Bitcoin Forum
May 08, 2024, 01:33:56 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: ETH Vulnerable? Schnorr, claims .. (new exploit) “destroys the RSA cryptosystem”  (Read 66 times)
eddie13 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2296
Merit: 2262


BTC or BUST


View Profile
March 05, 2021, 11:29:10 PM
 #1

“ A recent paper, “Fast Factoring Integers by SVP Algorithms” by Claus P. Schnorr, claims significant improvements in factoring that “destroys the RSA cryptosystem”.”
https://sweis.medium.com/did-schnorr-destroy-rsa-show-me-the-factors-dcb1bb980ab0

“ Claus Peter Schnorr recently posted a 12-page factoring method by SVP algorithms. Is it correct?”
https://crypto.stackexchange.com/questions/88582/does-schnorrs-2021-factoring-method-show-that-the-rsa-cryptosystem-is-not-secur


From what I am seeing this could be big if true/correct.. I’m not seeing any mention of it here yet..
I assume this is the same “Schnorr” as in “Schnorr signatures”? Edit: Yes it is..


Does this mean anything to Bitcoin or other coins that use different algorithms?
A laymen’s explanation could also be very helpful to many here (including me)..




“ cryptocurrencies have shunned RSA in favor of  signatures based on elliptic curves, initially ECDSA and later moving towards pairing-based cryptography. Ethereum is the lone exception, having added native RSA support with EIP-198. “
https://www.google.com/amp/s/randomoracle.wordpress.com/2019/07/14/ethereum-mixing-with-rsa-getting-by-without-zero-knowledge-proofs/amp/

So maybe it will kill ETH..


If this is true, that RSA encryption is basically cracked, how bad would it hurt ETH?

Chancellor on Brink of Second Bailout for Banks
1715175236
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715175236

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715175236
Reply with quote  #2

1715175236
Report to moderator
1715175236
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715175236

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715175236
Reply with quote  #2

1715175236
Report to moderator
1715175236
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715175236

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715175236
Reply with quote  #2

1715175236
Report to moderator
The forum was founded in 2009 by Satoshi and Sirius. It replaced a SourceForge forum.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715175236
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715175236

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715175236
Reply with quote  #2

1715175236
Report to moderator
1715175236
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715175236

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715175236
Reply with quote  #2

1715175236
Report to moderator
1715175236
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715175236

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715175236
Reply with quote  #2

1715175236
Report to moderator
eddie13 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2296
Merit: 2262


BTC or BUST


View Profile
March 07, 2021, 04:10:52 PM
 #2

Bump

How is it possible their is no interest in this on this forum?

Chancellor on Brink of Second Bailout for Banks
Nighthog
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 133
Merit: 5


View Profile
March 07, 2021, 04:27:10 PM
 #3

I think people just don't know much or what it means.

A blank slate of knowledge on the matter.

Even I have no idea what it means at the moment, first time hearing about "RSA". But if it involves cryptography and is part of the ETH security it should be looked into by the relevant parties, meaning ETH development team in general rather than anyone else. That is if they know themselves what it means.

It might just sound worse than in practice having any effect.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!