Sick of Martingale? Give this a shot... It works. Chart and Instructions.

[rollburst.com]

it doesnt work brother. it ends up in loss

[1714849097]

1714849097

[1714849097]

1714849097

[1714849097]

1714849097

[1714849097]

1714849097

[1714849097]

1714849097

[earnadoge]

I charted this in excel, was a little tricky, but was able to do it.  Nothing amazing happened on the charts, that i would find useful for session play.  The concept is not new, there are quite a few types of number lines with parlay in them, 31 parlay is one of them, you bet like a sequence that totals 31 and parlay the win ones and restart.  There are other number lines where you keep on going till two wins, and if back and forth happens on bigger bets, there is a limit, and than restarts.  Some famous casino grinders use and swear by them, and are usually found in books not websites.  The way pros play them is not the same way we play them I think, they grind with black chips and massive banks and often one unit win can be enough to live for a day.  This goes for all systems, including the STAR system.  When I try these systems I hit my consecutive numbers in the low ranges and than it flies through all the big bets without double hits, and thats that.  When I played this system manualy, not on charts, it was fun, it jumped a bit up and down, and I stopped with a small win.  I recommend playing everything progressive, or everything in reverse, and only manual.  It also become like chess if you're in it for the long run and have enough betting units, since using progressive system will produce overall more profit, but most of it is hard to capture, since you loose it if not cashed out, reset.  Also profits attained this way are very slow and inconsistent, and doesn't satisfy the appetite of those who want to make good money gambling.  Martingale is an excellent system, but each session needs to have a stop loss, that way if one day you get 4x on your session, next day you only loose one session on bad string of losses, not everything.  Of course they can and will happen in a row too.  Also system analysis/charting/coding varies strategies is very good because it develops other skills, programming, charting software, etc.

[teucor]

Wrote a script to simulate this - always a loss with any house edge. It does end up wagering a decent amount of BTC compared to the loss, but a loss non the less.

Code:

House Edge: 0.05
Base Bet: 0.00001000
Number of Rolls: 100000
Total BTC: -0.43114500
Total BTC Wagered: 8.03352000

House Edge: 0.01
Base Bet: 0.00001000
Number of Rolls: 100000
Total BTC: -0.05487440
Total BTC Wagered: 7.97234000

House Edge: 0.00
Base Bet: 0.00001000
Number of Rolls: 100000
Total BTC: 0.02358000
Total BTC Wagered: 7.96112000

Below is the python code - the roll method is pretty straightforward

Code:

def hey_you_guys_sim(num_sims, bet_type, multiplier = 0.5, house_edge = 0.01):
    base_bet = 0.00001000
    start_bet = base_bet
    bet = base_bet
    total = 0
    total_bet = 0
    cur_round = 1
    num_wins = 0

    for i in range(num_sims):

        if cur_round == 31 or num_wins == 3:
            bet = base_bet
            start_bet = base_bet
            cur_round = 1
            num_wins = 0

        results = roll(bet, multiplier, bet_type, house_edge)
        total -= bet
        total_bet += bet

        if results[0] == True:
            total += results[1]

            print('W: {:1.8f}'.format(bet))
            bet = bet * 2.0
            start_bet = start_bet * 2.0
            num_wins += 1
        else:
            print('L: {:1.8f}'.format(bet))
            bet = bet + start_bet

        cur_round += 1

    print('House Edge: {:1.2f}'.format(house_edge))
    print('Base Bet: {:1.8f}'.format(base_bet))
    print('Number of Rolls: {}'.format(num_sims))
    print('Total BTC: {:1.8f}'.format(total))
    print('Total BTC Wagered: {:1.8f}'.format(total_bet))

[HYIPMilker]

I've tested this strategy. If you win more than you lose, you'll be in good profit compared to other strategies.

If you lose more than you win, no strategy will save you. (except martingale if you have unlimited bankroll)

You might win more than you lose in short term, vice versa. In my simulations you need at least 1,000 bets to almost equalize win/loss ratio.

[dany1980]

Hi,
Martingale is always losing strategy,
even if you wait before play.

You can test it here where you can crash any strategy you want with a million bets in 0.5 seconds:
https://www.bitso.me/hi-lo-calc.php

On top, use strategy=1, down set "min losses" at 1, set the margin you prefer, then in "tot rolls" set 1000000