Bitcoin Forum
May 10, 2024, 12:03:02 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: How to monitor my stats current vs reported vs averrage vs number of shares ?  (Read 55 times)
the-morpher (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 27, 2021, 11:03:27 AM
 #1

Hello

I can't decide between Phoenixminer and Gminer, in some article i read that mh/s in Phoenixminer is a bit increased and does not reflect the trute, and kinda have feeling that Phoenixminer does generate more stales than Gminer ofthen (well stil 2 stales max in 8 hours).

So my question is how to make my choice ?
Is it based on mh/s ?   Phoenixminer reach 26.555 , Gminer 26.300

---- Phoenixminer log (mh/s is lower when I am using my pc) ----
Eth: Maximum difficulty of found share: 475.6 GH (!)
Eth: Average speed (5 min): 25.415 MH/s
Eth: Effective speed: 26.10 MH/s; at pool: 26.10 MH/s

Eth speed: 25.484 MH/s, shares: 96/0/0, time: 4:03


I stop Phoenixminer and launche Gminer

---- Gminer ------
+------+----+-----+-----------+------+----+-----+-----+-----------+
|  GPU  Temp  Fan     Speed    Shares Core  Mem  Power Efficiency |
+------+----+-----+-----------+------+----+-----+-----+-----------+
|  GPU0 66 C  47 %  25.35 MH/s  1/0/0 1949  4799   N/A        N/A |
+------+----+-----+-----------+------+----+-----+-----+-----------+


Bellow a grah of my Gminer data for yesterday and Phoenixminer for last 4 hours

https://ibb.co/WD0R3MC

What criteria should I be interested about ? current hashrate, average, reported maybe should i count how many shares generated by Gminer vs Phoenixminer during specific time in term of code speed and efficiency

Gtx 1060 6gb superclocked (+0 coreclock, +1000 memoryclock)

Any advice how to monitor my stats?
1715299382
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715299382

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715299382
Reply with quote  #2

1715299382
Report to moderator
1715299382
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715299382

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715299382
Reply with quote  #2

1715299382
Report to moderator
1715299382
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715299382

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715299382
Reply with quote  #2

1715299382
Report to moderator
Each block is stacked on top of the previous one. Adding another block to the top makes all lower blocks more difficult to remove: there is more "weight" above each block. A transaction in a block 6 blocks deep (6 confirmations) will be very difficult to remove.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715299382
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715299382

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715299382
Reply with quote  #2

1715299382
Report to moderator
1715299382
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715299382

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715299382
Reply with quote  #2

1715299382
Report to moderator
1715299382
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715299382

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715299382
Reply with quote  #2

1715299382
Report to moderator
JayDDee
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 220


View Profile
February 27, 2021, 04:25:13 PM
 #2

Count the accepted shares at the pool over a period of time. The longer the time
the more reliable the results. Make sure the stratum difficulty is the same.

Small differences in the miner's reported hashrate mean nothing. Fee differences
have a bigger effect.

Stales or rejects don't really matter if the effective hashrate of valid shares is higher.
But excessive rejects could trigger the pool's DDOS defences and lock you out.

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!