⚖️Bitcasinosrank.com - Latest casino test with a real deposit 🔥Bombastic🔥

[FatFork]

Nice review. It becomes more interesting to visit website. If the first visit i didn`t get any useful for me information, now i think that i will visit it sometimes to find some new gambling website or to check some of new i`ve found.
PS. I think you need some more work with design yet. Too much white as for me.

Thanks for your comment, really appreciate.

as for the white design, you can change it to the dark theme by pressing Ctrl + Alt + D

@bitcasinorank, since you use Mercury WordPress Theme for your website, you might consider using either archive template 7 or archive template 8 for casino listings. Personally, I find them more appealing to browse since there is less white in the background and the listed items are more clearly highlighted. Your casino listings will be much more effective this way, in my opinion.

[michellee]

Nice review. It becomes more interesting to visit website. If the first visit i didn`t get any useful for me information, now i think that i will visit it sometimes to find some new gambling website or to check some of new i`ve found.
PS. I think you need some more work with design yet. Too much white as for me.

Thanks for your comment, really appreciate.

as for the white design, you can change it to the dark theme by pressing Ctrl + Alt + D

@bitcasinorank, since you use Mercury WordPress Theme for your website, you might consider using either archive template 7 or archive template 8 for casino listings. Personally, I find them more appealing to browse since there is less white in the background and the listed items are more clearly highlighted. Your casino listings will be much more effective this way, in my opinion.

Templates 7 and 8 are almost the same but the difference is not too much so choosing one will not be a problem. But after I see on his website, I think his template is okay and maybe he can still use the template if he does not want to change to the other template. Maybe he should focus on promoting his site to the public using social media to get more visitors. Besides that, he can add more websites to his review so his visitors can read a new listing on the site and select the site they will use to play gambling.

[bitcasinorank]

Wild Tornado Casino

Available Crypto: BTC, ETH, DOGE, BCH, LTC, USDT, XRP


Pros

• + Great reputation and user reviews
• + Exclusive SoftSwiss (Dama N.V.) casino with Ripple

Cons

• - High min withdrawal
• - Low max withdrawal limits

Learn more about this casino in the detailed Wild Tornado Review

[AmoreJaz]

i have seen a lot of your commentators here are promoting duelbits, stake, betcoin.ag, but you haven't done your review yet on these sites. when are you going to take a look at these sites? considering that this thread started last feb, so you basically had 8 months to check and review at least the reputable and popular casinos in the forum

[dustboy]

I'm curious to know what kind of conflict between bitcasinorank and Fortunejack? Is it a conflict like between player and the casino or a conflict between affiliate and the casino? As I know there is always a special offer from any casino to anyone who have review site like this, the offer can be something like bigger affiliate commission or something else. I'm guessing the conflict is in this area.

It's a mixed conflict. I had an affiliate account and created a player account to test the casino. They provided a no deposit bonus and I won around $400. I've requested a withdrawal but they rejected it and said that you can't have a player account if you have an affiliate account. They have this rule in their affiliate terms but I think this rule is unfair.

How can it be unfair if it is mentioned on their terms? I know it is something unusual because most other casinos lets players to have both gambling account and affiliate account. Fortunejack has different rule and you should accept it once you create an account no matter affiliate account or gambling account unless the rule is added after you created your account.

[bitcasinorank]

I'm curious to know what kind of conflict between bitcasinorank and Fortunejack? Is it a conflict like between player and the casino or a conflict between affiliate and the casino? As I know there is always a special offer from any casino to anyone who have review site like this, the offer can be something like bigger affiliate commission or something else. I'm guessing the conflict is in this area.

It's a mixed conflict. I had an affiliate account and created a player account to test the casino. They provided a no deposit bonus and I won around $400. I've requested a withdrawal but they rejected it and said that you can't have a player account if you have an affiliate account. They have this rule in their affiliate terms but I think this rule is unfair.

How can it be unfair if it is mentioned on their terms? I know it is something unusual because most other casinos lets players to have both gambling account and affiliate account. Fortunejack has different rule and you should accept it once you create an account no matter affiliate account or gambling account unless the rule is added after you created your account.

I didn't say that the situation is unfair. I accept it. Many casinos and affiliate programs have controversial rules and you should accept them if you want to play or work there.
I just said that this rule seems unfair to me personally. So I don't want to work with them because of this at the current moment.

[bitcasinorank]

I've written the review of TrustDice Casino in March. A lot of time has passed since then and a lot has changed in the casino.

Check out the updated TrustDice review.

[bitcasinorank]

I tried to buy some TXT but failed. Why it happened so read in my article.

TrustDice TXT Guide

[bitcasinorank]

Bitcasino.

Available Crypto: BTC, ETH, USDT, DOGE, XRP, ADA, TRX, LTC


Pros

• + Lots of slots and live casino games
• + No Wager Welcome Bonus
• + Unique game statistics
• + Luck of unresolved complaints

Cons

• - Lack of Provably Fair games
• - Weekly withdrawal limits

Learn more about this casino in the detailed Bitcasino Review

[crzy]

Bitcasino.

