🏆🥉 [ANN] Crypto Awards - Ratings that can be trusted🥉🏆

[Crypto Awards]

How it works

Top nominees

Last reviews

[ataArt]

Will the winners be awarded online or at a conference?

[Crypto Awards]

Granting winners is planned to be held at Blockchain Fest 2021 (December) https://blockchain-fest.com
If mass events are allowed because of COVID 19

[Twinkledoe]

Who will choose the lineup of those market experts? And is this project backed by certain sponsors? Because without sponsors, I don't think it would be easy for the team to make this a successful event. And if this will happen by June, I don't think the world is ready for massive event. Remember, other parts of the world are still having their lockdown because of the new variant of covid. Are you considering this event to be online, in case the attendees are not that high.

[Crypto Awards]

People vote and write reviews! Crypto Awards: people's choice Best of the Best.
Sponsors support the conference. And this event will be with a conference. We do a lot of similar events.
TradersFair.com https://tradersfair.com

Traders Awards, Forex Awards and now new event - Crypto Awards with the new website and the new voting concept

https://www.youtube.com/finexpo

Event for December 2021! It will either be in Cyprus or Singapore, we'll see at the end of the year. There will also be an online broadcast on Youtube.

[pantek talacuik]

Who will choose the lineup of those market experts? And is this project backed by certain sponsors? Because without sponsors, I don't think it would be easy for the team to make this a successful event. And if this will happen by June, I don't think the world is ready for massive event. Remember, other parts of the world are still having their lockdown because of the new variant of covid. Are you considering this event to be online, in case the attendees are not that high.

This event will be a little confusing somewhere later. COVID is one of the reasons for not growing in large numbers and I agree with you that they have to have a large sponsor to make this approach run smoothly in the future. Or maybe they have a lot of capital to fund it all.

[bakasabo]

How do you check if the reviews were written honestly, and just to get a reward? Or how do you tell if a review is useful or not?
For example take a look in Exchange section on Curve Finance review. "Its very good" because it is easy to use. Same can be said about almost every exchange. Second exchange that got a review - Coinbase. A review was written by a person that is not a trader. How can this be approved?

[DaMut]

How do you check if the reviews were written honestly, and just to get a reward? Or how do you tell if a review is useful or not?
For example take a look in Exchange section on Curve Finance review. "Its very good" because it is easy to use. Same can be said about almost every exchange. Second exchange that got a review - Coinbase. A review was written by a person that is not a trader. How can this be approved?

You can not, since trust is just a gimmick.
not going to lie I have seen something like this before on https://revain.org/, at the very beginning even they were encouraging people to write a review about something like an exchange, a platform and etc to get incentive from them and if you compare both of them you should see some similarity which means the review will not be created naturally. at least revain does not highlight trust on their platform.

[CaVO32]

How do you check if the reviews were written honestly, and just to get a reward? Or how do you tell if a review is useful or not?
For example take a look in Exchange section on Curve Finance review. "Its very good" because it is easy to use. Same can be said about almost every exchange. Second exchange that got a review - Coinbase. A review was written by a person that is not a trader. How can this be approved?

You can not, since trust is just a gimmick.
not going to lie I have seen something like this before on https://revain.org/, at the very beginning even they were encouraging people to write a review about something like an exchange, a platform and etc to get incentive from them and if you compare both of them you should see some similarity which means the review will not be created naturally. at least revain does not highlight trust on their platform.

I'll just wait if they can actually make this event happen in the specified schedule. And if there will really be attendees despite that a lot of countries are experiencing the second wave of covid owed to these new strains. If not, we will see it via online and check out how they will present this type of event. More than likely, most of the reviews will be biased because it is according to the viewer. But we will see if the recipients truly deserve their respective awards. 

[St.D1]

How do you check if the reviews were written honestly, and just to get a reward? Or how do you tell if a review is useful or not?
For example take a look in Exchange section on Curve Finance review. "Its very good" because it is easy to use. Same can be said about almost every exchange. Second exchange that got a review - Coinbase. A review was written by a person that is not a trader. How can this be approved?

