Hi tippytoes,
First of all, thank you for your questions.
Before answering let me clarify that this is a community-based project, I'm a community member like everyone else, I just took (like some other members) the initiative to improve Simian Finance.
The contract is ownerless, so no one can alter it or claim ownership which promotes everyone to participate with their own initiatives.
With the revival of this project, do you have full control of the resources needed to move forward its development?
Yes, we have control of the Dev wallet, domain names, and social media.
And how do you select the charity organization that you want to spend your money with?
There was an application process, they were the only candidates.
But we do plan to extend support to other organizations.
As the project grows financially so will the number of supported entities and the formalities to distribute funds.
There are ideas to implement a DAO model for this effect.
Where can we see a certain agreement to the institutions that are holding these apes that you are creating NFTs for them? Like for example, do you have final agreement with International Animal Rescue that you will make an NFT item for Rickina?
I wasn't personally involved in the negotiations, we have assurance by the member who dealt with the communications with Orangutan Outreach that the NFT was discussed and they approved it.
But your point is quite valid, I'll talk about it internally and if necessary will reach out to Orangutan Outreach.
Anyway, they have publicly acknowledged our support in the following tweet:
https://twitter.com/redapes/status/1372625774105260037As a last note,
we welcome everybody, not only people who want to buy the token but also all those who have ideas and want to implement them in the context of the team or on their own.
The beauty is this is an ownerless community-based token, with full liquidity on Uniswap, so
we are all equals.