#SuperStraight

[eddie13]

A new gender identity has been invented called “SuperStraight” putting an S into the LGBTQ alphabet..
It basically means that you are only attracted to a natural born member of the opposite sex..
“Straights” have long been criticized and labeled “transphobic” for not wanting to date transsexuals.
Well, it turns out that “superstraight” is just another sexual identity..
Turns out their are also many many “SuperLesbians” and “SuperGays” coming out now aswell now that the discovery of this new sexual identity has been made..
They already have a flag and a symbol..

The problem is that many of the LGBTQ community are mad about it, but who are they to question the sexual identity of anyone else?

What do YOU think?




“ A Community for Oppressed Men & Women that consider their Sexuality/Gender/Religion to be “Super Straight” Super Straight: A Sexuality meant to describe Male or Female that is only Attracted to the opposite biological Sex/Gender. #SuperStraight 🛎Not transphobic or homophobic🛎 ”
https://www.reddit.com/r/SuperStraight/

[1715216357]

1715216357

[1715216357]

1715216357

[1715216357]

1715216357

[1715216357]

1715216357

[1715216357]

1715216357

[1715216357]

1715216357

[suchmoon]

So how does it work, do you ask for a birth certificate before engaging into any kind of coupling?

[squatz1]

So how does it work, do you ask for a birth certificate before engaging into any kind of coupling?

Precisely. You actually make them sign a legally binding agreement before any sort of sexual contact. Template has actually been attached to this post for your convenience.

Not sure why anyone spends any time getting all worked up about new identities and such. I’ll do me over here and you can do you over there.

[franky1]

“Straights” have long been criticized and labeled “transphobic” for not wanting to date transsexuals.

The problem is that many of the LGBTQ community are mad about it, but who are they to question the sexual

fixed that for you

if 'they'(pronoun) think that straight men should date trans.. then 'they' need to remove LG because 'they' dont want people to have gender preference

'they' are basically throwing out 40% of their community acronym for not being fluid enough

[game-protect-sucks]

Where does #superstraight put people like this:

https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51xfe8dEJoL._AC_UX569_.jpg

[Gyfts]

Where does #superstraight put people like this:

#SometimesStraight

[eddie13]

“Straights” have long been criticized and labeled “transphobic” for not wanting to date transsexuals.

The problem is that many of the LGBTQ community are mad about it, but who are they to question the sexual

fixed that for you

if 'they'(pronoun) think that straight men should date trans.. then 'they' need to remove LG because 'they' dont want people to have gender preference

'they' are basically throwing out 40% of their community acronym for not being fluid enough

“SuperStraight/SuperLesbian” is a reductio ad absurdum logic response that basically flips the entire field of gender studies on its head..

They made up all this nonsense and now are BTFO by their own game..

[franky1]

“Straights” have long been criticized and labeled “transphobic” for not wanting to date transsexuals.

The problem is that many of the LGBTQ community are mad about it, but who are they to question the sexual

fixed that for you

if 'they'(pronoun) think that straight men should date trans.. then 'they' need to remove LG because 'they' dont want people to have gender preference

'they' are basically throwing out 40% of their community acronym for not being fluid enough

“SuperStraight/SuperLesbian” is a reductio ad absurdum logic response that basically flips the entire field of gender studies on its head..

They made up all this nonsense and now are BTFO by their own game..

its all just teeny trend making. ..
new fashion craze of trying to be the next "original thought" person of the next acronym letter.
a decade ago they wanted to organise people by harry potter groups

if anyone tries the new trends on me. i just tell them i go by the pronouns
'helicopter, chopper, swirly whirly bird' and leave them to try to remember to use them correctly and without argument. they get the hint that using their requested pronouns is just as much unsociable and used just to wait for other person to get it wrong to argue and scowl at them for not being woke
they learn quick

i got nothing against people having their own preferences and not wanting to just be labelled as certain things.
but trying to pigeon hole people into categories and labels and then arguing with everyone about not psychicly recognising their preference on first introduction. well thats just 'drama for trends' and completely hypocritical

i dont go around telling everyone im straight. its not a subject that needs to be discussed with everyone.
its not how normal people introduce themselves in everyday conversation
the younger generation seem to be stuck in the internet chatroom 'speak' where the first intro is usually age/gender/location. and they cant understand how real life social interactions work

you know. you say a joke. they dont even smile. no giggle. but they say LOL
all these silly things are linked.

true people wanting to be free to express themselves and have different preferences to the archiac norms. should just stop wasting time with trending labels..  and just live their lives

[acroman08]

sounds like a move to bring out the LGBTQ community's inner hypocrisy and it is definitely working. not that they aren't already. the community has become so toxic that they would criticize people that only have a certain preference on who they want to date or have sex with.

[Natsuu]

So in definition, "superstraight" is someone who will die just not to have sex with same birth sex, while straight is someone who loves opposite sex but has the possibility to have sex with same birth sex for some definite reasons, like money.

But isn't it just another confusion for the mass, like what if he is "Super straight" and mistakenly had sex with a transwoman, then just knows afterwards that and became homophobic after. Isn't he become only "Straight" as he is now known to be transphobic/homophobic because of the incident?

[Foxpup]

So how does it work, do you ask for a birth certificate before engaging into any kind of coupling?

No good; those are based on nothing more than a cursory inspection of a baby's genitalia, and we already have a word for people whose sexual attraction is based on looking at baby genitals. No, biological sex is all about the number and size of your gametes. It's an unusual bodily characteristic to be attracted to, if only because gametes can't be observed with the naked eye, but if semen analysis and ovarian function tests are what gets your motor going, then who am I to judge?



