See why most bounty hunters get scammed

[btcltcdigger]

Bounty Hunters Don't Read

This thread Explains it

However, won't be surprised to see another application below   lol

They refuse to read the thread very well and understand the rules

They are very much in a haste to earn and that is why they earn up being scammed.

They sheepishly follow existing application

They refuse to doubt when it sounds too good to be true

***** Just imagine application kept coming in, in an April Fool's Thread.
Are these applications from bots...

In my experience, most of these hunters don't even speak english, let alone read what's written.
They've just been instructed to apply and do the tasks. It's very sad

[LordMiguel]

i think most of those registration are coming from bots and also there are people that does not read properly. all they care about is to see a thread with the title BOUNTY. they jumped in. i saw projects that ended months ago and people are still registering untill the moderator starts adding negative trust to all new registrants. most times, some people use it to fill up new spam accounts. just saying..

[Inspiron14]

the first is because of the bad bounty manager, and the second one is choosing the wrong bounty,
that's why many are affected by scammers, I've participated in several bounties and the results were bad,
that's how it is, we as bounty hunters are indeed the risks

[slashz9]

it's true that most bounty hunters don't read the rules and only follow directions like the first time they followed it even though it's possible that every project provides different rules, usually this is done by newbie accounts which I'm also surprised they understand doing bounty social media, articles, videos and almost all other types of campaigns.

[v3liana]

Agree most of the participant is very lazy to read, they just want to read about how many task they need to do. So, when he didnt get the stake or reward because of hes fault but they can't accept it.. Then he go to the official telegram channel from the bounty they support and keep typing "Scam" Or etc.

[Sendi blackspade team]

Agree most of the participant is very lazy to read, they just want to read about how many task they need to do. So, when he didnt get the stake or reward because of hes fault but they can't accept it.. Then he go to the official telegram channel from the bounty they support and keep typing "Scam" Or etc.

it was the action of the new stupid bounty hunter. those who have been looking for and working on projects from the bounty campaign certainly understand how we should work.
most just vote by origin without knowing what they support.

[laohe628]

Being scammed i think is not almost the bounty hunter's fault, some projects look good, but also have the possibility of running away. Even an experienced bounty hunter crosses a ship in the ditch likely at any time. Anyway, we must be caution when we choosed a bounty project to join.

[bryant.coleman]

Being scammed i think is not almost the bounty hunter's fault, some projects look good, but also have the possibility of running away. Even an experienced bounty hunter crosses a ship in the ditch likely at any time. Anyway, we must be caution when we choosed a bounty project to join.

There are certain hard decisions to make and some of the bounty hunters don't follow these. Many get so desperate that they unwillingly join campaigns which looks suspicious, or being managed by users with bad reputation. One of the rules that I follow is not to join any campaign that runs for more than 6 weeks. This reduces the wastage of our effort, in case the campaign refuses to make the payment. But many of the bounty hunters are still willing to join campaigns that run for many months.

[slashz9]

Being scammed i think is not almost the bounty hunter's fault, some projects look good, but also have the possibility of running away. Even an experienced bounty hunter crosses a ship in the ditch likely at any time. Anyway, we must be caution when we choosed a bounty project to join.

There are certain hard decisions to make and some of the bounty hunters don't follow these. Many get so desperate that they unwillingly join campaigns which looks suspicious, or being managed by users with bad reputation. One of the rules that I follow is not to join any campaign that runs for more than 6 weeks. This reduces the wastage of our effort, in case the campaign refuses to make the payment. But many of the bounty hunters are still willing to join campaigns that run for many months.

hmm quite interesting where I don't really care about the duration of the campaign, maybe in the future I can follow your way to avoid taking too long to promote a project.
but if it looks promising maybe i will still promote it 

[bison]

actually, there is nothing wrong with participating in many campaigns in one or many projects. we are not forbidden to do so as long as we know the risks. because not all projects pay, we must be selective in choosing.
working on a bounty campaign should be different from an airdrop campaign. because the bounty has more tasks and campaign types. following a lot of projects, I'm sure it will be very inconvenient for some people to work on it.

I agree with you, we have to be more selective about the projects that we will participate in, because the possibility of the project will only be a scam. It's a shame if we are tired of thinking about being disciplined in carrying out tasks in the bounty project and at the end of the allocation we don't get anything, considering that the tasks in the bounty campaign project are more than the airdrop campaign project.

[viananda2525]

actually, there is nothing wrong with participating in many campaigns in one or many projects. we are not forbidden to do so as long as we know the risks. because not all projects pay, we must be selective in choosing.
working on a bounty campaign should be different from an airdrop campaign. because the bounty has more tasks and campaign types. following a lot of projects, I'm sure it will be very inconvenient for some people to work on it.

I agree with you, we have to be more selective about the projects that we will participate in, because the possibility of the project will only be a scam. It's a shame if we are tired of thinking about being disciplined in carrying out tasks in the bounty project and at the end of the allocation we don't get anything, considering that the tasks in the bounty campaign project are more than the airdrop campaign project.

we were doing more task than airdrop program, even its running more than a month and spend our effort alot. so if we want to earn money in the end of periode we have to very selective in which campaign we have to do. research and filtering must do before we join in any campaign.

[calandra78]

actually, there is nothing wrong with participating in many campaigns in one or many projects. we are not forbidden to do so as long as we know the risks. because not all projects pay, we must be selective in choosing.
working on a bounty campaign should be different from an airdrop campaign. because the bounty has more tasks and campaign types. following a lot of projects, I'm sure it will be very inconvenient for some people to work on it.

