⚖️Bitcasinorank.com - Latest casino test with a real deposit 🔥Bombastic🔥

[Mahdirakib]

Hello everyone!
Please check my new review for Winz.io

You make those reviews by observing the casino only or you are a gambler too? In the ‘Reputation’ part you have given the example of other rating websites. I liked that, but winz.io have only 5 reviews on trustpilot. It's normal to have good ratings from low number of reviews. And you should include some important information of their TOS in your review. As example, the details of KYC policy, Dormant Accounts, multiple accounts. You only mentioned that their TOS is standard.

[1715537430]

1715537430

[1715537430]

1715537430

[1715537430]

1715537430

[1715537430]

1715537430

[LUCKMCFLY]

Hello bitcasinorank,

I have been looking at your site again, but it strikes me that there are other casinos that you place from ranking 1 that I have not seen that type of reviews, and well I respect your criteria, but seeing that several people in the forum have from the ranking 1 high-level casinos with a high reputation, does not match your criteria. The criteria to take into account more or less in what parameters does it do it? since apparently they are criteria that others do not take into account,

 thank you very much in advance.

[Furious 7]

I only saw 5 reviews about casino sites, whereas in this forum there are many popular and big casinos, so why didn't the OP add them again or just search what you reviewed for the parameters?
Like, Roobet, Duelbits, Rollbit and many others?
Sometimes the results of this review are not your own test results but see other people's reviews but on the other hand what about the survey you did? This should be completely fair.

[bitcasinorank]

Hello bitcasinorank,

I have been looking at your site again, but it strikes me that there are other casinos that you place from ranking 1 that I have not seen that type of reviews, and well I respect your criteria, but seeing that several people in the forum have from the ranking 1 high-level casinos with a high reputation, does not match your criteria. The criteria to take into account more or less in what parameters does it do it? since apparently they are criteria that others do not take into account,

 thank you very much in advance.

Thanks for your comment!

yes, different sites have different criteria. I am limited in parameters right now because of limitation of my WordPress theme. But I am going to add more criteria for casino scores in the future when I'll leave my full-time job and will have more time for this project. Right now I use the parameters that most valuable from my point of view

[Mahdirakib]

@bitcasinorank, There was some wrong information in Winz.io payments page. And you had written the min deposit limit based on their payments page. However, I informed them about it and they have updated the page. You should also change that in your review. Min deposit limit for BTC, DOGE & USDT was showing wrong. Actually it is

Thank you for pointing this out. We have updated the Payments page. The correct values for the min deposit are 0.0002 BTC, 1 DOGE, and 0.01 USDT.

[Johnyz]

I only saw 5 reviews about casino sites, whereas in this forum there are many popular and big casinos, so why didn't the OP add them again or just search what you reviewed for the parameters?
Like, Roobet, Duelbits, Rollbit and many others?
Sometimes the results of this review are not your own test results but see other people's reviews but on the other hand what about the survey you did? This should be completely fair.

They are still new and a lot of works to do, but being a review site should be more fair and keen on details about the pros and cons of every site since some newbies are also depending on review sites which is why many are losing money because they depend on the wrong site, maybe this is not a bad one but hopefully they'll improve their critics and reviews, they should be more honest and fair.

[Cling18]

It's a good thing that you have created this kind of site. Through it, those who are looking for legit casino sites would have an idea of what to trust because, to be honest, most beginners these days are just looking for reviews for them to check casinos with a good foundation and background.

[mak013]

Nice work, nice reviews but there are just 5 casinos yet. On this board we see enough rather old casinos with history. They have their members here, they can help to fill the reviews, correct any mistakes.
So idea is good but not enough casinos. As for me - i can`t use it for search casino - only to check information about one, that i found by another way.

[dustboy]

Nice work, nice reviews but there are just 5 casinos yet. On this board we see enough rather old casinos with history. They have their members here, they can help to fill the reviews, correct any mistakes.
So idea is good but not enough casinos. As for me - i can`t use it for search casino - only to check information about one, that i found by another way.

From February till now and there are 5 reviewed casinos only. Maybe it is because the review is made by request only because we can all read in the OP as quoted:

If you are a casino representative you can contact us via skype (live:.cid.3a446b478aadbd95) or email (bitcasinorank@gmail.com)

It is very possible we will not see many casinos here except all the available casinos are requesting the admin of bitcoincasinorank to review them.

[stomachgrowls]

Nice work, nice reviews but there are just 5 casinos yet. On this board we see enough rather old casinos with history. They have their members here, they can help to fill the reviews, correct any mistakes.
So idea is good but not enough casinos. As for me - i can`t use it for search casino - only to check information about one, that i found by another way.

From February till now and there are 5 reviewed casinos only. Maybe it is because the review is made by request only because we can all read in the OP as quoted:

If you are a casino representative you can contact us via skype (live:.cid.3a446b478aadbd95) or email (bitcasinorank@gmail.com)

It is very possible we will not see many casinos here except all the available casinos are requesting the admin of bitcoincasinorank to review them.

Why a certain casino would do that? Unless if this website is really that famous then they might really be getting some sufficient request but if not then it would be just simply be ignored or wouldnt really care at all.

This had been a common scenario on review or ranking sites whether its a casino or other services out there because those words wouldnt really be accurate and those ranking and recommendations
are totally personally preferred and wont be that convincing for people to do the same which its no surprise that they arent really that getting that much of attention.