(Yes, this also means that everyone who's sterile for any reason whatsoever is biologically sexless or "neuter", which is one of the reasons why we don't normally use biological sex to categorise humans, but how else is OP supposed to weed out the unattractive people?)

[franky1]

So in definition, "superstraight"

the trend of #superstraight is to cause conflict of saying
straight: admitting your bi or questioning (BQ)
superstraight: admitting your homophobe and want LGBTQ to die(facepalm)

yep its the 'straight is the new bi' nonsense. or the non-LGBTQ are murderers

its done to make it into an argument that straight people have to admit they are bi or sexist.

in my view straight is straight.. bi is bi.  there is a difference. straight is not bi
those people questioning if they are straight already have a acronym letter.. Q(questioning)

yet the LGBTQ community hope that they can be fluid and pretend they are above all the drama and conflict, while they are the ones creating the conflict. hense the term political.. in political correctness.
(politicians stand above the conflict while causing the conflict)

.. basically trying to make LGBTQ people seem superior by pointing fingers at non LGBTQ people and calling them out as flawed people that need to be managed.

in my view its the BTQ community that are flawed by trying to do these things as they are attacking the LG people more so than straight people.

much like trump attacking his own republican reps that didnt jump on the trump waggon. hurting his own community more

[o_e_l_e_o]

It's an unusual bodily characteristic to be attracted to, if only because gametes can't be observed with the naked eye, but if semen analysis and ovarian function tests are what gets your motor going, then who am I to judge?

Slight correction: A human egg cell can measure up to 120 microns in diameter (0.12 mm), which is indeed visible with the naked eye! I know this because I always request that prospective sexual partners menstruate in to a suitable container which I can rummage around in to identify the ovum prior to copulation. Although once I mistook a speck of dust for the aforementioned gamete, so I don't think I can call myself SuperStraight anymore. Or maybe because of all the orgies. Who knows?

[eddie13]

Lot of ridiculous spin trying to convince anyone that trans women are real women..

Exactly why all these people are calling themselves “SuperStraight”, so they have an argument against being a “transphobe”, and can possibly escape cancel culture..
It’s only playing their own game...

Myself, I lean more towards just being “straight” and holding the opinion that trans women are not real women..
If I get called a “homophobe” I’ll just admit that they creep me out..

I find the logic of the super movement quite interesting..


Another thing I find very interesting is that I can make posts here about Schnorr’s recent paper claiming to have broken all RSA encryption, and get zero analytical replies about it, yet, I can make a post on this forum about gender nonsense, and I get analysis down to what specs are in period blood.. (as if mtf trans actually have periods)

[franky1]

Another thing I find very interesting is that I can make posts here about Schnorr’s recent paper claiming to have broken all RSA encryption, and get zero analytical replies about it, yet, I can make a post on this forum about gender nonsense, and I get analysis down to what specs are in period blood.. (as if mtf trans actually have periods)

because everyone has a gender.. but no one has ethereum

[suchmoon]

Exactly why all these people are calling themselves “SuperStraight”, so they have an argument against being a “transphobe”, and can possibly escape cancel culture..

"These people" didn't think this through, did they?

Another thing I find very interesting is that I can make posts here about Schnorr’s recent paper claiming to have broken all RSA encryption, and get zero analytical replies about it

You posted it on the shitcoining board... no one reads that, not even shitcoiners themselves.

And he didn't break anything, not yet anyway. There are still unclaimed ~800-bit challenges and IIRC current recommended key size is 2048 or 4096 or something in that range.

[PrimeNumber7]

So how does it work, do you ask for a birth certificate before engaging into any kind of coupling?

This will be insufficient in about 20 years. Several states allow for birth certificates to be gender-neutral.

I don't think it is unreasonable for someone to have a preference as to if their partner has ever changed genders.

[franky1]

So how does it work, do you ask for a birth certificate before engaging into any kind of coupling?

This will be insufficient in about 20 years. Several states allow for birth certificates to be gender-neutral.

I don't think it is unreasonable for someone to have a preference as to if their partner has ever changed genders.

the issue i see is that some people question their gender and spend years stressed not knowing their identity.. and now all a sudden instead of just saying. 'no one cares.. just get on with your life and be happy' EVERYONE that was sure of their gender is suppose to question their gender suddenly.

seems like a certain community want to feel normal by making everyone else confused. so that confusion is the new normal..
sorry but thats just stupid.
how about realise no one actually cares about someone elses sexual preference. in the real world people dont walk up to a cashier and say 'who did you have sex with last night'
normal real world conversations with random people dont work like that. no one cares who they sleep with outside the workplace. or at the grocery store.
its not part of normal real world introduction conversations

when i talk to people i can tell the difference between 2 people by their height and haircolour. i dont need to investigate or ask about their sexual preference just to identify them

sorry but if parents want to put their kid into a headspin for the rest of their life by saying 'you have no gender' and start dressing (what doctors know to be a boy) in pink dresses.. is then the parents abusing their kid

forcing a kid to question their gender.. is abuse

[PrimeNumber7]

forcing a kid to question their gender.. is abuse

I would have to agree with you on this one.

Having a gender-neutral birth certificate is really just stupid, and there is plenty of time for parents to decide to accept their child's gender for what it is. Teaching young children that they "want" to be another gender is where the abuse is.

[mindrust]

What do YOU think?

I think we are now experiencing the peak of the socialist/liberal insanity and they won't stop till they fuck us all in the ass.