#SuperStraight

[Mauser]

try that in the workplace
boss: "good morning ladies and gentlemen"
jeff: "boss dont call me a gentleman. im an aggressive trans using pronouns 'them'"
boss: "well dont call me boss either. call me 'the person that pays your wage if you get on with your work'"
jeff: "dont tell me what to do.. im not a slave"
boss: "well 'them' is not listed on my payroll, so your right. so as a free person you can go home and find another job"

Yeah imagine that, how to turn your coworkers and boss against you in 3 seconds. I mean he couldn't really fire you for it, because you are protected by law. But still I wouldn't want to see how the performance talks are going to look like and you will probably not getting any bonus for that year. This is just creating such a huge mess.

And now it seems that super straight is already banned from TikTok. Probably only a matter of weeks until Twitter and Facebook will do the same.

[Cnut237]

I wonder if there's a correlation between people who identify as 'super straight', and people whose response to BLM is 'all lives matter'.
I would assume there's pretty much a 100% match. Probably a bit difficult to acquire data on this, but perhaps if someone is willing to go to Washington and stand outside the Capitol with a clipboard, ready to question 'passers by' the next time it's stormed, we might get some interesting information.

It does seem a bit of a 'What about me? I'm not a minority but I'm important too! Stop focusing on oppressed people/groups!' kind of thing.

[hornetsnest]

If women are deemed equal to men then the real argument regarding quotas to be filled should start at the bottom.There should be equal representation of bodies on the front line in any future conflicts.Similiar quotas should be met down coal mines etc.Women should no longer get special treatment when the ship is sinking as it is now discriminatory to men to have women and children be placed in the life boats first (you see where this is going).

There should no longer be any female prisons and all genders should be accommodated in the same manner as it is discriminatory and apartheid to have separate facilities.There should no longer be male or female only sports,dressing/changing rooms,lavatories/toilets etc as this is aparteid and discriminatory.


....you see,as you reap you should expect to sow.Hypocrisy and not vanity is the greatest sin as partial and selective truths are but a lie.I cannot lie

~infinite wisdom V humanity's infantile brains  

[mindrust]

...

There should no longer be any female prisons and all genders should be accommodated in the same manner as it is discriminatory ...

They want to be equals when it benefits them and not when it doesn't. Classic SJW hypocrisy.

[hornetsnest]

...

There should no longer be any female prisons and all genders should be accommodated in the same manner as it is discriminatory ...

They want to be equals when it benefits them and not when it doesn't. Classic SJW hypocrisy.

That is true for those who support this extremist movement that has polluted public discourse.If they want the full brunt of what it truly means to be equal they must face the same survival of the fittest brutal nature of what it means to survive in the most hostile places.Weak men who are disadvantaged by a lack of physical strength or other characteristics are being discriminated against when they have to face other stronger men on the battlefield,prison yard,boxing ring,rugby pitch etc so if the sluice gates are to be opened then they should will be opened fully and these extremists will reap what they sow but unfortunately they will bring forth the misery they release upon the heads of all decent women also.

It is only because of the merciful nature of men towards the weaker sex that this does not happen but if the extremists brainwash all women eventually then mercy will no longer show its face and women will reap what they sow.This is the unfortunate scenario men and women are faced with as the provocateurs are left go unchecked and unchallenged.

[Natsuu]

I wonder if there's a correlation between people who identify as 'super straight', and people whose response to BLM is 'all lives matter'.
I would assume there's pretty much a 100% match. Probably a bit difficult to acquire data on this, but perhaps if someone is willing to go to Washington and stand outside the Capitol with a clipboard, ready to question 'passers by' the next time it's stormed, we might get some interesting information.

It does seem a bit of a 'What about me? I'm not a minority but I'm important too! Stop focusing on oppressed people/groups!' kind of thing.

I don't think those people are even ready to understand just a bit of what "super straight" means and trash it immediately. I don't think you can even start a conversation regarding this topic with them.

Though I would like to see if there is a significant relationship with those two variables. I wonder.

