Campaign to exclude Vod from DT. Please join me.

[TalkStar]

Thank you very much for your support. I sent all sendible merits that I had to all of you. Also I removed my negative feedback from VOD's profile. I guess there is no way to convince him that his feedback must be removed as well. Someone please merit OG on my behalf because I am out of merits.

If you think that someone will take your side for getting merit from you then yeah you will get some people's participation here but thats not gonna help you in your case for sure. Its look like you are giving donation for supporting you which is completely wrong. You should learn about the perfect use of smerit first and see how others spending from their vault.

I have been accused of being the alt of at least 10 persons. Now someone called korner was added to that list. I already asked admins to check my registration IP and if it will match with scammers accounts, I will post an official excuse and leave this forum forever.

Its your choice to leave the forum or not but i don't think its a proper solution.

[Vod]

Its your choice to leave the forum or not but i don't think its a proper solution.

Get the BPIP extension and you'd see he was banned a day or so ago.

[Laudanum]

I don't give a s...t. If you think hi is not guilty than god will judge everyone. He knows everything! He sees everything! He hears everything! And He has the very right answer to everything.

God will judge you for not calling the police on me and saving those poor helpless children.  You are a sick fuck that needs to die. 

That is a bit heavy vod. You shouldn't be saying things that could be construed as a threat of harm or worse.

I expected such a reaction from you OG.  You have been campaigning for years to decriminalize pedophilia, and I have always spoke out against it.   People who protect people who rape children should be killed.   Edmonton State Police:  780-423-4567

Can you show me the evidence where OG has sought to decriminalise pedophilia? Or just more voices in your head? That sounds like a serious allegation.

So then you claim it certainly isn't you being referenced in that online complaint? Nothing to do with you at all?

This person seems to be admonishing you for allegedly doing something pedo ish,  so you say that he should be killed for protecting paedophiles? I see.

Stop trying to divert attention away from your own actions.
Once these have been transparently analysed then people can make up their minds on the best course of action.

[Vod]

Can you show me the evidence where OG has sought to decriminalise pedophilia?

You've been accusing me of raping children for years, but you don't believe it's criminal.

[TalkStar]

Stop trying to divert attention away from your own actions.
Once these have been transparently analysed then people can make up their minds on the best course of action.

Don't you think you are trying to change te meaning of "transparent" in your own way?

People are analyzing through their own mind but it seems to me that you are not happy with the result.

[Vod]

Now I am more than convinced that all that accusation regarding VOD are nothing but the truth. Because of that he deserves to be reported here. https://www.facebook.com/antipedoalliance/ Also find the list of pedo fighters here. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_pedophile_advocacy_organizations. If you need his detail just follow the reference of feedback left by kulmena on his trust page. Untrusted feedbacks. Now go ahead and red tag or ban me, because of touching your untouchable and lovely VOD.  I don't give a s...t. If you think hi is not guilty than god will judge everyone. He knows everything! He sees everything! He hears everything! And He has the very right answer to everything.

kruglikov, I really hope you didn't do what you claimed:
Reported him with his real name to all organizations mentioned in reference. Please join me.

These organizations are used for revenge all the time like this, and they are well aware of what ripoffreport is.  If any law enforcement contacts recognize my name from the past (been online since the 90s) they will reach out and I'll have to show the threads that will probably get OGNasty injured.

Is that what you wanted?   Some people do think pedophilia is a crime, and they won't look fondly on his campaign to normalize it.  

[Quickseller]

You don't agree with the feedback, yet you support his inclusion into DT thereby supporting his feedback...

This is something that should be discussed, though. The true threshold of unwarranted ratings that will make people start to question inclusions.

How many "bad ratings" should a single person get away with? What standards should the ratings uphold? Would be good to apply this to everyone in DefaultTrust, active or prospective, and see which members have a high percentage of false positives toward supposed scammers (or rather, false negatives). In reality, we should always redundantly tag accounts rather than relying on single points of failure. We should always move towards decentralization as opposed to against.

