Vod can you please provide some compelling evidence now to corroborate your claims that I'm OG nasty.
I've provided
concrete evidence you ran a ponzi, and no one cared. I'm just letting people know who you are.
I ran a ponzi? Wow the things I get up to without knowing about them at all.
What else have I done.
First can you present the robust evidence you have to demonstrate I'm OG?
This ponzi claim is separate. I have not examined it because I'm not all up on this blockchain analysis stuff so I leave that to the boffins
I figured if 2600btc was scammed then more than you would be moaning and OG would be in some deep shit.
But either way that's not the point here.
I simply need to know if I really am OGnasty? Please help me learn the truth.
Show me the completing evidence you have that will force me to acknowledge I am both me and he.
I mean if you have any evidence other than we both keep mentioning you're a trust abuser and coward.
I mean obviously even that corrupt willing scam facilitator for pay nutildah seems to have removed his tag reference and basis for the tag?
Seems he changed his mind ...you cant red tag someone for simply presenting variable truth to another member who has a tag.
He pulled a nutildah on his trust abuse now.
Going for the more sensible you can be red tagged for smelling of html garlic.
That as we know from SS is quite a sensible and credible reason for a red tag.