Adkinsbet Shills & Sock-Puppets: "Slender/Slander" and "Donk"

[JollyGood]

Since there has been too much going on in scam accusation threads against Adkinsbet I decided to start this thread. I added some users that should be ~tagged. I added several to my ignore list and recommend you consider doing the same.

Other names will be added to this list as and if I go through the relevant threads to read up on the sock-puppets and shills but for now here is a list of users that are either attention-seekers unconnected to Adkinsbet or are paid shills or sock-puppets - but all of them are highly obnoxious for one reason or another.

Ray (the representative of Adkinsbet) has not covered himself or his website in glory especially by linking the returning of stolen funds to a victim with it being on condition DT users withdraw support for a valid and appropriate flag against them.

Write one word against the way Ray or Adkinsbet have conducted themselves then the deluge starts, the onslaught of shills and sock-puppets start attacking those that take an interest in the scam accusations.

-----

So when it comes to writing SLENDER instead of SLANDER, it seems Adkinsbet Ray is in one way or another using the following accounts:


gadado https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=228733

Always nice to see when people on the forum are posting in the topic, and then somebody tells you that you would sell your own mother for 2 Eur.
Why would it not surprise me that Adkinsbet closed your account because of your talk?
And remember that you decided to slender them before your account was closed.
By the way based on your posting history you seem to have problems with more bookmakers. What a coincidence.

ronaldo40 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=373301

at this moment mister jollygood is giving negative tags without any reasons and has a big negative obsession for adkinsbet as well
i dont ask people to judge about adkinsbet.com but i want to ask if they can judge about what jollywood is doing is with the principles of begin DT1 member?
bumping accusation topics every time, trying to slender adkinsbet in ann topic and giving neg tags for nothing. that could not be the idea of DT1. he is using his DT1 status now to seek revenge for his frustrations

AdkinsBET https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2882335

We were already working on your case to solve it, but you decided to slender Adkinsbet indirectly on the forum. We told you that this is something that can not be accepted.
This is also clearly written in our terms:

In the following conditions, your account may be closed by us, and will be viewed and evaluated individually by case. We reserve the right to suspend your account without notice, which will remain suspended until complete investigation of the matter. Adkinsbet remains the right to confiscate the funds if one of the terms will be violated. You commit to completely comply with all of Adkinsbet 's inquiries into such activities. We may opt to upload or close your account and confiscate the funds if one of the following conditions apply:
If you have more than 1 registered account with Adkinsbet.
If the name registered on your Adkinsbet account does not match the name on the required statement from your address and or ID card. Of course, we take into consideration that all countries have different ways of express names.
If a player causes image damage to the website (Any direct / indirect accusation through any possible communication channel (e.g. forum, Email, telephone or other communication channels). This could include spreading false information, false accusations and intentionally / repeatedly putting Adkinsbet in a negative daylight.

So when it comes to writing DONK, it seems Adkinsbet Ray has a supporter who uses at least two accounts:

nasipadang https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=920708

Somebody must remove that donk jollygood out of DT.

jollyg00d https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3103643

I also asked Ray from Adkinsbet for some clarification about things in my post made just after yours but he has not yet responded. Their sock-puppets are posting in this thread but the AdkinsBET user account has not yet responded to the questions you and I asked.

How can many IP addresses have any meaning? I get a new IP address from my Internet provider at least once in 24 hours (DSL connection is reset if it lasts longer than 24 hours in a row). I believe this is the situation with many internet providers in the world.

Does that mean I can't use AdkinsBet? (It's NOT that I want to after all this, of course.)

So, they want to use this platform just for their own promotion and attract new players and do not want to address valid questions from the members of this community? I don't think there's been any service with that kind of mindset on this platform for a long time. They deserve nothing more than to get their reputation wasted if they can't take a few minutes a day to engage actively with the community.

Just shut your mouth if you keep posting posts like an idiot.
you are not objective, you are using alt accounts. You are not objective.
Can somebody grab that donk?

