Deleted

[afong]

Deleted

[BTCITA187]

There are +100500 dogs tokens already on Uniswap -))

[nimogsm]

I understand that this is an experimental coin, but why is it needed? There are already, as far as I know, Doge on the Ethereum network, why do we need another one?How to convince users to buy this particular token and for what purposes?

[shinratensei_]

I understand that this is an experimental coin, but why is it needed? There are already, as far as I know, Doge on the Ethereum network, why do we need another one?How to convince users to buy this particular token and for what purposes?

It could be another money grabber maybe, there are a bunch of scammers who have been using this opportunity to create more and more shitscam coins, and then they will be rugpulling the investor's fund.
If we can buy real doge coin and why do we need to buy garbage coin like this one? I smell something fishy with this garbage coin.

The purpose of shit scam token to be a money grabber for the creator.

[malchaska]

So basically Dogee is an experimental and decentralized currency which can be used as payment method. But will it has more options for usage later?

[veivodea]

If Dogee was created to further enhance the innovation going in the Ethereum blockchain, what innovative it can give us?

[Miiike]

I understand that this is an experimental coin, but why is it needed? There are already, as far as I know, Doge on the Ethereum network, why do we need another one?How to convince users to buy this particular token and for what purposes?

It could be another money grabber maybe, there are a bunch of scammers who have been using this opportunity to create more and more shitscam coins, and then they will be rugpulling the investor's fund.
If we can buy real doge coin and why do we need to buy garbage coin like this one? I smell something fishy with this garbage coin.

The purpose of shit scam token to be a money grabber for the creator.

Judging from the dev's account itself was resurrected from nearly four years of inactivity and how un-innovative this project is? Yes, it is a hit-or-miss attempt to grab easy money.

Just look at their tokenomy, they specifically state theh have the key to "dev fund" and has the right to use it. For what? We don't know.

[tippytoes]

I understand that this is an experimental coin, but why is it needed? There are already, as far as I know, Doge on the Ethereum network, why do we need another one?How to convince users to buy this particular token and for what purposes?

It could be another money grabber maybe, there are a bunch of scammers who have been using this opportunity to create more and more shitscam coins, and then they will be rugpulling the investor's fund.
If we can buy real doge coin and why do we need to buy garbage coin like this one? I smell something fishy with this garbage coin.

The purpose of shit scam token to be a money grabber for the creator.

Judging from the dev's account itself was resurrected from nearly four years of inactivity and how un-innovative this project is? Yes, it is a hit-or-miss attempt to grab easy money.

Just look at their tokenomy, they specifically state theh have the key to "dev fund" and has the right to use it. For what? We don't know.

Maybe, another project trying to ride the hype surrounding doge coin. I would suggest for potential buyers to think hard before buying this token. My impression is that this will be a short-lived project. Once the people behind it got their money, even if it is not that much, they will abandon this project. The proof of liquidity locked is not enough to assure potential buyers that this one will not disappear anytime they want.

[Kazkar]

As far as I understand, someone made a bet on this coin. Since not everyone will figure it out, Elon Mast advertised this or another coin on his Twitter))

[Miiike]

As far as I understand, someone made a bet on this coin. Since not everyone will figure it out, Elon Mast advertised this or another coin on his Twitter))

Read carefully, this project is dogee, with double E, birthed just matter of days ago, not the original doge memetoken from years ago. As someone with quite a rank, you should be able to know differences between projects and at least basic knowledge about doge, it has tons of pages from years of its journey, not mere pages like this. That fact enough should be able to tell you this is a different project.

[mandor]

Token Address: https://etherscan.io/token/0x4967Eaf73bA468Ff0c0Aa70DaD6f1cDe08430370

Tokenomics
1000 trillion of token was minted at launch. This is the max supply of the token. Half of supply is locked indefinitely in Uniswap liquidity pool. No one can remove the pool at any time. The other half was sent to Vitalik Buterin address. This will have a burning effect on the total supply.

The idea pretty same with AKITA i think, 50% lock and another 50% send to VB. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5313752.0
because of the rapid development of the token price, it's not wrong, more and more are popping up in search of a common fate.

[Miiike]

Token Address: https://etherscan.io/token/0x4967Eaf73bA468Ff0c0Aa70DaD6f1cDe08430370

Tokenomics
1000 trillion of token was minted at launch. This is the max supply of the token. Half of supply is locked indefinitely in Uniswap liquidity pool. No one can remove the pool at any time. The other half was sent to Vitalik Buterin address. This will have a burning effect on the total supply.

