(⊙.⊙(☉̃ₒ☉)⊙.⊙)【Lateplays】ZERO HOUSE EDGE Bitcoin/Litecoin GAMING (⊙.⊙(☉̃ₒ☉)⊙.⊙)

[mintybreath]

Lateplays.com
100% RTP • Provably Fair • Licensed

Lateplays is super fun and super simple. Players post bets, and other players accept those bets as HEADS or TAILS to win any amount of Bitcoin or Litecoin.

Lateplays has zero house edge and no rake on winnings. Seriously, right now you can switch to playing with 100% RTP.

To get the ball rolling, we'll deposit a FREE 0.00008000 BTC to the first ten members who sign up and message me their username! (100+ merit users only to prevent spam)

EDIT: Thanks for all the replies. We are working on a new version of Lateplays and will be posting a new thread, therefor I am locking this topic.

[1715507646]

1715507646

[1715507646]

1715507646

[1715507646]

1715507646

[1715507646]

1715507646

[mintybreath]

FAQ

Q: How do you make money?

A: We don't at the moment. In the future we'll add more conventional games, but we'll always have the direct player vs player option.

[Lanatsa]

Is this mandatory? IF yes then don't expect you would be getting some users on here.As if this had been highlighted on the site which im curious if
its really that needed.

Bonus amount is really tempting since its $5 on the current bitcoin price. When it comes to withdrawals then this one had static or dynamic fees?

[mintybreath]

https://i.imgur.com/MTDbz0j.png

Is this mandatory? IF yes then don't expect you would be getting some users on here.As if this had been highlighted on the site which im curious if
its really that needed.

Bonus amount is really tempting since its $5 on the current bitcoin price. When it comes to withdrawals then this one had static or dynamic fees?

Thanks for your question. That is NOT mandatory! We only reserve the right to request KYC information in the case of extreme or suspicious activity, in compliance with our licenser.

Withdrawal fees are dynamic, currently set to target confirmation within 48 blocks for Bitcoin. This resulted in a fee of 0.00005638 BTC on one recent withdrawal. Withdrawals are instant.

[stomachgrowls]

FAQ

Q: How do you make money?

A: We don't at the moment. In the future we'll add more conventional games, but we'll always have the direct player vs player option.

Can you add out some trading like game like this concept https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t1sqV5Mx56k which can be considered to be PvP too.Its good to see some no house edge

gambling site but it would be better for you to charge or make this one temporary because sustaining wont be possible. Maintaining a gambling site does have its own expenses for you to pay on.

In talks of website design then this one is simple and does need more some colors but its understandable though because this is just some start up
but it would be better if you do start on having good impressions on that area.

[acroman08]

Welcome to the forum!

regarding your Terms and Condition, 4.1.3 is it possible to include the list name of the territories of the countries? I am asking because there are people that might misinterpret it in the future. also, I agree with stomachgrowls, besides the license, website design is a huge part of attracting gamblers. also, a good announcement thread contributes to attracting players to a gambling site.

[yahoo62278]

Player vs player heads and tails has been tried on a couple platforms. I cannot recall which ones except bitdouble.io and it wasn't super popular. Try to come up with a game that noone else and give yourself the best chance for success.

[DoublerHunter]

^ Above is right, I have been here for years, and as I noticed player vs player gambling platforms did not long last. Probably because gamblers did not have the same time to gamble or probably only less are interested. But I won't judge early and I hope this will succeed soon, just listen to their advice, and probably it will increase to lure gamblers in the future. Promotion here is the best way to have players and probably you will across such a decision in the future. Nevertheless, I saw that site and it looks like needs improvement and while you did not generate profit yet from your gambling site it is expecting that you need to prepare a fund for that, for a dev team.

[romero121]

Player vs player concept is successful, because of the zero edge. Here you need good traffic and this can't be achieved through this game. You could've tried this with Dice. If not you could've done with some games like chess that are much of a skill based one. Both the players bet against each and the winner takes the opponents bet providing a fee to the platform as edge.

[Kittygalore]

Player vs player concept is successful, because of the zero edge. Here you need good traffic and this can't be achieved through this game. You could've tried this with Dice. If not you could've done with some games like chess that are much of a skill based one. Both the players bet against each and the winner takes the opponents bet providing a fee to the platform as edge.

I would agree, I would probably profit from this by taking a small chunk of the pot money in every game like around .5% of the pot, or if that looks bad maybe some sort of ads or increase traffic. The only problem with PVP gambling is that there is only a few games that are established, I would love some innovations.

[mintybreath]

Thank you for all the responses and feedback! We are indeed working on an instant Dice game with a competative but above zero house edge. Ideally this can bring players while the PvP games are slow, as well as fund some advertising. As for the design, it's a work in progress

[rodskee]

Is this mandatory? IF yes then don't expect you would be getting some users on here.As if this had been highlighted on the site which im curious if
its really that needed.