Nobody asked you anything you donk. You hacked my account.
If somebody has personal details about this donk, please PM me I offer 10k for this information.

The jollyg00d newbie account that was created specifically to troll even went as far as offering money for information. I wonder if Adkinsbet are happy with the innuendo and threats being made in their Adkinsbet promotion thread.
-------

In summary, most businesses that use sock-puppets or paid shills in the forum normally do it with the intention of trying to make money by getting users to visit their websites. In too many cases they make a mistake by flooding. For example look at coinsbit and cryptoknowmics, all of a sudden their sock-puppet accounts stopped posting after being found out and in the case of the former it was all out attack by them on users who challenged their sock-puppets at one point.

This attempt at spreading propaganda and trying to drum up business from this forum to their website has backfired spectacularly on Adkinsbet because they should have all stuck to spreading their narrative and pumping their with words of wisdom such as "oh, I never knew the chess game was on tomorrow so I will watch it and place a bet" but instead they all decided to attack those claiming to be victims of scams and those on DT.

Hopefully for Adkinsbet once the situation with the current scam allegations is either resolved or is simply forgotten, they might still have time to salvage the situation and get a good reputation but one of the first things they have to do is to stop using sock-puppets to pump their thread and stop using them to attack scam accusers and DT users.


~AdkinsBET
~aomakun
~BitcoinAccepted
~BlackFor3st
~BTCGOLD
~Cacingkemi
~codegnome
~coin.princess
~cutesgirl
~deadthings
~dj_koso
~gadado
~imutlinda
~jollyg00d
~mikelsmith2020
~MI6
~nasipadang
~ongkok87
~pranjicka
~ronaldo40
~sempak
~ufaiz50
~wildan88
~yayayo




Just take a look at the Last Active in all the images....

Whether any accounts may or may not be directly controlled by Adkinsbet meaning attention seeker are jumping on the bandwagon to create mischief, they only did because of the atmosphere created by Adkinsbet and both of them are responsible. I hope Adkinsbet take a look at the situation and stop using sock-puppets is a great first step. After that they should publicly distance themselves from those that jump to their defence that are obviously trolls and attention seekers. After that they should find a resolution to the scam accusations raised by these users:

oz.kashi https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5308700.0

polasaz https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5302600.0

Adzivu https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5310071.0

realscout https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5309454.0


If what Adkinsbet is saying is true that all these user accounts are operated by the same individual/gang that has set out to scam Adkinsbet then we need to start seeing a little bit more effort on their part to convince users and maybe some evidence but that is up to them, the onus is on them to stop using sock-puppets to create misdirection and for the Adkinsbet official account to start posting in a professional manner. Using sock-puppets just defeats the object.

self-moderated in order to keep it clean from attention seeking users who may or not be sock-puppets

[1714641624]

1714641624

[JollyGood]

Adkinsbet have just posted in their thread using 7 different sock-puppet accounts then locked the thread after starting a new page that shows just 2 sock-puppet posts that wrote nonsense  

Ray from Adkinsbet created their thread on 17th December 2020 and on 2nd February 2021 they locked it after a massive 112 pages of sock-puppet pumping left it with no reputation at all!

In total, that thread lasted for 47 days and had a total of 2222 posts which works out at an unbelievable +47 posts per day. What absolute nonsense from Adkinsbet.

Ah well, let us see what happens next because they have not resolved any of the scam accusation I listed above and will no doubt return here at some point to start all over again....

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5290408.0

[JollyGood]

There are so many sock-puppets and shills but what is the point of listing them all?

Look at the state of this "Adkinsbet" thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5290408.0

Here we are with just some of the sock-puppets. With the exception of the Adkinsbet account, the others all posted within minutes of them locking the thread and then then never signed in again 

Just take a look at the Last Active in all the images....

[Adzivu]

I just "love" their last post.
They are acting as a victim there.

