FBI uses bitcoin mixers from forfeiture processing.

[In the silence]

Over the last eight years, U.S. law enforcement has seized a great number of bitcoins and at one time, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) held one of the largest bitcoin wallets after the Silk Road takedown. A recently published report shows the FBI has started using cryptocurrency mixing applications in recent times in order to obfuscate transactions from seized bitcoins that stem from a forfeiture.


Source: https://news.bitcoin.com/report-claims-fbi-bitcoin-mixers-btc-forfeiture-processing/


Why would they do that? Arrested person from doing criminal activities do that, so why do they? 🤣

No transparency is a corrupted system.

[1715398845]

1715398845

[1715398845]

1715398845

[1715398845]

1715398845

[btcsmlcmnr]

The article is from a scam website, BCash. This team try to shill their shit cash and 4 years of efforts only give them failures. The Bitcoin community know what is the real Bitcoin.

About governments and their restrictions on mixers, tumblers are not strange. They want to trace transactions with banks and now try to do same things with their CBDCs.

They have Bitcoin and mixers as they have more challenges to trace money flows. Not only about criminals or money laundering.

[GUIDE] All About Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC)

[In the silence]

The article is from a scam website, BCash. This team try to shill their shit cash and 4 years of efforts only give them failures. The Bitcoin community know what is the real Bitcoin.

About governments and their restrictions on mixers, tumblers are not strange. They want to trace transactions with banks and now try to do same things with their CBDCs.

They have Bitcoin and mixers as they have more challenges to trace money flows. Not only about criminals or money laundering.

[GUIDE] All About Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC)

Thank you for pointing out that it is not the real bitcoin but from the fake one. Still we cannot ignore the fact that FBI are shady agency that confiscate cryptocurrencies and not all of them are being presented as evidences. Heres a merit.

[buwaytress]

Wouldn't be surprised if FBI or anyone in regulations would try to mix coins, since they were the ones questioning fungibility at some point. Not sure anyone cares now at this point. I'd certainly buy tagged coins if they came at a cheaper price. But would be very surprised if they used any of the "commercial" ones that suffer from a chronological path shortcoming that would be easier to breakdown in tracing.

[thesmallgod]

It is strange to see them making use of services that have been due illegal. Probably they are also making sure they destroy evidence get tracked. It is just like you do not believe in a process but you are making use of the process. For you, it is right but for other it is not. This exactly the reason why many do not like a centralized system of governance. You are only right in your own way.

[avikz]

Lol! It's really wired for an organization like FBI to use cryptocurrency mixing services. Either they are trying to understand how the mixers work to prepare a plan of action against them or they are just trying to make their wallet more secure by covering the trail of money! W

But I don't think any serious outcome will happen and also I see no resolution to believe such articles because the authors often use clickbait articles to increase the number of their visitors.

[izsara]

I was very surprised by the huge amount of bitcoin holding in the wallet, whether it would be a trigger if in the end bitcoins were not evenly distributed, because of the detention from the FBI.
while the supply decreases, making the amount of bitcoins in the wallet non-tradable.

[o_e_l_e_o]

For years governments and associated agencies have relied on the big central banks to launder billions or even trillions of dollars for them, and in return they turn a blind eye to all the other illegal stuff the banks are doing and profiting from. But there is no centralized authority in bitcoin that they can wrap round their finger. They have to play by the rules, same as everybody else. I wouldn't be surprised in the least if the FBI and other government agencies are regularly using mixers to obfuscate their bitcoin dealings.

However, as pointed out above, this story is from a scam website and is poorly written. At least they corrected the article when they were called out on it - note the correction at the bottom. The address they claim shows "tell-tale signs of a bitcoin mixer" actually belongs to an exchange.

[doc110240]

I lost bitcoins when btc-e was shut down by the FBI and, as I had done nothing wrong and they wrongly confiscated my stuff, I submitted a claim form on their website. I haven’t heard back yet though. AFAIK the FBI have a few hundred thousand dollars of my coins, we just had a child so my family could really use the money right now. I hope that I’m just part of a really long line of public requests to the FBI and that they will eventually get back to me with my stuff. Has anyone else gotten their coins back from the FBI?

[lionheart78]

Why would they do that? Arrested person from doing criminal activities do that, so why do they? 🤣

One simple answer, they wanted to pocket the confiscated BTC.  On the brighter side, I guess they wanted to wash out the history of that BTC, probably they think it as a new start  .

No transparency is a corrupted system.

Some part of the government system had been rotten ever since.  No government can claim that they aren't corrupt or whatsoever especially the financial institution.

[DarkDays]

Wouldn't be surprised if FBI or anyone in regulations would try to mix coins, since they were the ones questioning fungibility at some point. Not sure anyone cares now at this point.

I agree, I wouldn't be much surprised even if FBI federals were taking part in such a shady activity. At the end of the day, the tracing is not as visible as with fiat but it does make you question things.