[o_e_l_e_o]

I would assume there's pretty much a 100% match.

I would also wager that anyone who would label themselves "super straight" in real life will never find themselves in a situation where a trans person might want to sleep with them.

[Foxpup]

I would also wager that anyone who would label themselves "super straight" in real life will never find themselves in a situation where a trans person might want to sleep with them.

You're on. I give it six months, a year at the most, before a moderately-sized scandal erupts involving a semi-famous "super straight" person being caught having a secret sexual relationship with a trans person (assuming this "super straight" fad even lasts that long). It's as inevitable as ardent homophobes turning out to be secretly gay. (Never underestimate the ability of hateful bigots to somehow manage to score dates with people they openly claim to hate.)

[eddie13]

Probably all incels right?

[Tzupy]

Super Straight: The New "Transphobic" Sexuality
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ENADjeOXYcA

[o_e_l_e_o]

I would also wager that anyone who would label themselves "super straight" in real life will never find themselves in a situation where a trans person might want to sleep with them.

You're on. I give it six months, a year at the most, before a moderately-sized scandal erupts involving a semi-famous "super straight" person being caught having a secret sexual relationship with a trans person (assuming this "super straight" fad even lasts that long).

Deal. I'll bet the schematics for the secret microchip that we've actually been smuggling in to all the COVID vaccines. I expect an equally juicy stake from you.

How about a bet on how long it will take someone to declare themselves "super white"?

[ammodotcom]

This is going to fly like a lead balloon.

[Foxpup]

Deal. I'll bet the schematics for the secret microchip that we've actually been smuggling in to all the COVID vaccines. I expect an equally juicy stake from you.

I'll bet one of the unclaimed mystery boxes I still have lying around from the Vulpine Order of Merit. This one contains a live bobcat (as mystery boxes sometimes do), as well as an experimental apparatus containing a caesium-137 radiation source and an untested Monsanto product. This a new experimental design intended to remove sampling bias from controlled trials, developed by Monsanto and later abandoned when they realised that scientific studies don't hold up in court, which is how I got this box so cheap. I'm sure it'll go nice with the other Monsanto box I gave you. As always, open with care.

How about a bet on how long it will take someone to declare themselves "super white"?

No bet. It's probably already happening on one of the chans.

EDIT: Typo

[o_e_l_e_o]

Shhh! We don't want people to figure out that you sent me some deadly mist, and shortly afterwards a deadly virus spread by aerosols (i.e. mist) encompassed the entire globe. Otherwise they'll figure out that we are in cahoots to put the 5Gates microchip in the entire world!

And now you want to send me a radioactive bobcat? Hope everyone has got their tinfoil hats bodysuits ready.


Somewhat back on topic, but I've never understood why there are people just sitting at home getting angry thinking about other people's genitals or sexual preference. Do you have nothing better to do with your time?

[Natsuu]

Somewhat back on topic, but I've never understood why there are people just sitting at home getting angry thinking about other people's genitals or sexual preference. Do you have nothing better to do with your time?

They maybe thinking about the possible outcomes in future events. What this may cause and how will it affect them. As they think about it, they started to have somehow concern related to the topic thus start the conversation.

And I don't think that this male gender they referred as the "SuperStraight" to be the one to recommend and add it to the LGBTQ. As a matter of fact, based on the description, it is like a tease to those straight men to be called superstraight.

[Cnut237]

I've never understood why there are people just sitting at home getting angry thinking about other people's genitals or sexual preference.

I think the root of this is fear of the Other. Homophobia, racism, any sort of bigotry, have the same underlying basis.

Human society is often Us vs Them. 'Them' is a threat, and has been back to the time of paleolithic hunter-gatherer tribes, and I'd imagine early than that, back through our hominin ancestry. And of course it has served rulers throughout history, from tribal chiefs and kings and warlords right through to modern governments, to deflect attention/blame from their own shortcomings onto the convenient scapegoat of the outsider who doesn't have a voice to defend themselves. 'They' are always to blame. Brexit. Mexicans. Black people. Gay people. etc. etc.

