Explain how it is a rep thread??
Not even gonna bother the rest, but the reason why it is a reputation-based thread is because it has nothing to do about the forum itself, but rather on DT members.
And you're ranting and blabbering, which I think you should stop. You're being a dick in your own arse. do something better in life honestly.
Of course hilarious would move it, just like she would mark bad a report of suchmoon stalking and spamming every thread I make with conclusively debunked and off topic claims and to stop debating with my trolling posts. Then running away from any debates I attempt to draw her into. I mean clearly that proven scammer supporter and protector is scared of any real examination into her behavior. (Suchmoon , although hilarious knowingly kept proven scammers on his DT includes list and supported them against members that presented independently verifiable evidence of their scamming so not much better really )
If you're not going to believe what I say then there's no point trying to interact with me. There's dozens of mods here. I generally ignore any reports on you or from you and whatever alt you're using this month because I can't be bothered reading through your blabble most of the time so your beef should be with whatever other mods have handled them, but in most cases I see it's you that's in the wrong and not them. And why have you started misgendering me? That is a very serious offence and will likely earn you negative feedback from timelord.
If hilarious says they would do something where I am concerned or not doing something you can be sure the opposite of what they say is correct fair and optimal. So thanks for chiming in to verify I was correct to post it here in meta.
Then why would I waste my time on this. If I say the earth is round then you're going to try argue it's flat. You're congratulating yourself on winning a game where you don't know the rules and you will pronounce yourself the victor regardless of performance.
OP is not OgNasty. It's cryptohunter on his ~10th account.
I disagree. CH had a hard on for you, not me. OG is jealous of us both.
It's not OG, unless OG is putting a lot of effort into trying to expertly appear like CH. CH has a beef with most people here: Staff, People on DT, anyone with a sig, anyone who merited someone or something he doesn't like and the list goes on.
Lol well I believe you would move it as I said. You haven't debunked my points as to why it is not a rep thread and is clearly a meta thread.
You don't really interact. You say something like or similar to " well ch is wrong about everything my friends who I include on DT are not scammers and he is a troll for saying they are"
Then when the independently verifiable evidence demonstrates they are undeniably scammers and ch is telling the truth and not trolling, then you just run off.
Same with this meta or rep. I have just explained why it was was clearly a meta thread not an individuals rep thread.
You've not attempted to debunk those points or field a counter argument.
You just said well if you dont believe I would call it a rep thread then why talk to me?
It would be like you claiming the earth was flat.
I come along and present the math and physics plus video evidence from space that it's a sphere and you just repeat that if i dont believe that you believe its flat, then no point debating it or examining the data further. You then say you just claim to be correct that the earth is a sphere because you dont understand the rules lol
Produce a specific account here and now where you can conclusively debunk " ch , mine, our? " core points on anything important at all . It must be easy if ch is always wrong and everyone else is in the right ? Maybe you are just mixed up ? You mean ch has never had a core point conclusively debunked because he only speaks the truth?
I'll wait.
You can't just say I think x therefore x is correct and expect that to be the end of it.
I have a beef with observable double standards and unfair bias.
If you're not afraid of transparent public debate then produce a clear point that I have made that you can conclusively debunk?
It is entirely true and easily demonstrable that you sided with proven scammers over whistleblowers and included those people on DT whilst attempting to brand the undeniable truth as trolling. It was despicable. Dont act like you're the good guy here.
You can't side with trust abusing scammers over their whistleblowers to the point of joining in claiming the independently verifiable truth is trolling and ensuring those scammers stay on DT then be the good guy hilarious.
Tman claimed you're called Hillary. I thought you guys were pals, well before he blew a gasket at you finally before quitting.
If that's not the case then fair enough.
Remember TOAA made a record of all of its deleted posts about 30 ish?? Not one was demonstrated to be off topic irrelevant was it? Go have a look.
If you are ignoring all reports about this account and from it then FAIR enough. That is a big improvement.
Blabble = independently verifiable truth ? Okay.
Yes you seem to have improved now your pals have gone but you have been an undeniably biased and corrupt mod in the past.
Weirdly looking back over your history you were also on the launch of doge. I cant believe you're still needing 2 accounts maxed out with sigs and avatar rev streams.
If it wasnt you then fair enough just stay out of my way unless I break the rules and stop talking shit about me being wrong and not debunking a single core point I've made. That's just crazy talk.
Moderators actions should be transparent. It is sneaky to take action against a member and then when they come to meta with a genuine and legitmate question about the why or who they all hide up.
If you want to be paid as a mod then stand behind your actions. I mean what action can be taken against you anyway? You can delete any abuse and ban people I mean its like a giant saying they fear reprisals from a toddler. Just an excuse to take action with zero responsibility.
Transparent objective standards that ensure consistent and fair treatment of all members should be the primary goal of this forum.
Blabbering they say.
People here are full of shit generally. Their prime tactic is abstract not specific accusations.
When you push them to bring specific examples they run away.
No more of that. Any claims people make will be drilled down hard on.
It is irrelevant if I am the ch or not. Just examine the argument and evidence contained within the post and examine it yourselves.
The content is important not who delivers it. If it is independently verifiable then who posts it doesnt matter.
@ vile vixen aka agent foxpup
....errrrr okay I admit it ..I'm.....O...O. ...O.....Oh i need some wipes. Chat later.
