How to win at roulette?

[markk1]

Hello everyone! Do you think it is possible to beat european roulette wheel with 37 numbers? Personally, at one time I tried to get up on the faucets, nothing came of it. I tried different strategies, all strategies lead to a loss sooner or later. Not so long ago, I went to a well-known crypto casino and decided to play with a 15-bet Martingale. Set the autospin to double in color with a drop of + 100%. It took about 5 minutes and I got the opposite color 15 times and I lost everything. To calculate the house edge for Straight Up bets in roulette, all you have to do is divide the difference of 1 by the number of the pockets on the wheel, which in this case is 37. So, 1/37 = 0.027027027 which makes for 2.70% (0.027027027 x 100 = 2.70270). There is also American roulette with two zeros and high house edge. The house edge on all bets is 1/19, or 5.26%, except for the 0-00-1-2-3 combination, which carries a house edge of 7.89%. Let's discuss roulette, who had what wash and experience in roulette.

[1715577666]

1715577666

[1715577666]

1715577666

[1715577666]

1715577666

[1715577666]

1715577666

[ryzaadit]

Even with cover 30 number you still got a chance to lose ~XD.

IMO, is really hard no matter what your strategy in the longer term you can be lost and yeah house always wins. But, I still playing roulette just not really often playing while other games does not gives me a good result then I will come to roulette.

[markk1]

Even with cover 30 number you still got a chance to lose ~XD.

IMO, is really hard no matter what your strategy in the longer term you can be lost and yeah house always wins. But, I still playing roulette just not really often playing while other games does not gives me a good result then I will come to roulette.

I think maybe 50 times to give one color mixed with zero, but for this to work, it may take one year of playing for this to come out.
It's impossible to catch such a thing in blackjack, there is less house edge. One-deck blackjack of course.
As long as I played blackjack, the biggest streak of losses was about 12 times.

[hopenotlate]

It's way more simple than you can imagine : just run a roulette business and you will be sitting on a nice 2.70% house edge,  talking about European roulette ( single zero one) , that is quite a bit of HE considering most of dice sites have around 1% and the most of players keep on losing to dice as well.

Joking a bit but not even that much.

Seriously speaking to win big on roulette imo you just have to make one single allin bet and pray for luck ...like this guy did.

[iv4n]

It's way more simple than you can imagine : just run a roulette business and you will be sitting on a nice 2.70% house edge,  talking about European roulette ( single zero one) , that is quite a bit of HE considering most of dice sites have around 1% and the most of players keep on losing to dice as well.

Joking a bit but not even that much.

Seriously speaking to win big on roulette imo you just have to make one single allin bet and pray for luck ...like this guy did.

I saw this guy long ago... crazy decision, but he had luck and won! So much about that! We should check the casino where he placed bet, it's definitely provably fair one!

Roulette is a crazy game! I love to play roulette occasionally and I have some of my own strategies I like to chase... I won and lost a lot in trying, it's all I can say! For roulette, you need to risk a lot if you wish to win a lot, and hitting zeros and numbers ain't easy at all!

Other than that, chasing red/black, pair/even at x2, or x3 for some part of the board... is not worth even trying! Martingale here is not working, soon a losing streak will come, in my case every time sooner than I thought!

[markk1]

There is also no zero roulette, but it is very rare in casinos. I don't know for sure, but it seems like the payments are understated or a commission is charged for each bet.

[AmoreJaz]

I think that in roulette there is no certain strategy and everything depends on luck... Just like in dice...
To tell the truth I do not understand this entertainment, in my opinion it is much more interesting to lose money in the slot machines!

basically, this is luck-based game. there is no such thing as working strategy on this one. if you want to increase your chances, you need to place bet on many parts of the board. but still, there is no assurance where the ball will come to rest. so yeah, this is a game of chance. dont chase winning in this game. because there is no exact formula. 
you can only increase your chance of winning but no technique will guarantee your winning

[ralle14]

You can't beat roulette no matter how you view it differently because the house edge immediately puts you at a slight disadvantage. You could get one or two profitable run but later on you'll lose because you can't always avoid the zeroes.

I've mentioned this in a different roulette thread but i've played this rare roulette table where you'll get half of your money back when the ball lands on zero cutting the house edge down a bit but I don't know what type of roulette it's called though.

[Quidat]

Nah, better not to stress out yourself on beating up roulette game.Of over all the years ive been playing and trying out several methods or strategies
to be profitable with this game but i do still fail if im not really that lucky on that particular moment.You can only tell that strategy works if you do make
money but if not then you would say its useless.You would only have those common words that would spit up into your mouth because nothing
really works in the first place. Roulette is a game of luck and thinking of about HE is always there.

[markk1]

You can't beat roulette no matter how you view it differently because the house edge immediately puts you at a slight disadvantage. You could get one or two profitable run but later on you'll lose because you can't always avoid the zeroes.

I've mentioned this in a different roulette thread but i've played this rare roulette table where you'll get half of your money back when the ball lands on zero cutting the house edge down a bit but I don't know what type of roulette it's called though.

