that doesn't make their service relatively expensive. Maybe it's done for a good reason? Their Campaigners are very valuable to them and they can afford to keep paying them thesame?

The company was the long existing tumbler in terms of campaign and services even when some tumbler site have problems with the authorities and security vulnerabilities they kept their services intact certainly they can afford it but the decision is theirs not ours.

[1714704292]

1714704292

[1714704292]

1714704292

[1714704292]

1714704292

[1714704292]

1714704292

[NotATether]

People arguing to keep the ChipMixer payments at their current rates who are trying to get a bigger paycheck, they know that the campaign should decrease the rates and probably want the discussion about it to stop. It's logical, though a bit too smarmy.

i just think all the open speculation lacks tact. it feels icky. people with common sense understand the underlying economics and can reasonably expect what's gonna happen, but i just don't see the point in making some public spectacle out of CM's business decisions. that's why the discussion should cease and why the service thread should be cleaned up IMO.

Totally agree with this. I haven't even bothered to participate in this BTC-pegged-to-USD debate. At least that's how I view it as.

Generally when you are the elephant in the room you tend to get the most attention from humans, who don't even look dwarf-sized in comparison to elephants. That's kind of how I view signature campaigns and Chipmixer.

It's logical, though a bit too smarmy.

Jokes aside, 1BTC = 1BTC is already a mathematically proven axiom about self-equality. There's not much more to debate about that except for people's theorems based on this axiom (or its contradiction). There is a certain writing style you need to learn just to write down proofs of math theories. The beauty of it is that it does not allow opinions about theories to be included, so just the facts are left for you to process.

[bitmover]

I will close this topic, as it became a discussion whether cm should or not increase/decrease pay rates and what do people think about it. This wasn't the idea when I created this topic, but most replies were about it.