MYCRYPTOMIXER SCAM! 13 BTC LOST USING HIS MIXER

[alphabet22]

Its surprising how many accounts in this forum trying to defend the mixer website and attacking the guy who lost his coins. .
Some of the accounts created the same day they posted on this post to attack the OP
This makes me think the mixer site is fishy.
And probably the owner of the mixer is the same guy using alts to attack the OP.

[LoyceV]

Have once again reached out to Mycryptomixer via email with a few questions and heard nothing.

Did you ask the same questions as before? This post was pretty clear:

Unless you are willing to provide additional evidence, I will not be repeating myself on the same topics over and over again.

Funds have not left the wallet address I sent the coins to. Seems like someone is waiting for things to die down before moving them -- an unlikely pattern for a phishing scheme.

None of this matters to your scam accusation as long as you don't have a signed Letter of Guarantee.

[nutildah]

None of this matters to your scam accusation as long as you don't have a signed Letter of Guarantee.

Don't you think the sideshow happening here is pretty entertaining though? Why haven't the coins moved? Why would somebody create/use throwaway accounts to baselessly attack OP's reputation? That was weird AF.

Perhaps it would be better it OP retitled the thread to something more factually accurate. It's technically not possible (as far as I know) to determine the owner of the address at the moment.

[alphabet22]

None of this matters to your scam accusation as long as you don't have a signed Letter of Guarantee.

Don't you think the sideshow happening here is pretty entertaining though? Why haven't the coins moved? Why would somebody create/use throwaway accounts to baselessly attack OP's reputation? That was weird AF.

Perhaps it would be better it OP retitled the thread to something more factually accurate. It's technically not possible (as far as I know) to determine the owner of the address at the moment.

That's what I thought too.  Why would some new accounts created at same day attack the OP. Obviously to me it has to do something with the mixer
We talking here about 600000$ but the Admin of the mixer avoiding here like if he deal with 600K transactions 100 times a day so it's like nothing to him.

Why the coins not moved ? I think the pw we tof the address where the coins are is watching this thread so he knew some members gonna trace or at least know what's going on if he moved them.

[suchmoon]

Why haven't the coins moved?

If the coins moved you can bet they would move to a mixer. Whether it's MCM stealing them, a hacker stealing them, or the OP playing games - in all of these scenarios it the perp must obfuscate them so any tracking would not be successful. Come to think of it, the "OP playing games" scenario probably has the least incentive for the coins to be moved. If someone stole them there is no reason to wait.

The only other scenario that I can think of is that the OP sent coins to an address no one has private keys for. This would also explain why the coins haven't moved. It's not easy to do accidentally though. A simple typo would result in an valid address.

Anything else we can read from this fact?

[DireWolfM14]

If its a human right, why would the police or a financial institution not allow him to possess such funds in such a situation without proving its origin?

You're a fucking moron, and this sentence proves it.  It's the authorities responsibility to provide proof the funds were obtained nefariously.  You're lowering the average IQ of the forum, and I feel stupider for reading your trolling bullshit.  Now, please get the fuck out of here.

I checked the PGP.

What do you mean by this?  You claim you don't have the letter of guarantee, but you have to download it before you can check if for a valid signature.  Did you or did you not check the signature of the letter?

MCM gives the user a very powerful tool in form of Letter of Guarantee. It is indisputable.

The only "power" the letter offers is proof that the address belongs to the anonymous service.  It doesn't guarantee that you aren't a scammer.

There is no log. Not only because the logs are not stored or the information were deleted. There is no log because the transaction was never tracked by MCM. MCM tracks only the transactions belonging to its own addresses.

Quit beating around the bush, nobody cares about the "ownership" of the address.  Maybe it belongs to MCM, or maybe it belongs to you personally.  Stop trying to hide behind the semantics.  The question is a simple one with a "yes" or "no" answer:  Did you or did you not receive a transaction for 13BTC on or around the date and time the OP's txid?

Had the funds landed in one of MCMs addresses and were not processed for any reason, I would contact you asking for a message signed with sender address describing where the funds should be sent. They have not.

If this were to have happened, how you would you have contacted the user?  Contact information isn't requested by your service.

The rest of the story matches what would have happened if you sent the funds to a malicious website. You should ALWAYS verify the LoG - not only download but also verify against the PGP key. The malicious websites oftentimes give you the LoG with the deposit address changed. Looks the same and is still signed by MCM, but the signature is invalid.

Wait, what?  That's contradictory.  How could it be signed by your service with an invalid signature?  This sounds like a convenient excuse to deflect the blame.

This is one of the weirdest scam accusations I've seen here.  Both the OP and MyCryptoMixer seem to contradict themselves, and getting a strait answer from either seems impossible.

[suchmoon]

Wait, what?  That's contradictory.  How could it be signed by your service with an invalid signature?  This sounds like a convenient excuse to deflect the blame.

I think it just means that there is a signature, possibly lifted from a real LoG but it's not a valid signature for the fake LoG.

[LoyceV]

It's the authorities responsibility to provide proof the funds were obtained nefariously.

Not in all countries. Here it's your own responsibility to prove you've obtained for instance cash legally. Crypto is probably treated in the same way.

Wait, what?  That's contradictory.  How could it be signed by your service with an invalid signature?  This sounds like a convenient excuse to deflect the blame.

I think it just means that there is a signature, possibly lifted from a real LoG but it's not a valid signature for the fake LoG.

That makes sense, I'm pretty sure not all users actually verify the LoG (especially since some users don't even bother downloading it).