I agree with you, we have to be more selective about the projects that we will participate in, because the possibility of the project will only be a scam. It's a shame if we are tired of thinking about being disciplined in carrying out tasks in the bounty project and at the end of the allocation we don't get anything, considering that the tasks in the bounty campaign project are more than the airdrop campaign project.

we were doing more task than airdrop program, even its running more than a month and spend our effort alot. so if we want to earn money in the end of periode we have to very selective in which campaign we have to do. research and filtering must do before we join in any campaign.

that's the problem. because sometimes most bounty hunters just become fanatical followers of the bounty manager. and when he published a bounty hunter campaign his followers would always participate regardless of the project's capabilities.
even though some bounty managers have clearly stated that they only post for the bounty thread and are not part of the manager and team. remember we should read more.

[theinvestdude]

I laugh when I see many comments about been picky or selective when choosing projects to promote, isn't this why many missed out on the best bounties on this forum? I mean some projects looks so stupid and unreal but the rewards are so amazing 😂😂

For high rank accounts they are tend to be picky on what bounty they will join but for low rank account like us, there's no chance we will have a spot on a high paying campaign specially in the bitcoin marketplace.

[iTradeChips]

the first is because of the bad bounty manager, and the second one is choosing the wrong bounty,
that's why many are affected by scammers, I've participated in several bounties and the results were bad,
that's how it is, we as bounty hunters are indeed the risks

We can also assume that the bounty managers were also scammed and they do not know anything about the scam itself until the bounty is over and the payments were never made. But of course we cannot also blame the bounty participants, who wants to earn crypto by working and not investing. I have participated in many bounties, some good ones and others and many others are bad ones. Those that do not pay, or they have paid but you cannot exchange their tokens or coins into fiat currency, and also those who have canceled themselves midway the bounty campaign. Yes, many hard times for the bounty hunters, then if you get scammed that would hurt them much further.

[devollito]

Since there are many people join bounty and they dont understand the rules. They only want quick money by creating shity article and video. The most craziest thing is bounty manager accept those kind of article and video. Check the video they made most of it is reading webaite and whitepapper. I am not surprised if the client wont pay such video and article.

The rules bounty hunter usualy does :
1. Asking about bounty in the project main telegram.
2. Asking when distribution without reading announcemment.
3. Copy and paste article without understanding what the project is about.

[mrongos]

Since there are many people join bounty and they dont understand the rules. They only want quick money by creating shity article and video. The most craziest thing is bounty manager accept those kind of article and video. Check the video they made most of it is reading webaite and whitepapper. I am not surprised if the client wont pay such video and article.

The rules bounty hunter usualy does :
1. Asking about bounty in the project main telegram.
2. Asking when distribution without reading announcemment.
3. Copy and paste article without understanding what the project is about.

By understanding the three points you mentioned, usually they are still doing scams and there is no guarantee that they will definitely pay because they can do whatever they want, the bounty campaign will look good when the developer has given the coin to the bounty campaign manager or escrow with the bounty manager so that the guarantee will paid.

[Sithara007]

The rules bounty hunter usualy does :
1. Asking about bounty in the project main telegram.
2. Asking when distribution without reading announcemment.
3. Copy and paste article without understanding what the project is about.

The other two rules are fine with me, but I am not comfortable with the first rule. If the ICO requires a bounty campaign to promote itself, then it should be made public. If the promoters are hiding this fact from the public, then it is a big red flag for me. Trust is very important in the cryptocurrency sector, because the investors are pouring their hard earned money in to this project even before the development is even 10% complete. Under these circumstances, it will be in bad faith, if the details about the bounty campaign is hidden from them.

[Beparanf]

The majority of bounty hunters simply want to have as many campaigns as possible. They are unsure if the project they are promoting has market potential, especially those in social media bounty. Bounty hunters continue to promote campaigns even if they have been accused of being a scam because they do not conduct research or visit the scam sections. Do your own research and take a look on white paper to prevent from scams.

Yeah, This is the common logic of bounty hunters which is effective for those people who don't know how to research the project. Not all people has the knowledge and comprehension to do there own research that's why joining as much as possible is there best chance to hit a legit campaign.

[Erdogan]

All bounty campaigns involve risk, which is why they are usually much better paid than campaigns paid every week (I think about signature campaigns here). If someone takes part in a bounty campaign, they must agree that the risk that the project will fail or that it is a scam is much greater than in a BTC paid campaign. It is simple - if you do not want to take risks then do not participate in bounty campaigns.

[Vaskiy]

The majority of bounty hunters simply want to have as many campaigns as possible. They are unsure if the project they are promoting has market potential, especially those in social media bounty. Bounty hunters continue to promote campaigns even if they have been accused of being a scam because they do not conduct research or visit the scam sections. Do your own research and take a look on white paper to prevent from scams.

Yeah, This is the common logic of bounty hunters which is effective for those people who don't know how to research the project. Not all people has the knowledge and comprehension to do there own research that's why joining as much as possible is there best chance to hit a legit campaign.

Most of the Bounty hunters have turned successful with the previous bull trend. By that time more ERC 20 projects gave good return. In particular those are days when people aren't much aware of cryptocurrencies. During those days every project bumped high and later went out of usage. Maybe the same scenario could happen again.