[JollyGood]

Do you mean final post by Ray from Adkinsbet?

If so then yes you are right Adkinsbet are looking like they ran out of excuses to address the scam accusations and they decided to blame their exit from the forum on DT members putting pressure on them 

I just "love" their last post.
They are acting as a victim there.

[BitcoinAccepted]

Do you mean final post by Ray from Adkinsbet?

If so then yes you are right Adkinsbet are looking like they ran out of excuses to address the scam accusations and they decided to blame their exit from the forum on DT members putting pressure on them 

I just "love" their last post.
They are acting as a victim there.

Nice work, Jollygood.

Adkinsbet indicated they willing to solve the problems, but it looks like you keep on pushing and constantly making false accusations against them and give negative tags for no reasons.

Now it seems they have left the forum and people can only settle issues directly with them.

So again, well done Jollygood, thanks to you some players can not solve their cases any more on the forum.

[examplens]

Nice work, Jollygood.

Adkinsbet indicated they willing to solve the problems, but it looks like you keep on pushing and constantly making false accusations against them and give negative tags for no reasons.

Now it seems they have left the forum and people can only settle issues directly with them.

So again, well done Jollygood, thanks to you some players can not solve their cases any more on the forum.

Which false accusations?
If you read carefully, most of the accusations Adkinsbet confirmed. In some case, they promise money back to users. (Of course, nothing happened. they just tried to get out by lying). In case they have evidence that they are all false accusations, why he does not expose it all and keep a positive reputation here?
You accuse JollyGood of pushing on them, but you are paid to shill for obvious scammers. Can you see the difference?

[actmyname]

Adkinsbet indicated they willing to solve the problems, but it looks like you keep on pushing and constantly making false accusations against them and give negative tags for no reasons.

Now it seems they have left the forum and people can only settle issues directly with them.

So again, well done Jollygood, thanks to you some players can not solve their cases any more on the forum.

Agreed. Why not persist in the event of shadiness when you can just deny responsibility after you were given tangible consequences?

Never mind the ToS spam.

[Vod]

So again, well done Jollygood, thanks to you some players can not solve their cases any more on the forum.

Stupid Jollygood, bothering scammers until they leave. 

BitcoinAccepted - petition Theymos.  The forum does not moderate scams, but newbies should still be allowed to lose their coin, right?

[JollyGood]

  *bump*

Updated the OP

So again, well done Jollygood, thanks to you some players can not solve their cases any more on the forum.

Stupid Jollygood, bothering scammers until they leave. 

BitcoinAccepted - petition Theymos.  The forum does not moderate scams, but newbies should still be allowed to lose their coin, right?

[JollyGood]

AdkinsBET sock-puppets have now resorted to support scam accusations against rival websites 

I think 1xbit is by far the number 1 among the crook gangs. The worst part is that they don't have a gambling license. How can you have so much confidence in a site then? There are also sites without a license that do have a certain track record. Unfortunately, people don't read reviews before posting. BETB2B doesn't care about it either and they happily let 1xbit go their way. Understandable, given that you get a Revenue share.

[JollyGood]

The sock-puppet operator promoting and shilling for the Adkinsbet scammers is not getting tired... yet  

~AdkinsBET
~aomakun
~BitcoinAccepted
~BlackFor3st
~BTCGOLD
~Cacingkemi
~codegnome
~coin.princess
~cutesgirl
~deadthings
~gadado
~imutlinda
~jollyg00d
~MI6
~nasipadang
~ongkok87
~pranjicka
~ronaldo40
~sempak
~wildan88

Most of the usual Adkinsbet trolls and sock-puppets listed above posted in their updated self-moderated scam thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5322032.0

The only positive to come from browsing their new attempt to scam is that their other sock-puppet accounts have been tagged:

~dj_koso
~mikelsmith2020

[JollyGood]

yayayo: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=101572
Of the last 100 posts, 36 have been in known scammers Adkinsbet threads and there is no mention of their scams instead there ignorance and subtle propaganda


ufaiz50: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=858014
Of the last 100 posts, 41 have been in known scammers Adkinsbet threads and there is no mention of their scams instead there ignorance and subtle propaganda

Already added these two to my distrust list:

~yayayo
~ufaiz50

[JollyGood]

 

Here is ufaiz50 making a post immediately after I tag his account with red trust.

