Despicable Congress

[BADecker]

Any Congress that holds a former President in such contempt, when he has done as many great and wonderful things that Trump did, is a contemptible Congress.

How can a Congress be that way? But they are, and they have fallen to the love of money racket. They are impeaching a President that they formally won't accept as President. It's like they are saying, "Bad dog. You didn't do what we wanted."

The people should be doing recalls on their Congressmen right now.

[1714597123]

1714597123

[1714597123]

1714597123

[1714597123]

1714597123

[1714597123]

1714597123

[franky1]

no congressman is involved with the impeachment today
maybe you will learn its at a higher board level known as the senate now

oh. and they are not judging on prisonable penalties. they are only judging on if he should continue to receive the privileges he gets from the civil office of 'former president'

with trumps actions in regards to insighting violence and insurrection.. EG 'liberate your state' 'fight' 'be strong' 'dont let them when at any cost'

i do feel that he was using his fangirls.
and then when it didnt go his way. he disassociated from his fangirls

so if your still a fan. just realise that he wont be your friend in the end.
and if you do manage to cause chaos in his name. he will just send the national guard to arrest you

[Cnut237]

Any Congress that holds a former President in such contempt, when he has done as many great and wonderful things that Trump did, is a contemptible Congress.

FTFY: Any former President that holds Congress in such contempt, when it has done as many great and wonderful things as Congress did, is a contemptible former President.

They are impeaching a President that they formally won't accept as President. It's like they are saying, "Bad dog. You didn't do what we wanted."

FTFY: They are impeaching a President that won't accept he lost a fair and democratic election, and then attempted to stage a coup in order to retain power. It's like they are saying, "Look at the facts."


Seriously though, his behaviour in instigating an attempted coup—and that's what it was—was sufficiently egregious that even some Republican senators voted for impeachment. But I agree that the outcome won't be fair. There's no chance of that two thirds majority voting to convict, as the senators begin the familiar split back towards voting along traditional party lines.

Regardless of my tongue-in-cheek comments above, and regardless of the details of this particular case, and whether or not he is guilty, a two party political system can never be healthy or fair. It is forever oppositional, and more interested in subduing the opponent than in brokering compromise.

[Vatimins]

     Trump's actions are the reason why it uas come to this. There clearly is something wrong with the guy's head for doing or saying what he did the caused a lot of chaos amd other branching problems. It is always you reap what you sow. Had he not said or done those things, then he wouldn't be in a type of situation like his today. It's that simple. The senate is composed by many heads and not all of them are too smart, too dumb or too biased to make unreasonable decisions, and take note that every ruling needs to be voted for before it comes to pass.

[franky1]

badecker seems to have things warped

in 2016. obama accepted trumps win..
it was trump in 2020 that did not accept bidens win

meaning republicans didnt accept democrates
..

also badecker says trump done many good things.. but i bet he cant think of any that personally benefit badecker.. but some allow badeckers cultish leaders to get richer.. even while leaving badecker poor.

badecker when will you figure out your repeating of your influencers wishes actually negatively affect your life while making them profit

[BADecker]

badecker seems to have things warped

in 2016. obama accepted trumps win..
it was trump in 2020 that did not accept bidens win

meaning republicans didnt accept democrates
..

also badecker says trump done many good things.. but i bet he cant think of any that personally benefit badecker.. but some allow badeckers cultish leaders to get richer.. even while leaving badecker poor.

badecker when will you figure out your repeating of your influencers wishes actually negatively affect your life while making them profit

Obama might have said he accepted Trump's win, and maybe he even did accept Trump's win, but behind the scenes he is fighting what Trump is doing as hard as he can.

But Biden is way worse than Obama. Biden didn't accept Trump's win, as all the election fraud proves.