Available Crypto: BTC, ETH, USDT, DOGE, XRP, ADA, TRX, LTC


Pros

• + Lots of slots and live casino games
• + No Wager Welcome Bonus
• + Unique game statistics
• + Luck of unresolved complaints

Cons

• - Lack of Provably Fair games
• - Weekly withdrawal limits

Learn more about this casino in the detailed Bitcasino Review

Good to see the pros and cons of this site, the detailed reviews are well written and you can really see most of the details there, its finally good to see a fair review site. Anyway, looking for other site here especially the new one and maybe you can share your real experience with then.

[stomachgrowls]

Bitcasino.
~

Awesome work, enjoying to read the comparisons about the gambling platforms. Any ideas to add the sports bookies in the near future?

Adding up sports book just like on other top tier gambling sites in the market is doing? Yes it can be done but still would be on their decision.

Adding sports wont really guaranteed out success but at least having this would add up on their option for its gamblers whether to play casino games or sports betting.

For now leave as it is because sooner or later whether they do consider on adding up or not or would simply stay on what they are now.

[DoublerHunter]

~snip~

Good to see the pros and cons of this site, the detailed reviews are well written and you can really see most of the details there, its finally good to see a fair review site. Anyway, looking for other site here especially the new one and maybe you can share your real experience with then.

^ Though it was a good review it's good if the review comes from the community which is we heard different reviews on the different gambling casino sites. That is right, we have here different casinos, and there is a lot of new casino on this thread, probably you can find them and have your own review so that they will know about them. To be honest, reviewing gambling casino sites as of now was very common here, probably you can promote here your review site to boost your PR in the community.

[bitcasinorank]

Good to see the pros and cons of this site, the detailed reviews are well written and you can really see most of the details there, its finally good to see a fair review site. Anyway, looking for other site here especially the new one and maybe you can share your real experience with then.

~snip~

Good to see the pros and cons of this site, the detailed reviews are well written and you can really see most of the details there, its finally good to see a fair review site. Anyway, looking for other site here especially the new one and maybe you can share your real experience with then.

^ Though it was a good review it's good if the review comes from the community which is we heard different reviews on the different gambling casino sites. That is right, we have here different casinos, and there is a lot of new casino on this thread, probably you can find them and have your own review so that they will know about them. To be honest, reviewing gambling casino sites as of now was very common here, probably you can promote here your review site to boost your PR in the community.

Thank you guys for your feedback. Your kind words really motivate me to keep going! Now I try to keep pace and release 1 review per week, so more reviews are on the way.

[bitcasinorank]

Haz Casino

Available Crypto: BTC, ETH, LTC, BNB, XMR, XRP, TRX


Pros

• + Great games selection
• + No wager bonuses and promotions
• + Supports Binance Coin as a payment method
• + Full localization to Arabic and German
• + Low min deposits

Cons

• - Bonus amounts are pegged to euros
• - Max cashout from the bonus is capped at x5 bonus sum
• - Weekly withdrawal limits
• - Lack of provably fair games
• - Transaction fees for some withdrawal methods
• - Long registration process

More details in the full Haz Casino Review

[mak013]

Your site becomes more interesting due to the increasing quantity of casinos. Nice to see that there are reviews at more than 10 casinos.
Just one more question: why there are different styles between the Ethereum casinos and all the others? And only 1 content section. As for me - it would be better to make all sections the same.

[Mahdirakib]

~snip~

I'm wondering how you are choosing a casino to make the review of them. Haz Casino isn't a popular casino. Their ANN thread is inactive here since last four months. I was surprised with the Registration Process part of this casino in your review. There are 6 stages and it looks like a user need to provide most of his personal information during registration. This is a big cons of this casino. You have mentioned about few other cons in your review. Still they got 4 rating out of 5!

[famososMuertos]

I liked this article https://www.bitcasinorank.com/provably-fair-poker/ I think you left the typical line of post in reference to what you call "reviews" with your main objective being the post in reference to casinos.

You plan to have more spontaneous posts, like the one mentioned, I know that the objective of the site is to give information about the casinos, but less standardized opinions or templates always start to create a regular query rule, in that sense I would like to ask you; how do you see the future of 100% poker-crypto casinos, it is not that I do not have an idea, but I am doing this query with several of the users who like you have this type of website.

Finally and in fair play my following comment:
I have put reviews between "" because I believe and not only happens with you, by the way I already mentioned it, but I think that the true reviews must have the experience of who does it in the game, that is very valuable and perhaps make niche of faithful consultation among your readers, so for example this:

For each level achieved, you will receive a reward, for every 8 levels a chest, with a more generous reward. The casino does not indicate the size of the awards. But my colleague from the GamblingBro website reached level 5 and received such awards:

^{source: bitcasinorank.com/casino/bc-game-review/}

The effort to get the information is appreciated, without a doubt, but you understand the point that it really is a "review" I think that as in this case you should mention in which casino you are a frequent player and in which not, it is a term that they have misrepresented, the essence is that its use is wrong and in fact it is at the discretion it, but if you want to start taking real players and you take so long to get a new "reviews" one would aspire to read:

"It took me three months to reach VIP level 4, starting with a bankroll of $ 100, playing about 5 hours a day betting in limbo, at a 30% winchance and a bet of $ 0.01," this is an example.