And any exposure to this Other serves to peel away a part of the illusion. Which is why the most racist communities are those in 100% white rural areas, why the most ardent homophobes are those who have never met an openly gay person, etc.

[Mauser]

Somewhat back on topic, but I've never understood why there are people just sitting at home getting angry thinking about other people's genitals or sexual preference. Do you have nothing better to do with your time?

They maybe thinking about the possible outcomes in future events. What this may cause and how will it affect them. As they think about it, they started to have somehow concern related to the topic thus start the conversation.

And I don't think that this male gender they referred as the "SuperStraight" to be the one to recommend and add it to the LGBTQ. As a matter of fact, based on the description, it is like a tease to those straight men to be called superstraight.

Isn't it the culutre these days to be offended? I think for many people the internet is just here to have arguments with complete strangers. So many people are getting triggered these days online and invest a lot of time just to try and convince others of their opinion. The problem is that we will never listen to complete strangers online. Honestly, we should be bigger than that and just try to be positive. There is no reason to fight over sexualities. Everbody has the right to be happy and identify as what he wants, so calling someone out as transphobic is not right.

[Natsuu]

Somewhat back on topic, but I've never understood why there are people just sitting at home getting angry thinking about other people's genitals or sexual preference. Do you have nothing better to do with your time?

They maybe thinking about the possible outcomes in future events. What this may cause and how will it affect them. As they think about it, they started to have somehow concern related to the topic thus start the conversation.

And I don't think that this male gender they referred as the "SuperStraight" to be the one to recommend and add it to the LGBTQ. As a matter of fact, based on the description, it is like a tease to those straight men to be called superstraight.

----- There is no reason to fight over sexualities. Everbody has the right to be happy and identify as what he wants, so calling someone out as transphobic is not right.

And that's what I've been saying. Thank you. Super straight is a straight to the point insult for those people with preference not liking same gender and thinking already that they're transphobic or something.

And referring to this generations line of thinking with regards to being offended. Yes they're really sensitive and want social validation for anything they does. But not all of this generations people are like that, most of them comes from social media people who had been growing with that kind of environment.

[hornetsnest]

The perpetually offended are simply mirroring the hidden offence that they carry within themselves.

[paxmao]

How many of those gender classifying shit heads voted for Trump exactly? I'll give you a number: Zero.

They are all coming from the left.

Trump opened lots of people's eyes. Even the non-Americans. Socialism, Liberalism, Communism these are the diseases people should get rid of forever or else they won't stop till they turn everybody into a LGBT...

Are you aware that that eye-opening supernew and supercool narrative was the Middle Age narrative in a twitter feed? Nobody is telling you how to live your life, so just stop telling others how to live theirs.

...

There should no longer be any female prisons and all genders should be accommodated in the same manner as it is discriminatory ...

They want to be equals when it benefits them and not when it doesn't. Classic SJW hypocrisy.

...

It is only because of the merciful nature of men towards the weaker sex that this does not happen but if the extremists brainwash all women eventually then mercy will no longer show its face and women will reap what they sow.This is the unfortunate scenario men and women are faced with as the provocateurs are left go unchecked and unchallenged.

The rule of law is not a concession from the men to the women and equality before the law is not the rule of Darwinism.

...
What do YOU think?

...

I think that there is no need whatsoever to classify, that sexual identities are not a thing and that everyone should be free to do whatever they feel as long as there is mutual consent among all the parties involved.

The whole debates makes little sense. I am tired of being fed with news about women doing stuff because I already know they do and can do stuff. Yes, everyone should be equal before the law, have the same opportunities and perhaps some gender discriminatory legal protection and perks if that is needed for their safety and progress. I do not need to hear about it, I do not need to hear "superstraights" crap on how superior they feel nor how gays like to do stuff on different holes or play scissors.

On a modern society, this should not even be a debate. Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Oh, and yes I know, in half of Latin-America, large bits of Russia, many Muslim countries and the best part of Africa and in the US Bible belt they still live in the middle ages on this aspect, so all I ask is for them to keep their shit to themselves.