[Tzupy]

Senator Charles Ellis Schumer should be impeached!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQMp3hCXk04

[franky1]

Senator Charles Ellis Schumer should be impeached!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQMp3hCXk04

although the youtuber is not actaully a civil officer to be able to actually file an impeachment claim. (yep only a civil officer can file the claim) what it does prove is that trump can be impeached, because even the youtuber realises that trump still holds an office and the impeachment allows for trump to lose 'any office'

yep. sorry trumpettes. but your lil youtuber just proved that trump can lose his 'office of former president' by how the youtuber made his video showing that its not just about sitting presidents or losing a previous office where the crimes happened.

..
gotta love it when trumpettes own words shoot their opinions in their own foot

[Tzupy]

Despicable Democrats... they were supposed to call witnesses, but when Trump lawyers asked for calling Pelosi and Bowser, which would have exposed the staging of the Capitol riot, they backed down.

[sirazimuth]

Despicable Democrats... they were supposed to call witnesses, but when Trump lawyers asked for calling Pelosi and Bowser, which would have exposed the staging of the Capitol riot, they backed down.

The dems cant be bothered.
They know there's enough republican toadies who would never vote to convict their Trump god, even if that asshole shat on the Lincoln Memorial.
After all, they (retrumplicans) don't want to get "primaried", or whatever that term is for politically destroying
republicans who vote their conscience rather than supporting a despicable stain on their party.

btw teddy boy, where's the BREAKING link to some retarded q-anon conspiracy theory website?

[Gyfts]

Despicable Democrats... they were supposed to call witnesses, but when Trump lawyers asked for calling Pelosi and Bowser, which would have exposed the staging of the Capitol riot, they backed down.

They really weren't suppose to call witnesses because if they did, then they would be hauling Trump's ass down to testify which is a nightmare. He'd probably ramble on and self incriminate himself despite  him not being criminally liable for the riots.

Although, I would LOVE for Nancy Pelosi and the DC mayor to testify and see if they knew about any threats to the capitol and why they weren't inclined to station more troops there.

[franky1]

seems they voted against impeachment under the presumption that he cant be impeached because he is not a sitting officer.

but he actually is a sitting officer. with privileges.
if those that were pushing to find guilt actually rebutted the 'not an officer' claim by highlighting he does have a current office and privilege. it would have swayed another 10 into the guilty vote.

trump is not just a private citizen. as he does hold 'office of former president' where that office is funded by government and comes with government privilege. thus he is a civil officer

..
time to move on i guess. but seems they gave up easy.
thus thinking whats the point of impeachments. if the 'loophole' is simply demoting yourself from a higher position to a lower position

i can see UK government using this too. departmental ministers in charge of some high office things. demote(resign) their ministerial office and retain their member of parliament status to avoid being expelled from all politics..
.. oh wait. i see they already do this.

so government representatives have get out of jail free cards

[BADecker]

If they impeach Trump, without finding a place where he broke his Oath of Office to impeach him on, they are breaking their Oaths of Office.

[Cnut237]

seems they voted against impeachment under the presumption that he cant be impeached because he is not a sitting officer.

Whatever reasons were given are irrelevant. Beneath it all, this was simply the usual voting along party lines. Predictable and depressing. Not just because Trump's behaviour in this instance was quite extreme and certainly deserved a genuine hearing, but also the wider issue: if this isn't impeachable behaviour, then what is? The answer is: nothing is. You suspect that even if a president (whether Republican or Democrat) goes on a drug-fuelled killing spree and uploads the evidence to youtube, then senators will still vote along party lines. Clear impeachable behaviour to one side is perfect behaviour with no wrongdoing to the other side. And they make their decisions based not on logic, not on evidence, but purely on which party the accused represents. Absurd. Laughable, were it not so tragic. 'Democracy' is of course nothing of the sort, as evidenced by events like this.

[franky1]

seems they voted against impeachment under the presumption that he cant be impeached because he is not a sitting officer.

Whatever reasons were given are irrelevant. Beneath it all, this was simply the usual voting along party lines. Predictable and depressing.

it shows republicans fear their own bosses more than the citizens. it shows republicans are not interested in the health and safety and wishes of citizens. and only puppet what their leaders want.

im stil shocked trump even has loyalists still. even when it has been shown time and time again after he has used his puppets. when they get in trouble for following him. he just steps back and denounces any association to them. leaving them alone to take the flack for his wishes

[B1tUnl0ck3r]

Any Congress that holds a former President in such contempt, when he has done as many great and wonderful things that Trump did, is a contemptible Congress.