So write an honest review and check it out!
Based on your logic, a person who is not a trader does not have the right to use the exchange and leave his opinion?

[Crypto Awards]

How do you check if the reviews were written honestly, and just to get a reward? Or how do you tell if a review is useful or not?
For example take a look in Exchange section on Curve Finance review. "Its very good" because it is easy to use. Same can be said about almost every exchange. Second exchange that got a review - Coinbase. A review was written by a person that is not a trader. How can this be approved?

You can not, since trust is just a gimmick.
not going to lie I have seen something like this before on https://revain.org/, at the very beginning even they were encouraging people to write a review about something like an exchange, a platform and etc to get incentive from them and if you compare both of them you should see some similarity which means the review will not be created naturally. at least revain does not highlight trust on their platform.

I know this platform, it's just a review platform, we don't force you to write, we just reward the winners as the best company. And anyone writes bad or good company and that's it.
CRYPTO AWARDS - ranking where each nominee is competing for the honour to be named the Best of the Best. And let the people choose and we will announce the results

[disconnectme]

How do you check if the reviews were written honestly, and just to get a reward? Or how do you tell if a review is useful or not?
For example take a look in Exchange section on Curve Finance review. "Its very good" because it is easy to use. Same can be said about almost every exchange. Second exchange that got a review - Coinbase. A review was written by a person that is not a trader. How can this be approved?

You can not, since trust is just a gimmick.
not going to lie I have seen something like this before on https://revain.org/, at the very beginning even they were encouraging people to write a review about something like an exchange, a platform and etc to get incentive from them and if you compare both of them you should see some similarity which means the review will not be created naturally. at least revain does not highlight trust on their platform.

I know this platform, it's just a review platform, we don't force you to write, we just reward the winners as the best company. And anyone writes bad or good company and that's it.
CRYPTO AWARDS - ranking where each nominee is competing for the honour to be named the Best of the Best. And let the people choose and we will announce the results

This is why it can easily be abused, just look at most of the exchange listings that involves voting, most f the projects incentivise people to go and vote for them and if something like this happen it has defeated the whole aim of your project because this means the award goes to the project that can incentives more especially in crypto where people have prices, Youtubers, Twitter influencers and telegram group are paid to shill the projects of a price or token allocation

[tippytoes]

How do you check if the reviews were written honestly, and just to get a reward? Or how do you tell if a review is useful or not?
For example take a look in Exchange section on Curve Finance review. "Its very good" because it is easy to use. Same can be said about almost every exchange. Second exchange that got a review - Coinbase. A review was written by a person that is not a trader. How can this be approved?

You can not, since trust is just a gimmick.
not going to lie I have seen something like this before on https://revain.org/, at the very beginning even they were encouraging people to write a review about something like an exchange, a platform and etc to get incentive from them and if you compare both of them you should see some similarity which means the review will not be created naturally. at least revain does not highlight trust on their platform.

I know this platform, it's just a review platform, we don't force you to write, we just reward the winners as the best company. And anyone writes bad or good company and that's it.
CRYPTO AWARDS - ranking where each nominee is competing for the honour to be named the Best of the Best. And let the people choose and we will announce the results

This is why it can easily be abused, just look at most of the exchange listings that involves voting, most f the projects incentivise people to go and vote for them and if something like this happen it has defeated the whole aim of your project because this means the award goes to the project that can incentives more especially in crypto where people have prices, Youtubers, Twitter influencers and telegram group are paid to shill the projects of a price or token allocation

If that will happen, they are just fooling themselves to receive such award. Because they know if they paid a lot of these viewers just to get that award. Will it be satisfactory from their end? I don't think so. And those that will review such feedbacks should also have their expertise on that particular subject. Otherwise, how can they gauge that such reviews are valid and logical? And in this regard, they need veteran crypto users because if they are just newbie in this field, I don't think they can provide constructive criticism on the subject matter.