You can beat the roulette, there is a 100% working strategy. But you need 2 conditions: you must have an infinite bankroll and also the maximum bet in roulette must not have any restrictions and play Martingale strategy.

[Lanatsa]

You can't beat roulette no matter how you view it differently because the house edge immediately puts you at a slight disadvantage. You could get one or two profitable run but later on you'll lose because you can't always avoid the zeroes.

I've mentioned this in a different roulette thread but i've played this rare roulette table where you'll get half of your money back when the ball lands on zero cutting the house edge down a bit but I don't know what type of roulette it's called though.

You can beat the roulette, there is a 100% working strategy. But you need 2 conditions: you must have an infinite bankroll and also the maximum bet in roulette must not have any restrictions and play Martingale strategy.

Don't know if you are really serious with this one or some sort of sarcasm on here. 
All of people do say the same thing.Infinite bankroll does happen only in dreams.Martingale is a common strategy.It doesn't work.

Try to look up some YT vid and I do see this one.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vOj7erZz3RQ

[Kasabus]

The calculation is just making gambling so complicated to us, in the end we will still lose and any strategy could turn out to be a waste of time.

Honestly, I tried different strategy, I tied to implement all in my mind but unfortunately, nothing works for me in the long run.
The big hindrance to that is the house edge, with that in place, our only chance of winning is through luck and short term win, the rest is all gambling sites favor.

[livingfree]

You can beat the roulette, there is a 100% working strategy. But you need 2 conditions: you must have an infinite bankroll and also the maximum bet in roulette must not have any restrictions and play Martingale strategy.

When I've read the term word "infinite" I've already figured it out that you're going to martingale. Well, that's an impossible thing to have an infinite bankroll.

There's no sense in gambling if you have an infinite bankroll because you're just going to lose it. And it's better not to gamble if you have that infinite source.

I'll just enjoy having it than to gamble if I'm in that status.

[uray]

You can beat the roulette, there is a 100% working strategy. But you need 2 conditions: you must have an infinite bankroll and also the maximum bet in roulette must not have any restrictions and play Martingale strategy.

So what you do to have an infinite bankroll, take over the central bank and then play roulette  . There is no working strategy that will give you a win hundred percent all the time, it is all about luck and nothing else. If it is a skill based game then you can have a chance and not with games with chances.

[johhnyUA]

Hello everyone! Do you think it is possible to beat european roulette wheel with 37 numbers?

I'm not roulette pro and i need a little time to calculate exact probabilities, but I'm doubt about the fact that you can beat it. EV is still negative, so on long run you will lost everything.

Even if there is some strategies, noone will share it with you (and personally i doubt that such strategies exists)

[qory]

Try the Martingale system for example. And please make sure you are aware of the table limits. But let me remind you: no system has a guaranteed profit.

[Natalim]

Try the Martingale system for example. And please make sure you are aware of the table limits. But let me remind you: no system has a guaranteed profit.

And you forget to mentioned, not strategy would work in long term in a game where there's a house edge. Roulette has a high house edge, as I searched in google, the house edge is "5.26%"... so if you cannot win in dice where there's only 0.5% to 1% house edge, how much more in roulette?

[johhnyUA]

Try the Martingale system for example. And please make sure you are aware of the table limits. But let me remind you: no system has a guaranteed profit.

What a useless advice? Martingale is allowed only in games with two outcomes, like head or tail, dice and so on. In games with complicated probabilites, or with such as here (1 / 37 if we bet on one number) you will lose everything in few rounds. Sometimes it's better to not write anything  

And second moment, that even in head or tails, Martingale is losing strategy. So just do not advice anyone to use it, thx)

[stadus]

Try the Martingale system for example. And please make sure you are aware of the table limits. But let me remind you: no system has a guaranteed profit.

What a useless advice? Martingale is allowed only in games with two outcomes, like head or tail, dice and so on. In games with complicated probabilites, or with such as here (1 / 37 if we bet on one number) you will lose everything in few rounds. Sometimes it's better to not write anything  

It would only work on the red and black on roulette, but not in numbers, however, there's still no guarantee that this method would succeed since for sure you will not be allowed to put unlimited bets and cold streak is still possible though.

And second moment, that even in head or tails, Martingale is losing strategy. So just do not advice anyone to use it, thx)

House limit will kill that strategy.

[Hydrogen]

Interesting topic.

They say the earth with its mountains and valleys is a more perfect sphere per scale than any ball bearing. I've wondered if physical roulette tables have deformities and imperfections that lead to uneven statistics over time. Imagine if it were possible to record 20,000 games on a roulette wheel. Compile the statistics. Utilize the data to formulate a gambling strategy. I wonder if anyone has tried that. And either failed or enjoyed success with it.

Digital roulette is made from RNG (random number generator) and computer algorithms. For it to be fair there should be something resembling a 50/50 split on results. In 100 games of roulette near to half would hit red with the rest being black. If someone played 100 games of roulette and bet black each time, with the result being red each time. That could be where things might get a little strange.

If profits are the goal than gambling on sports is preferable to dice or roulette IMO. Games of skill like poker are also better.