How can a Congress be that way? But they are, and they have fallen to the love of money racket. They are impeaching a President that they formally won't accept as President. It's like they are saying, "Bad dog. You didn't do what we wanted."

The people should be doing recalls on their Congressmen right now.

if you want things to change you will have to kill them all, but first you will have to KILL flyinghellfish. and you know it if you weren't a bot/mental injured. fuck you fly, I may get you one day, but resst assured not personnally... your whole nation. have fun and (suicide yourself, it would be easier).

[BADecker]

Any Congress that holds a former President in such contempt, when he has done as many great and wonderful things that Trump did, is a contemptible Congress.

How can a Congress be that way? But they are, and they have fallen to the love of money racket. They are impeaching a President that they formally won't accept as President. It's like they are saying, "Bad dog. You didn't do what we wanted."

The people should be doing recalls on their Congressmen right now.

if you want things to change you will have to kill them all, but first you will have to KILL flyinghellfish. and you know it if you weren't a bot/mental injured. fuck you fly, I may get you one day, but resst assured not personnally... your whole nation. have fun and (suicide yourself, it would be easier).

People need two things to recall:
1. The knowledge that they can recall;
2. Anger.

[Tzupy]

GOP Ranking Members Demand Pelosi Explain Why She Refuses to Turn Over Documents on US Capitol Security and Why She Delayed National Guard Response for One Hour During Siege
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/02/gop-ranking-members-send-letter-pelosi-refused-protect-us-capitol-jan-6-delayed-national-guard-response-one-hour-siege/

[Vod]

People need two things to recall:
1. The knowledge that they can recall;
2. Anger.

I see you recalling quotes from a fairy tale constantly.   Finally the reason - what are you angry at?

[BADecker]

People need two things to recall:
1. The knowledge that they can recall;
2. Anger.

I see you recalling quotes from a fairy tale constantly.   Finally the reason - what are you angry at?

I see you not being clear, as is often your standard. What I mean is this:

When God created the world and universe, he spoke the parts of it into being, like: "Let there be light." This means that we can look at the world and see that God is good. The things He spoke into being give us all kinds of pleasure. But we also have pain and hardship. So. what might be going on?

The Word of God that made the universe gives us hints. It doesn't speak directly and clearly. It doesn't tell us directly what is going on. We can get all kinds of ideas from the hints, but because we don't know the language of the physics of the universe... although we are finding some of it out by examination and testing... we often can't find some of the important points about what is going on in life.

The Bible is different. It gives us many of the words of God in a direct way so that we can understand the important things in life. Not everything of the universe is printed in the Bible. But the whole Word of God is essentially there, some of it in brief, and some of it clear and detailed. Most important is, there are vital things in the Word of God - things that tell us about life and how it works - that can be found and understood nowhere else besides the Bible.

I'm sure you can inform us all regarding the fairy tales you are speaking of, and why you don't understand that people who become angry at their elected representatives recall them sometimes.


Recall Newsom Effort Gains Enough Signatures To Trigger Special Election In California

Randy Economy, the senior adviser and official media spokesman for Recall Gavin 2020, told Fox News on Saturday that the campaign has received around 1,509,000 signatures -- more than the required amount. Organizers said they expect to have 1.6 million signatures by Sunday. -Fox News

Now it's up to the California Secretary of State's office to process the signatures and determine if they are valid.

Organizers are hoping to get 2 million signatures by mid-march in order to have a 'comfortable margin' - after the last effort had a 25% disqualification rate among signatures collected.

"We're not there yet. We wanted to take the opportunity to celebrate the milestone along the way. But our job is not done. We're working as hard as today as we were yesterday, and we're going to work harder tomorrow," Economy told Fox News, adding "And if it wasn't for this amazing group of volunteers that have dedicated so much of their lives, we wouldn't have gotten to this point."