[bitcasinorank]

@bitcasinorank, There was some wrong information in Winz.io payments page. And you had written the min deposit limit based on their payments page. However, I informed them about it and they have updated the page. You should also change that in your review. Min deposit limit for BTC, DOGE & USDT was showing wrong. Actually it is

Thank you for pointing this out. We have updated the Payments page. The correct values for the min deposit are 0.0002 BTC, 1 DOGE, and 0.01 USDT.

Thank you for pointing at this. I've updated the review

[bitcasinorank]

Nice work, nice reviews but there are just 5 casinos yet. On this board we see enough rather old casinos with history. They have their members here, they can help to fill the reviews, correct any mistakes.
So idea is good but not enough casinos. As for me - i can`t use it for search casino - only to check information about one, that i found by another way.

From February till now and there are 5 reviewed casinos only. Maybe it is because the review is made by request only because we can all read in the OP as quoted:

If you are a casino representative you can contact us via skype (live:.cid.3a446b478aadbd95) or email (bitcasinorank@gmail.com)

It is very possible we will not see many casinos here except all the available casinos are requesting the admin of bitcoincasinorank to review them.

I can confirm, that I don't review requests. The only reason there are just a few reviews is that I run a website on my own. Besides it, I have a full-time job and I also need to write other texts for the website and do some other stuff like SEO.

But I got the opportunity to devote more time to the site, so the reviews will come out more often. On average every week.

[mak013]

Nice work, nice reviews but there are just 5 casinos yet. On this board we see enough rather old casinos with history. They have their members here, they can help to fill the reviews, correct any mistakes.
So idea is good but not enough casinos. As for me - i can`t use it for search casino - only to check information about one, that i found by another way.

From February till now and there are 5 reviewed casinos only. Maybe it is because the review is made by request only because we can all read in the OP as quoted:

If you are a casino representative you can contact us via skype (live:.cid.3a446b478aadbd95) or email (bitcasinorank@gmail.com)

It is very possible we will not see many casinos here except all the available casinos are requesting the admin of bitcoincasinorank to review them.

I can confirm, that I don't review requests. The only reason there are just a few reviews is that I run a website on my own. Besides it, I have a full-time job and I also need to write other texts for the website and do some other stuff like SEO.

But I got the opportunity to devote more time to the site, so the reviews will come out more often. On average every week.

Thank you for your work. But with such quantity of casinos your work can become useless. May be someone can help, for money or for future profit. I don`t know, but in such a way you have a chance to see how someone else steals your idea and catches your work results.

[bitcasinorank]

Hello everyone!
I continue to research the topic of Provably Fair gambling. Today I want to present a short article about Provably Fair Poker.

You can read it here - https://www.bitcasinorank.com/provably-fair-poker/

Please do not hesitate to share your thoughts here or in the comments on the website.

[bitcasinorank]

Check out a fresh review of Fairspin Casino

Feel free to share your feedback here or in the comments on site

[LUCKMCFLY]

I have always been reviewing the top 1 casinos that they place, it has not gone bad, to tell the truth it has given me a lot of curiosity about the casinos that they place, because they have a totally different position than those that are always located here in the forum, however There are some casinos that I see for the first time. Well, there is always a certain diversity in these things, which makes a difference, in some cases it is striking that the first places do not coincide with the criteria of many in the forum. Thank you very much for your very interesting reviews.

[bitcasinorank]

Hello everyone!

As some of you know, the FUN token team has launched a casino called DPLAY at the end of August.

I played in this casino and I hasten to share my experience with you. Feel free to read the DPLAY review.

If you have played at this casino, please share your experience here. It will be interesting to read.

[uneng]

Hello everyone!
I continue to research the topic of Provably Fair gambling. Today I want to present a short article about Provably Fair Poker.

You can read it here - https://www.bitcasinorank.com/provably-fair-poker/

Please do not hesitate to share your thoughts here or in the comments on the website.

That is a nice short article from you. Interesting that you briefed the history of virtual poker since the first game which ran in Atari and could be played by up to 4 players until the first poker site available from 1998 on. And I liked the fact you explained about provably fair poker differentiating poker rooms, where you play against other players, from table rooms, where you play against the house, while showing some examples of provably fair poker sites for those who might be interested in playing the game after reading your article.

Glad we have crypto casinos, because without them provably fair algorithm wouldn't be possible to be applied for real. That ensures gamblers have a more positive experience when betting, brings more legitimacy to the industry and strengths crypto gambling against fiat gambling.

[aioc]

There's a review form under each review but so far I have not seen any reviews coming from visitors, is the reviews moderated and will only be published at your discreation, I'm glad that you are monitoring the trustworthiness of each gambling site on your list example of this is Cloudbet

Cloudbet has 6 unresolved complaints in AskGamblers, 1 in Casino Guru. The rating of the casino on TrustPilot also leaves much to be desired.

This is very important that there is a monitoring of the gambling site on other channels to check its trustworthiness.

[mak013]

As for me - it would be better to made 1 thread for all casinos and mark near casino with what cryptocurrencies it works. So i can look all casino with their rank and this rating will be more important for me then what cryptocurrency i need to pay here.
PS. Nice to see new reviews