Legendary trying to enroll 2 Alt Accounts at the same signature campaign

[1miau]

Would such a behaviour (trying to enroll 2 Alt Accounts at the same signature campaign) result in red trust or only a neutral trust for linking Alt Accounts? What's DT's opinion?

My opinion: when in doubt, use neutral feedback:

I think Neutral Feedback is currently undervalued on Bitcointalk. It's a great tool to de-escalate without drastic consequences. Please use it when appropriate.

That was also my current approach, of course also depending on how his reaction will be for exposing his alts / his double application.

Contrary to eddie and his opinions I think I have always had the forums best interest in mind when it comes to campaigns. Moving on to something that happened in 2017, I think time has run out for tagging anyone for something they did back then. If they were tagged back then. then it is fine.

A user can also pm a manager and let them know hey these are all my accounts, give a link to all accounts, and ask if any of them can be accepted. It is not forbidden to have multiple accounts, so it shouldn't result in a tag if done in that way.

So iif I am getting it right, you can never be removed in a campaign or you can join a campaign if you let the manager know about you having an alt account,

I would say that totally depends on each Campaign Manager. For the comment above, yahoo62278 mentioned that before joining a campaign, a user can ask via PM which of his accounts would have the best chance to apply and get accepted. But if everyone starts doing this, the Campaign Manager would have much more work, so don't take it granted to get an advice. If you have that much alt accounts that you don't know which account will have the best chances, it's not the Campaign Manager's problem.

most campaigns though have a rule that says that if an alt was found out then they are removed.

The rule is about only one account per participant or better described as "no multiple accounts allowed to enroll in this signature campaign". Lets say I'm an alt account from LoyceV, and the signature campaign is "shitcoin bets.com", so it's only allowed to enroll 1miau or LoyceV account in "shitcoin bets.com" signature campaign.
It doesn't matter if you enroll your alt or your main account, but it has to be only 1 account for this campaign.

[1715133990]

1715133990

[1715133990]

1715133990

[1715133990]

1715133990

[Obito]

~snip

I would say that totally depends on each Campaign Manager. For the comment above, yahoo62278 mentioned that before joining a campaign, a user can ask via PM which of his accounts would have the best chance to apply and get accepted. But if everyone starts doing this, the Campaign Manager would have much more work, so don't take it granted to get an advice. If you have that much alt accounts that you don't know which account will have the best chances, it's not the Campaign Manager's problem.

That's not my point though, what I am trying to say is that if the manager knows that you have an alt, that means that they can accept you without the worry of being flagged by DT for alt accounts.

[eddie13]

I asked hilariousandco's advice about this very question a year or two ago, and if I recall correctly he told me that regardless of whether it's stated in the campaign rules, enrolling multiple accounts in the same campaign is a tag-able offense. 

Imma PM him for clarification on this opinion..

Contrary to eddie and his opinions I think I have always had the forums best interest in mind when it comes to campaigns.

Running campaigns to advertise blatant yobit scams and hiring spammers in order based on how much they will bump project ANNs and shill the project across the forum any chance they get (against forum rules)..
How scrupulous..

[hilariousandco]

I asked hilariousandco's advice about this very question a year or two ago, and if I recall correctly he told me that regardless of whether it's stated in the campaign rules, enrolling multiple accounts in the same campaign is a tag-able offense.  And as far as I know, it's been a rule in all of Yahoo62278's campaigns and pretty much every other one as well.

I don't believe I said this or you may have misinterpreted what I said. It's 100% not against the forum rules. As far as theymos or the mods are concerned you could have 100 accounts on the same campaign just as long as they're not shitposting en masse. I may have said something along the lines of the community often deems it a tagable offence. Personally I would think it's basically a terms of service violation of the campaign if it states only one person and if people want to tag people for it I wouldn't make an argument against that but I don't believe it's a crime either.

[Hhampuz]

I don't see any reason to tag someone for applying with several alts in one campaign, if it's against the rules of the campaign or not. Just add them to your blacklist if you want or as someone else suggested in this thread - neutral tag, would and probably should be enough.

[1miau]

I asked hilariousandco's advice about this very question a year or two ago, and if I recall correctly he told me that regardless of whether it's stated in the campaign rules, enrolling multiple accounts in the same campaign is a tag-able offense.  And as far as I know, it's been a rule in all of Yahoo62278's campaigns and pretty much every other one as well.

I don't believe I said this or you may have misinterpreted what I said. It's 100% not against the forum rules. As far as theymos or the mods are concerned you could have 100 accounts on the same campaign just as long as they're not shitposting en masse. I may have said something along the lines of the community often deems it a tagable offence. Personally I would think it's basically a terms of service violation of the campaign if it states only one person and if people want to tag people for it I wouldn't make an argument against that but I don't believe it's a crime either.

I think The Pharmacist was also referring to community standards here, not directly to violations of forum rules.
Some might give a red tag, some might not give a red tag because each DT member has a different point of view regarding that issue.

[AB de Royse777]

Just add them to your blacklist if you want or as someone else suggested in this thread - neutral tag, would and probably should be enough.

This seems another reasonable response to me.
Making them blacklisted and not making much talk about it could be a best practice too.

However, in some cases managers mention that enrolling alt will result in negative tag. And after seeing this rule if anyone still enrol more than one account then tagging the account is fair as well.

[FIFA worldcup]

I asked hilariousandco's advice about this very question a year or two ago, and if I recall correctly he told me that regardless of whether it's stated in the campaign rules, enrolling multiple accounts in the same campaign is a tag-able offense.  And as far as I know, it's been a rule in all of Yahoo62278's campaigns and pretty much every other one as well.

I don't believe I said this or you may have misinterpreted what I said. It's 100% not against the forum rules. As far as theymos or the mods are concerned you could have 100 accounts on the same campaign just as long as they're not shitposting en masse. I may have said something along the lines of the community often deems it a tagable offence. Personally I would think it's basically a terms of service violation of the campaign if it states only one person and if people want to tag people for it I wouldn't make an argument against that but I don't believe it's a crime either.

There are some people on the forum who wish every Legendary or Hero member to be tagged and they will not spare any single incident to enforce a red tag    
I don't know about this mentally, maybe its hard to rank Legendary and some low ranked members didn't like old Legendries enjoy the privilege they gained at the time when forum had no merits.