I opened the OP link. And I did not quite understand the meaning of his post. The article is dated February 6, 2019. How does this relate to the story with GME and Dogecoin?
What does the author mean by his post? What started?
Generally speaking, there is and will always be abuse, and it is utopian to think that fraud will ever stop.
I just thought that whether I read wrong with what the OP wrote, because I could not find the meaning he was thinking.
but I see you as well as others are also confused by what the OP meant. it means that what the OP wrote does not reflect something clear and will lead to many different perceptions.
if it is asked what to start? Regarding the fraud that occurred, I think it is clear what you have said and I also ensure that fraud will always exist, so it takes law enforcers such as the police, to be able to solve this. but if the dicrypto fraud is clearly difficult and it depends on our ability to be able to avoid it.