Which One of This Features of a Coin Would Make You Invest Your Time and Money?

[coinswebid]

i like to do my deep research to a coin with no ICO and no premine also to an NFT project my friend
and usually when the project look good i will drop my money after researching

[jcha777]

My favorite coins are those with a Proof of Work system and no Pre-Mine. In my opinion, No ICO and No Pre-Mine prevent us from pumping and dumping because usually the distribution is fair and no individual or entity holds the largest coin.

Exactly. That is why Hacash stands out. The community is small, still, 1 HAC is valued at around $0.5. 

[BuNga_cute]

The more complete the features of a coin, the more it will attract investors to invest in these coins. The problem is that each coin has advantages
and disadvantages. So there can't be coins that have complete features. Therefore, if we find a coin that fulfills the 3 features that have been
mentioned the opening post is very feasible for investment.

[JeffBrad12]

My favorite coins are those with a Proof of Work system and no Pre-Mine. In my opinion, No ICO and No Pre-Mine prevent us from pumping and dumping because usually the distribution is fair and no individual or entity holds the largest coin.

It's not even fair, the buyers of coins got nothing for their money and they can get only the coins from the miners. This is also making the network being controlled by the miners. The best thing should be the hybrid system that will let the buyers of tokens participate in the governance too. When there are lots of drama between miners and it will be making so many fork coins like what happened with bitcoin. Ethereum can't fix its scalability problem due to the miners.
This has proven if POW is not so good as people said.
It must be fair if the buyers, holders, and miners were able participating in the governance.

[bitcon]

I always pay attention to these characteristics. The value of the coin! There are a lot of BTC and ETH clones, but these tokens do not have the same value as ancestors.
Relevance is also important, the work of developers is also important. Blockchain creators must engage in the project and work on its improvements, otherwise, over time, vulnerabilities will appear that will lead to irreversible consequences.
News about growth, development, cooperation with other projects.

But the most important thing when choosing a coin is to discern its real potential in order to profit from your investment.

[memyselfandi]

In fact a lot of coin has the same features not just HACASH. But the question, if those features are the ideal features of a project/token then how come that those project who has it are still not supported and invested by most of the people and worst, becoming declining daily.

[lalabotax]

And what if I say HACASH has it all. The perfect "Monetary Nature" We are searching for.[/center][/size]

So actually, the point of your post is only here, introducing or promoting HACASH. I don't know how it is and also not willing to know it. Moreover the si not yet in COinGekco.
New projects always claim having competed for perfect things that a cryptocurrency must be BUt, can they survive? Can they prove that they are the best and the most perfect ones?
No, The value can tell the truth

[RussianEnglishTranslation]

1. Fair Distribution

2. Privacy

3. Store of value

4. Channel Chain Interest

5. High Divisibility

6. Real-time offline settlement.

7. No ICO & No Premine

8. Anti-51% Attack

9. Decentralized

10. NFT

And what if I say HACASH has it all. The perfect "Monetary Nature" We are searching for.

[/size]

Fair distribution is the most important and that includes #7. That's why I invested in RVN and 0xMR, both are POW projects with no premine or dev wallet.

[isaac_clarke22]

Well decentralized is what I care the most that's why I first invested in Bitcoin.
I don't want any authorities to be involved with how much I hold.
I am quite puzzled on what OP wants to point out.
Is he promoting a coin or making up a discussion to be talked about here?

[jrrsparkles]

We have coins with all those features already and they are already exist abundance like thousands of tokens with the same idea. Then you need something special about the project to be invested like the real use case that just bump and dump coin.

[Ucy]

Wanted to write that I can't choose one without other important features on the list until I noticed this at the end of your post: "what if I say hacash has it all". The list doesn't have other important features though but it is better than just choosing one feature.
A cryptocurrency has to have the main important features of decentralized cryptocurrency existing together to be considered safe by me.

[so98nn]

Anti-51% attacks. No man, why would I invest my money to make 51% attack possible anyway? Also, to get that much mining power I would need huge amount of investment, bigger infra ever built by all the miners until now. It is next to impossible thing to happen currently. In fact I would say I am Anti-(Anti-51%) guy who would mine for nominal profits from the daily mining and be happy about it. 

I am investing my time and money into crypto because of its ever growing popularity in the world. It has just started with all this and the journey is still pretty long considering the last bitcoin to be mined after 100+ years. So I know very well that I am pretty secure about my investment. 

[Reid]

I don't know anything about what you are shilling but just to answer the question, store of value is my pick.
Long-term holding.
Instead of just relying upon banks with all your money with just a little interest then, I would rather choose a cryptocurrency with a good future.
So the features of the projects will be next and so on and forth.
Everything is important in the end.

[acdc]

Surprisingly, there are a lot of coins that are full of factors yet but still cannot achieve success.
For a coin to be successful depends on many factors, including the promotion of the product and having a strong team behind it supporting it.