[Crypto Awards]

How do you check if the reviews were written honestly, and just to get a reward? Or how do you tell if a review is useful or not?
For example take a look in Exchange section on Curve Finance review. "Its very good" because it is easy to use. Same can be said about almost every exchange. Second exchange that got a review - Coinbase. A review was written by a person that is not a trader. How can this be approved?

You can not, since trust is just a gimmick.
not going to lie I have seen something like this before on https://revain.org/, at the very beginning even they were encouraging people to write a review about something like an exchange, a platform and etc to get incentive from them and if you compare both of them you should see some similarity which means the review will not be created naturally. at least revain does not highlight trust on their platform.

I know this platform, it's just a review platform, we don't force you to write, we just reward the winners as the best company. And anyone writes bad or good company and that's it.
CRYPTO AWARDS - ranking where each nominee is competing for the honour to be named the Best of the Best. And let the people choose and we will announce the results

This is why it can easily be abused, just look at most of the exchange listings that involves voting, most f the projects incentivise people to go and vote for them and if something like this happen it has defeated the whole aim of your project because this means the award goes to the project that can incentives more especially in crypto where people have prices, Youtubers, Twitter influencers and telegram group are paid to shill the projects of a price or token allocation

If that will happen, they are just fooling themselves to receive such award. Because they know if they paid a lot of these viewers just to get that award. Will it be satisfactory from their end? I don't think so. And those that will review such feedbacks should also have their expertise on that particular subject. Otherwise, how can they gauge that such reviews are valid and logical? And in this regard, they need veteran crypto users because if they are just newbie in this field, I don't think they can provide constructive criticism on the subject matter.

any review is valuable and a large number of reviews will yield an average score. The opinion of anyone in the crypto world is important to us

a professional can also be paid by the firm

voting is not just a vote, but also a review everyone reads what the person voted for and the community will realise it is a scam or respond to this feedback
this month we will add feedback on the reviews

we need more people and then there will be fair ratings
the company can also respond to each assessment and feedback
we say all write an honest review and rate!
and each company has the right to call on its supporters to vote

[SFR10]

Came here after reading a thread ^{[probably by one of your team members]} on meta...

3.8.6. the author left reviews about the same exchange or company under different user names;

What type of security measures you have in place to combat such issues? Is it based on IPs, content, or something else?

PROBLEM SOLVING
If the exchange/company solves the problem on the review with a negative score (from 1 to 3), the user has the opportunity to report this to the site Administration. This will have a positive effect on the company's rating.

Does it mean that you've notified every single one of the platforms that you've listed prior to their listings?
It's always nice to see another review platform but it's getting harder and harder to trust online ratings/reviews.

[Crypto Awards]

Came here after reading a thread ^{[probably by one of your team members]} on meta...

3.8.6. the author left reviews about the same exchange or company under different user names;

What type of security measures you have in place to combat such issues? Is it based on IPs, content, or something else?

PROBLEM SOLVING
If the exchange/company solves the problem on the review with a negative score (from 1 to 3), the user has the opportunity to report this to the site Administration. This will have a positive effect on the company's rating.

Does it mean that you've notified every single one of the platforms that you've listed prior to their listings?
It's always nice to see another review platform but it's getting harder and harder to trust online ratings/reviews.

We have a lot of ambassadors working at this stage - it could be anyone/most likely a simple passerby or BitcoinTalk user

This is what moderation on the rating is for, to prevent fraud - we check and control this: 1 user = 1 rating/feedback

Everyone who gets listed on the rating gets an official letter.
It really is a people's rating - people leave their feedback based on their experience.

[Twinkledoe]

-
We have a lot of ambassadors working at this stage - it could be anyone/most likely a simple passerby or BitcoinTalk user

This is what moderation on the rating is for, to prevent fraud - we check and control this: 1 user = 1 rating/feedback

Everyone who gets listed on the rating gets an official letter.
It really is a people's rating - people leave their feedback based on their experience.

Any developments on this project? Seems people are not very interested here. Is this the reason why we are lagging behind in this voting category - best crypto forum? Bitcointalk forum users are not active? Seems that cryptotalk will win here??? But we all know which forum is the best, right?