I think it should be clarified that there is a substantial difference between preemptively tagging someone and subsequently removing a tag after further consideration and/or additional evidence coming to light, and tagging someone wrongly and leaving the tag on the account.

In this case, I have not seen any posts from Vod even trying to defend his tag, and I have not seen anyone who supports Vod ask him publicly to reconsider his tag, or to try to defend his tag. Over the years, there have been other similar cases, in which Vod left a questionable tag, and he was never even pressured to defend his tag, his defenders simply said that Vod has left a lot of good ratings in the past, and that they are going to look past the questionable tag. There have also been other situations in which someone received a questionable tag from Vod, handled the situation poorly, and subsequently received additional tags after trolling and/or deciding to rage quit. The later is especially bad for the community because it effectively removes people from the community really for no reason.

To answer your question, I think someone shouldn't be able to get away with many "bad ratings". I don't think this should be a percentage, but rather a raw number, and that number should be very low. I would also view a "bad rating" that is being defended but may not necessarily agree with differently than a "bad rating" in which is not being defended. IMO the later should be viewed much more harshly, and should not be tolerated.

[kruglikov]

Kruglikov, I really hope you didn't do what you claimed:
Reported him with his real name to all organizations mentioned in reference. Please join me.

These organizations are used for revenge all the time like this, and they are well aware of what ripoffreport is.  If any law enforcement contacts recognize my name from the past (been online since the 90s) they will reach out and I'll have to show the threads that will probably get OGNasty injured.

Is that what you wanted?   Some people do think pedophilia is a crime, and they won't look fondly on his campaign to normalize it.  

Yes Martin I contacted all of them. Also I was chatting with a head of this Alliance https://www.facebook.com/antipedoalliance/ He promised me to investigate that matter. I did that because a lot of people including me are really interested if you are really guilty of that accusations or not. And I do not care how you will explain your past and present activities to any law enforcement. And yes Pedophilia is a crime.

Activities related to the sexual exploitation of children, shall be punished by death or imprisoned for not less than 30 years or for life.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2251

Enjoi...

[suchmoon]

To answer your question, I think someone shouldn't be able to get away with many "bad ratings". I don't think this should be a percentage, but rather a raw number, and that number should be very low. I would also view a "bad rating" that is being defended but may not necessarily agree with differently than a "bad rating" in which is not being defended. IMO the later should be viewed much more harshly, and should not be tolerated.

This is so absurdly specific, probably a projection based on something you've done.

A bad rating/flag is bad regardless if it's defended by the person who posted it, "supporters", sockpuppets, what have you. A good rating/flag is good regardless of who may try to discredit it.

[Vod]

Kruglikov, I really hope you didn't do what you claimed:
Reported him with his real name to all organizations mentioned in reference. Please join me.

These organizations are used for revenge all the time like this, and they are well aware of what ripoffreport is.  If any law enforcement contacts recognize my name from the past (been online since the 90s) they will reach out and I'll have to show the threads that will probably get OGNasty injured.

Is that what you wanted?   Some people do think pedophilia is a crime, and they won't look fondly on his campaign to normalize it.  

Yes Martin I contacted all of them. Also I was chatting with a head of this Alliance https://www.facebook.com/antipedoalliance/ He promised me to investigate that matter. I did that because a lot of people including me are really interested if you are really guilty of that accusations or not. And I do not care how you will explain your past and present activities to any law enforcement. And yes Pedophilia is a crime.

Activities related to the sexual exploitation of children, shall be punished by death or imprisoned for not less than 30 years or for life.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2251

Enjoi...

Og's death will be on your hands if the radicals get to him first.   Hope he has bullet proof windows.  :/

[Quickseller]

To answer your question, I think someone shouldn't be able to get away with many "bad ratings". I don't think this should be a percentage, but rather a raw number, and that number should be very low. I would also view a "bad rating" that is being defended but may not necessarily agree with differently than a "bad rating" in which is not being defended. IMO the later should be viewed much more harshly, and should not be tolerated.

This is so absurdly specific, probably a projection based on something you've done.