Instead of asking why I accused him of being a sock-puppet operated by Adkinsbet scammers he did something unsurprising - he posted in another self-moderated thread set up by the Adkinsbet scammers:

Adkinsbet, can you please check my account, I made a withdrawal request but its not processed yet. It was about 10 hours ago that I made the request.
My username is: dj_koso

Did you receive the money?

If I check your message, it is about 16 hours now so that should be the time for a bookie to pay, depending on the amount.

Withdrawal received. Thanks for your information here on the forum. I prefer to keep the amount anonymous, since it was a decent amount.
That would explain probably why it took a bit longer, but in the end all good. Now I have confidence to deposit again on this site and try my luck again.

It might be a good idea for people to share their experience about this bookmaker in this topic, regarding withdrawals. Amount that has been withdrawn, and also the timeframe. That could help to built a overview on how fast Adkinsbet will process withdrawals up to which amount. I think people want to know that kind of information.

That is a good idea. I am also curious about the withdrawal fee, DJ_koso, how much fee did you had to pay for your withdrawal? Or did the site cover the whole fee for your transaction?
The fee is incredible high on the blockchain since the 50k marker was passed.

[JollyGood]

Here the number of posts some of the sock-puppets and paid shills are making to either support or to create misdirection for Adkinsbet.

Some wear signatures and avatars of other websites in the hope of trying to show they are not connected to the Adkinsbet scammers. They try to blend in as regular members but they are either being operated by Adkinsbet or are paid shills.

I checked their previous 100 posts and none are criticising in nature on the contrary many are openly or subliminally complimentary of the Adkinsbet scammers:

Lavander: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=669236;sa=showPosts
26 of previous 100 posts are for the Adkinsbet scammers

VanityWallets2015: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=435792;sa=showPosts
27 of previous 100 posts are for the Adkinsbet scammers

pungopete468: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=194388;sa=showPosts
27 of previous 100 posts are for the Adkinsbet scammers

zidanw: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=919959;sa=showPosts
28 of previous 100 posts are for the Adkinsbet scammers

MI6: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=756924;sa=showPosts
36 of previous 100 posts are for the Adkinsbet scammers

aomakun: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=897809;sa=showPosts
38 of previous 100 posts are for the Adkinsbet scammers

ufaiz50: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=858014;sa=showPosts
44 of previous 100 posts are for the Adkinsbet scammers

BitcoinAccepted: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=139132;sa=showPosts
46 of previous 100 posts are for the Adkinsbet scammers

BlackFor3st: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=148841;sa=showPosts
46 of previous 100 posts are for the Adkinsbet scammers

codegnome: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=81910;sa=showPosts
49 of previous 100 posts are for the Adkinsbet scammers

ongkok87: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=918119;sa=showPosts
50 of previous 100 posts are for the Adkinsbet scammers

ronaldo40: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=373301;sa=showPosts
50 of previous 100 posts are for the Adkinsbet scammers

imutlinda: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=897892;sa=showPosts
52 of previous 100 posts are for the Adkinsbet scammers


I will add other sock-puppet and paid shills accounts as and when time permits...

[JollyGood]

Here are more accounts operated the Adkinsbet scammers listed below with how many of their previous 100 posts are used to promote the Adkinsbet scammers. Some posts are made to attack reputable casino and gaming websites but none are unsurprisingly critical of the scammers:

pungopete468: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=194388;sa=showPosts
30 of previous 100 posts are for the Adkinsbet scammers

qory: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=412318;sa=showPosts
32 of previous 100 posts are for the Adkinsbet scammers