Bonus amount is really tempting since its $5 on the current bitcoin price. When it comes to withdrawals then this one had static or dynamic fees?

well it is clearly mentioned that "At Any Time" meaning depend on the situation or depend in the activity of the player if questionable .

But sad to say , This was being used by Many gambling site to abuse the players, They can easily put cases to Specific player and then ask for KYC and some issues here in forum Like what Had FortuneJack recently that the questioned Player denied to submit KYC as he is not a fan of exposing His identity in gambling platform so in the end, FJ totally denied His case and now i guess it's over but i use it as example for everyone to know that in any chances they can be experiencing that same.

[nakamura12]

It woukd be nice to have more game that players can choose to play whatever they like. This is another site that doesn't have house edge that I notice this time. I couldn't recall it clearly but as what I know about the other site is they only ask for donations. I don't like having to provide KYC details since at any time the team could ask you to undergo a KYC. This might be a problem to some even if they didn't do something but still asked for KYC.

[sujonali1819]

well, Very simple site with very simple games. You should maybe add some other games too. Only one game sometime people feel boring IMO.

People are talking about kyc system. Though they already said it's not mandatory, I don't like how they represent this on the account info>verification.

[BrewMaster]

well it is clearly mentioned that "At Any Time" meaning depend on the situation or depend in the activity of the player if questionable .

But sad to say , This was being used by Many gambling site to abuse the players, They can easily put cases to Specific player and then ask for KYC and some issues here in forum Like what Had FortuneJack recently that the questioned Player denied to submit KYC as he is not a fan of exposing His identity in gambling platform so in the end, FJ totally denied His case and now i guess it's over but i use it as example for everyone to know that in any chances they can be experiencing that same.

this is a big problem though and not just with gambling sites but a lot of other centralized services, usually exchanges. when there is a clause in the terms of services of a company that reserves the right to restrict the user and invade their anonymity then there is always a risk for all users who want to keep their privacy to join that platform.

[Mahanton]

Player vs player heads and tails has been tried on a couple platforms. I cannot recall which ones except bitdouble.io and it wasn't super popular. Try to come up with a game that noone else and give yourself the best chance for success.

Take this piece of advise because basing off with real user experience here on this market then its true that pvp type games arent really getting that attention on this place.
People do majority do much prefer on playing those typical dice games and slots rather than on dealing with pvp which results are way too long if someone doesnt join
to compete with you and thats one of the cons of these game.No matter how fair it is but interest isnt really something in level with those boring games like dice and slots.

[panjul07]

People are talking about kyc system. Though they already said it's not mandatory, I don't like how they represent this on the account info>verification.

PVP games itself is not a popular type of game in this gambling industry so it is hard challenge for every casino owner to manage pvp based gambling games.
KYC on other side, will make this type of game get less interest because it is just a heads and tails game which is not a popular game as well.
Zero house edge sounds attractive but it will be useless because people wont be interested to play non popular games plus the possibility of KYC.

[imstillthebest]

PVP games itself is not a popular type of game in this gambling industry so it is hard challenge for every casino owner to manage pvp based gambling games.
it is just a heads and tails game which is not a popular game as well.
Zero house edge sounds attractive but it will be useless because people wont be interested to play non popular games

never heard of this heads and tails game but is this the same in a coin toss game ? because in that game you will be asked if heads or tails .
the concept is easy but verry exciting  and why it wont get popular ?
 they never know if they wont try .
the amount of pvp games produced are small in the gambling industry but if they can produce more of this , they can compete with non pvp games in the future

[sujonali1819]

PVP games itself is not a popular type of game in this gambling industry so it is hard challenge for every casino owner to manage pvp based gambling games.

Exactly, I saw here in this gambling section there are some project with pvp game created announcement thread. After few days it's seem they are not active here or on the site. That means people are not interested in it and without player pvp game can not be run long. Atleast need an opposite to play the game. And it's also hard to collect.

[nakamura12]

PVP games itself is not a popular type of game in this gambling industry so it is hard challenge for every casino owner to manage pvp based gambling games.

Exactly, I saw here in this gambling section there are some project with pvp game created announcement thread. After few days it's seem they are not active here or on the site. That means people are not interested in it and without player pvp game can not be run long. Atleast need an opposite to play the game. And it's also hard to collect.

I'm not sure how many times I come across an announcement thread about a site that have pvp games still active on the thread. There might be some people interested in pvp games like me but in my side I am not that much interested but I love the thrill of playing against other people. The reason maybe that there is not enough people interested in gambling pvp but I do saw many people play pvp for fun instead of gambling. You are right that it won't run long term.