Talking about raising an eyebrow - the source isn't the most legit one either, so the views here are for the argument sake only.

I'd certainly buy tagged coins if they came at a cheaper price. But would be very surprised if they used any of the "commercial" ones that suffer from a chronological path shortcoming that would be easier to breakdown in tracing.

On the other hand, getting rid of these tagged tokens wouldn't be much of an issue since many people would for sure queue up for BTC specially given its latest rally.

[DoublerHunter]

^ That is right and the BTC mixer is probably a washing machine. I have been thinking of valid reasons the FBI uses this service. Transparency-wise, they lose. But for me, this is not new and probably most Americans are not surprised, even when fiat was the main thing, these people did what they did and the process still goes. Do they think that people are the same as dumb as before? No way, we have evolved and probably transparency is the best thing they can give especially they are public servants. I hope this one will have a good resolve.

[Lorence.xD]

I think the reason for that mixing is that they are auctioning those bitcoins at a lower price as far as I know, I think there were some prominent people that participated in the auction back then.

[Woodie]

Why would they mix the coins in the first place? Is someone from the FBI trying to keep some of the coins to themselves with the split transaction feature that comes with most of the mixers....

I think the reason for that mixing is that they are auctioning those bitcoins at a lower price as far as I know, I think there were some prominent people that participated in the auction back then.

Clean to auction sounds like a good reason but those forfeited coins going for a cheaper price I don't think so , should be sold at market value.

[Lorence.xD]

~

Clean to auction sounds like a good reason but those forfeited coins going for a cheaper price I don't think so , should be sold at market value.

That's what happened to the bitcoin that was seized in the Silkroad, I don't know if that is still the case to this day because most of the time evidence that are seized and auctioned are cheper since they have the crimes associated with it.

[Wexnident]

That's odd, wasn't there some info on how confiscated Bitcoin was auctioned by the government so that they can be labeled as "clean" again? Idk what the purpose of them mixing their coins in the mixer then. I also hardly doubt that even with mixers, the FBI (or any central organization) would get away with stealing publicly claimed confiscated coins since the blockchain is completely transparent. It'd be rather easy for them to be traced, and just like this, could easily be blamed for them trying to steal the coins confiscated.

It's rather understandable for the government to steal billions via fiat since that's been happening forever, but with crypto and its transparency? Doubt that. They hate anything that can be traced publicly with a passion since that basically restricts them.

[electronicash]

That's odd, wasn't there some info on how confiscated Bitcoin was auctioned by the government so that they can be labeled as "clean" again? Idk what the purpose of them mixing their coins in the mixer then. I also hardly doubt that even with mixers, the FBI (or any central organization) would get away with stealing publicly claimed confiscated coins since the blockchain is completely transparent. It'd be rather easy for them to be traced, and just like this, could easily be blamed for them trying to steal the coins confiscated.

It's rather understandable for the government to steal billions via fiat since that's been happening forever, but with crypto and its transparency? Doubt that. They hate anything that can be traced publicly with a passion since that basically restricts them.

we don't know how dumb they could be. the agents who stole some BTC from the seized Silk Road stash actually were caught for sending it directly to an exchange. that could be sort of a lesson for them and i guess they'd be cautious from then on. if they have read online that mixers are available to avoid getting traced, they will try mixing it. but then this article is from bcash shill.

[buwaytress]

Talking about raising an eyebrow - the source isn't the most legit one either, so the views here are for the argument sake only.

Aye, they're a bit better than the general lot, and if it's informed sources being used, then I'm okay to take it at face value, just perhaps there's a lot more to the story than is being let on. Pretty sure FBI/CIA/whomever will have experimented plenty with mixers already to know enough, though so not discounting they'd consider using it.

On the other hand, getting rid of these tagged tokens wouldn't be much of an issue since many people would for sure queue up for BTC specially given its latest rally.

Fungibility at its finest.

[jackg]

When determining the security of a technology that has already made it into mainstream media, USE MAINSTREAM MEDIA TO DETERMINE HOW SECURE IT IS, OFFICIAL GIT ISSUES, OR VERIFIABLE ALGORITHMIC PROOF.

Using a random news source to find out how transactions can be "forfeited" isn't a great idea especially when it mentions transactions being forfeited.

I'm pretty sure a lot of sites like BBC news were reporting on the chain attacks in 2015 -  rely on those when measuring SECURITY of a new innovative tool.

If the FBI has an idea of something HALF OF THE senior ATTACKERS HAVE ALREADY DONE IT.

[ilovealtcoins]

Bitcoin is a currency, a digital asset. The seizure of Bitcoin caused by crime needs to be turned into the property and included in the national budget. In this case, it is legal to use a mixer to make money illegally. No one has an opinion on this issue because it benefits the national budget.