A bad rating/flag is bad regardless if it's defended by the person who posted it, "supporters", sockpuppets, what have you. A good rating/flag is good regardless of who may try to discredit it.

The question of if a rating is good or bad is subjective. Different people view things different ways. Someone not defending a questionable rating is a sign they don't actually believe in the rating, but are rather leaving the rating up for personal reasons.

[kruglikov]

Og's death will be on your hands if the radicals get to him first.   Hope he has bullet proof windows.  :/

Can we consider this as a official death threat from you against OG? (Screenshotted) And the first person they will visit it's you as I understood. Call police Martin and ask for protection and purchase some surveillance cameras.

[Laudanum]

Can you show me the evidence where OG has sought to decriminalise pedophilia?

You've been accusing me of raping children for years, but you don't believe it's criminal.

Evidence vod that OG has said this not you just repeating yourself.

Bring some independently verifiable evidence.

If not you are trolling OG.

Not to mention claiming he should be killed?

Are you off your meds.

[Vod]

Evidence vod that OG has said this not you just repeating yourself.

Yes OG, Vod has the evidence.   So do many others - do you forget every post is recorded other than by Theymos?

[Laudanum]

Evidence vod that OG has said this not you just repeating yourself.

Yes OG, Vod has the evidence.   So do many others - do you forget every post is recorded other than by Theymos?

Produce please. Now.

[Vod]

Produce please. Now.

Or what OG?  You'll shame me as a pedo but recommend no one charge me criminally?   

[Laudanum]

Produce please. Now.

Or what OG?  You'll shame me as a pedo but recommend no one charge me criminally?  

I can't claim to know what OG will or will not do.

It seems you are going around in circles.

Let me recap.

1. I'm not OG
2. I've seen no credible or strong evidence that you are a pedo
3. I've not seen OG claim you are a pedo but pedo is not criminal anyway so you should not be reported.

Therefore until any of those things are supported by independently verifiable evidence I am not sure what to think.

You look stupid claiming all of those things without producing evidence when called upon.

Understand that. Then work from there.

[Vod]

I can't claim to know what OG will or will not do.

Unless you're horny, then you realize you could be him.   

[Vod]

Yes Martin I contacted all of them. Also I was chatting with a head of this Alliance https://www.facebook.com/antipedoalliance/ He promised me to investigate that matter. I did that because a lot of people including me are really interested if you are really guilty of that accusations or not. And I do not care how you will explain your past and present activities to any law enforcement. And yes Pedophilia is a crime.

Kruglikov lied (Og - I'm sure you knew that) but it did make me realize that one day a vigilante group might not review the history and believe these claims.  So I have decided to document the ongoing pedophile promotion on this forum before it all vanishes into history.   

Going forward, I have decided to accept OgNasty's continued offer of helping fundraise for my health, and hope all the Nastyfans out there will help promote my (loaded?) book on youtube and other social media!

[eddie13]

Kruglikov, I really hope you didn't do what you claimed:
Reported him with his real name to all organizations mentioned in reference. Please join me.

These organizations are used for revenge all the time like this, and they are well aware of what ripoffreport is.  If any law enforcement contacts recognize my name from the past (been online since the 90s) they will reach out and I'll have to show the threads that will probably get OGNasty injured.

Is that what you wanted?   Some people do think pedophilia is a crime, and they won't look fondly on his campaign to normalize it.  

Yes Martin I contacted all of them. Also I was chatting with a head of this Alliance https://www.facebook.com/antipedoalliance/ He promised me to investigate that matter. I did that because a lot of people including me are really interested if you are really guilty of that accusations or not. And I do not care how you will explain your past and present activities to any law enforcement. And yes Pedophilia is a crime.

Activities related to the sexual exploitation of children, shall be punished by death or imprisoned for not less than 30 years or for life.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2251

Enjoi...

Vod should be scared because when this scary Russian guy called all the lawyers and shit on me they interrogated me for 6 weeks straight..

NOT!!

What a jerkoff loser..