Anyway, as I mentioned this is appreciation that only looks for a positive feedback.
Please don't forget my question, ty.

@bitcasinorank
Edit: Add,
OKAY! thanks for skipping, my comment and the consequent question, sure very difficult !! (?) I do not think so.

[bitcasinorank]

Your site becomes more interesting due to the increasing quantity of casinos. Nice to see that there are reviews at more than 10 casinos.
Just one more question: why there are different styles between the Ethereum casinos and all the others? And only 1 content section. As for me - it would be better to make all sections the same.

Thanks for your comment!

Regarding the different styles. All sections except Ethereum are templates from a WordPress theme and they have limitations in editing. Ethereum Casinos is a custom section and I am going to remake other sections as well.
But it has its cons. So I'll be thankful if you could tell me which section you like more:)

~snip~

I'm wondering how you are choosing a casino to make the review of them. Haz Casino isn't a popular casino. Their ANN thread is inactive here since last four months. I was surprised with the Registration Process part of this casino in your review. There are 6 stages and it looks like a user need to provide most of his personal information during registration. This is a big cons of this casino. You have mentioned about few other cons in your review. Still they got 4 rating out of 5!

Thanks for your comment. I decided to make a review of the not very popular casino because everyone in this thread told me that I have only well-known brands:)
As for Haz Casino rating. Due to WordPress theme limitations, I can include just 4 factors in ranking, and the Registration process is not one of them. But I always indicate such things in review and in cons. I've included the registration process to the cons, thanks for pointing at it.

[mak013]

Your site becomes more interesting due to the increasing quantity of casinos. Nice to see that there are reviews at more than 10 casinos.
Just one more question: why there are different styles between the Ethereum casinos and all the others? And only 1 content section. As for me - it would be better to make all sections the same.

Thanks for your comment!

Regarding the different styles. All sections except Ethereum are templates from a WordPress theme and they have limitations in editing. Ethereum Casinos is a custom section and I am going to remake other sections as well.
But it has its cons. So I'll be thankful if you could tell me which section you like more:)

Ethereum is more interesting as for me. It looks more compact and informative. + Contest section is an interesting decision with some useful information for newbies. I think it can be a good idea to make the same sections for another cryptocurrencies. And some advices how to decrease transaction commissions may be.

[bitcasinorank]

I liked this article https://www.bitcasinorank.com/provably-fair-poker/ I think you left the typical line of post in reference to what you call "reviews" with your main objective being the post in reference to casinos.

You plan to have more spontaneous posts, like the one mentioned, I know that the objective of the site is to give information about the casinos, but less standardized opinions or templates always start to create a regular query rule, in that sense I would like to ask you; how do you see the future of 100% poker-crypto casinos, it is not that I do not have an idea, but I am doing this query with several of the users who like you have this type of website.

Finally and in fair play my following comment:
I have put reviews between "" because I believe and not only happens with you, by the way I already mentioned it, but I think that the true reviews must have the experience of who does it in the game, that is very valuable and perhaps make niche of faithful consultation among your readers, so for example this:

For each level achieved, you will receive a reward, for every 8 levels a chest, with a more generous reward. The casino does not indicate the size of the awards. But my colleague from the GamblingBro website reached level 5 and received such awards:

^{source: bitcasinorank.com/casino/bc-game-review/}

The effort to get the information is appreciated, without a doubt, but you understand the point that it really is a "review" I think that as in this case you should mention in which casino you are a frequent player and in which not, it is a term that they have misrepresented, the essence is that its use is wrong and in fact it is at the discretion it, but if you want to start taking real players and you take so long to get a new "reviews" one would aspire to read:

"It took me three months to reach VIP level 4, starting with a bankroll of $ 100, playing about 5 hours a day betting in limbo, at a 30% winchance and a bet of $ 0.01," this is an example.

Anyway, as I mentioned this is appreciation that only looks for a positive feedback.
Please don't forget my question, ty.

@bitcasinorank
Edit: Add,
OKAY! thanks for skipping, my comment and the consequent question, sure very difficult !! (?) I do not think so.

I am so sorry, for some reason I didn't see your comment.

First of all, I appreciate that you liked my article about Provably Fair Poker. I will definitely write more such posts.

Answering your questions
Your question seems to me not entirely correct. 100% of sites cannot have one future. And it's quite difficult for me to imagine what it will be like. It seems to me that technologies will be introduced that we do not even know about now and the game will move to a completely different level (for example, in Metaverse). Players will no longer sit in front of their screens, but will completely immerse themselves in the game. This is if it speaks of the distant future. If we talk about the near future, then I would like to see the further implementation of the Provably Fair algorithm.

As for mentioning personal experience, I try to do it if I have such experience. Also, comments are open on the casino reviews page, and I will publish reviews of other players when they leave them there.