[WARNING] Dynarian - Plagiarized Whitepaper

[qwertyup23]

What happened: Plagiarized Contents

• Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3241387
• DYNARIAN ANN: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5325157.0
• DYNARIAN ANN Archived : https://archive.fo/VOJOM
• DYNARIAN Website: https://www.dynarian.com/
• DYNARIAN Whitepaper: https://www.dynarian.com/download/DYNARIAN-Whitepaper-en.pdf
  

Code:

30 days old
Created on 2021-02-17
Expires on 2022-02-17
Updated on 2021-02-17

FLAG: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2670

READ: The contents of the whitepaper have been plagiarized and modified from bitcoin's whitepaper. Some minor modifications from the wordings were done.  

Copied content:

• https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
• https://copyleaks.com/dashboard/v1/businesses/report/yjuven8gy50i9qhq/preview?key=sjcowpddlcwkjsyb&suspectId=0f7a7b4df2&viewMode=one-to-one&contentMode=html&sourcePage=1&suspectPage=1

[TheUltraElite]

Newbie account posting an ANN that is copy pasted from bitcoin whitepaper is not new to the scammers manifesto. Domain is newly registered as well.

Hoping this should save some noobs into putting their money into this scammers wallets. They also have a wallet software - malware security experts on this forum should be able to sandbox and analyse the code and see if there is any hidden malware too. These are things that every new investor should do before putting their money in.

There is also description of the team behind the project. Flag supported.

[andrei8787]

Reported to Cryptoscamalert
https://cryptoscamalert.com/crypto_scam_report/1212

[JEBDYN]

We have rectified the opinion of a forum user the whitepaper, partly understanding it but not sharing the form or the modes. We inform the entire community and other users that our official and rectified whitepaper (version in English and Spanish) are version 1.0 of March 28 of the current year. We consider the matter settled.
We request that all the contents inside and outside the forum about this accusation be removed, which with the opinion and understanding we have rectified and you can review.

Hemos rectificado por opinión de un usuario del foro los whitepaper, en parte entendiendola pero no compartiendo ni la forma ni los modos. Informamos a toda la comunidad y resto de usuarios que nuestros whitepaper (versión en ingles y español) oficiales y rectificados son la versión 1.0 del 28 de marzo del cforriente año. Damos por zanjado el tema.
Solicitamos que se quiten todos los contenidos dentro y fuera del foro sobre esta esta acusación la cual con la opinion y entendimiento hemos rectificados y podéis revisar.

[robelneo]

We have rectified the opinion of a forum user the whitepaper, partly understanding it but not sharing the form or the modes. We inform the entire community and other users that our official and rectified whitepaper (version in English and Spanish) are version 1.0 of March 28 of the current year. We consider the matter settled.
We request that all the contents inside and outside the forum about this accusation be removed, which with the opinion and understanding we have rectified and you can review.

The accusation will stand because you have done it intentionally, cheap developers and projects with the intention of deceiving investors are the ones plagiarizing whitepaper and contents, I don't think it will be removed when launching a project that is related to Cryptocurrency, investors are looking for uniqueness and what it can offer to the community since you don't have a unique idea, you resorted to copy-pasting.

[stompix]

We request that all the contents inside and outside the forum about this accusation be removed, which with the opinion and understanding we have rectified and you can review.

That's not how things work here, you should have done a bit of research before trying this scheme.

We have rectified the opinion of a forum user the whitepaper, partly understanding it but not sharing the form or the modes. We inform the entire community and other users that our official and rectified whitepaper (version in English and Spanish) are version 1.0 of March 28 of the current year. We consider the matter settled.

You might consider the matter settled, but the fact is that your first version of the whitepaper is plagiarized, that thing will not change no matter how many whitepapers and revisions you throw around. Besides, the single fact that you can change the basic description of how your project is supposed to work so easily makes it clear it's just a joke.

I'm looking at you're so-called whitepaper right not and all I can see is the laziest text spinning I've encountered lately.
And that disclaimer:

** Any similarity of this whitepaper in its explanation at a technical / operational level with an existing one, both of the project's base open codes (Bitcoin, PPcoin and Novacoin) and another unrelated one, has to be understood only as coincidences in the operational base of the crypto assets

Coincidence? Do you mean that just by coincidence you've managed to write down exactly what Satoshi did?

Built on the foundation of Bitcoin, PPCoin, and NovaCoin, innovations like proof-of-stake and scrypt will help further advance the cryptocurrency arena.

Wow, such innovations, what's next, the wheel?

[blackened515]

 I could not see any legitimate information about the site apart from being SSL certified which anyone can have within 5 mins, The registrant address and phone number is hidden. The site was just registered last month. I do not trust, people should just stay clear of it if they really care about their assets.

[qwertyup23]

We have rectified the opinion of a forum user the whitepaper, partly understanding it but not sharing the form or the modes. We inform the entire community and other users that our official and rectified whitepaper (version in English and Spanish) are version 1.0 of March 28 of the current year. We consider the matter settled.
We request that all the contents inside and outside the forum about this accusation be removed, which with the opinion and understanding we have rectified and you can review.

When I confronted you about your plagiarized whitepaper, you mentioned about changing it into your own versions. Unfortunately, you cannot remedy anymore your situation by providing another whitepaper. The fact that you have initially plagiarized your first whitepaper does not delete the fact that you had the intention of fooling everyone.

I will not delete my negative trust due to the anomalies in your whitepaper and the messages posted by the fellow members here.

[$crypto$]

We have rectified the opinion of a forum user the whitepaper, partly understanding it but not sharing the form or the modes. We inform the entire community and other users that our official and rectified whitepaper (version in English and Spanish) are version 1.0 of March 28 of the current year. We consider the matter settled.
We request that all the contents inside and outside the forum about this accusation be removed, which with the opinion and understanding we have rectified and you can review.

When I confronted you about your plagiarized whitepaper, you mentioned about changing it into your own versions. Unfortunately, you cannot remedy anymore your situation by providing another whitepaper. The fact that you have initially plagiarized your first whitepaper does not delete the fact that you had the intention of fooling everyone.

I will not delete my negative trust due to the anomalies in your whitepaper and the messages posted by the fellow members here.

Whitepapers are an important part of a project so if a project is plagiarized it is clear that it will fool the community regardless of what in the future it will be nonsense what they talk about as a project goal in the future.

Problem will be fatal where the community will know how important the whitepaper is so it is clear that whatever the WP has been revised with your word I am sure they only replace the word and concept with the plagiarism they had at the beginning.