The idea pretty same with AKITA i think, 50% lock and another 50% send to VB. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5313752.0
because of the rapid development of the token price, it's not wrong, more and more are popping up in search of a common fate.

I think it's more to an attempt of exact copy rather than bearing similarities, this dev tried to mimic AKITA's tokenomy. If I'm not mistaken, akita itself was imitating shiba or inu something like that, aren't they?

One thing that brought to my attention is how their tokenomy shows how incompetent they are, or perhaps qe should better say "a scam attempt without clear planning".

Dev, explain this:

You have 100 billions total supply, and 50% of it was sent to VB and the other 50% was locked forever on uniswap LP. So where exactly do the dev got their 5% dev fund from? You have 105% total supply?

[afong]

Token Address: https://etherscan.io/token/0x4967Eaf73bA468Ff0c0Aa70DaD6f1cDe08430370

Tokenomics
1000 trillion of token was minted at launch. This is the max supply of the token. Half of supply is locked indefinitely in Uniswap liquidity pool. No one can remove the pool at any time. The other half was sent to Vitalik Buterin address. This will have a burning effect on the total supply.

The idea pretty same with AKITA i think, 50% lock and another 50% send to VB. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5313752.0
because of the rapid development of the token price, it's not wrong, more and more are popping up in search of a common fate.

I think it's more to an attempt of exact copy rather than bearing similarities, this dev tried to mimic AKITA's tokenomy. If I'm not mistaken, akita itself was imitating shiba or inu something like that, aren't they?

One thing that brought to my attention is how their tokenomy shows how incompetent they are, or perhaps qe should better say "a scam attempt without clear planning".

Dev, explain this:

You have 100 billions total supply, and 50% of it was sent to VB and the other 50% was locked forever on uniswap LP. So where exactly do the dev got their 5% dev fund from? You have 105% total supply?

It was purchased in uniswap after the tokens are locked. This is to prevent whales buying all the tokens and dump on early users.

Get in early while it is still cheap.

[Miiike]

Token Address: https://etherscan.io/token/0x4967Eaf73bA468Ff0c0Aa70DaD6f1cDe08430370

Tokenomics
1000 trillion of token was minted at launch. This is the max supply of the token. Half of supply is locked indefinitely in Uniswap liquidity pool. No one can remove the pool at any time. The other half was sent to Vitalik Buterin address. This will have a burning effect on the total supply.

The idea pretty same with AKITA i think, 50% lock and another 50% send to VB. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5313752.0
because of the rapid development of the token price, it's not wrong, more and more are popping up in search of a common fate.

I think it's more to an attempt of exact copy rather than bearing similarities, this dev tried to mimic AKITA's tokenomy. If I'm not mistaken, akita itself was imitating shiba or inu something like that, aren't they?

One thing that brought to my attention is how their tokenomy shows how incompetent they are, or perhaps qe should better say "a scam attempt without clear planning".

Dev, explain this:

You have 100 billions total supply, and 50% of it was sent to VB and the other 50% was locked forever on uniswap LP. So where exactly do the dev got their 5% dev fund from? You have 105% total supply?

It was purchased in uniswap after the tokens are locked. This is to prevent whales buying all the tokens and dump on early users.

Get in early while it is still cheap.

How? With your own funds? Wasn't the scenario goes like this: right after TGE, 50% of total supply was sent to VB, and the other 50% to LP, so the project themselves didn't have any fund to do a "buyback" for their 5% since there were no presale or other crowdfunding event.

[afong]

Exactly. Anything in dev fund is purchased with own money and contributed by goodwill for the community. No portion of supply is reserved for it.

[Miiike]

Exactly. Anything in dev fund is purchased with own money and contributed by goodwill for the community. No portion of supply is reserved for it.

Well, if that's the case, then I stand corrected and it is indeed fair and acceptable (in a sense) that dev are allowed to do whatever they pleases with the fund, since it came from their very own pocket. I saw that uniswap supply is also already bought and held by several holders. Although I can't be sure if they're early adopters or dev team themselves holding for profit with their own money, I still hope all of those holders got a nice selling price in the future.

[kokrokok]

still little unsure about this project and still need more research, ok I will start monitoring this thread as i personally smell something here, but I saw on telegram it only has 8 members

[afong]

Members will grow with time.

[Miiike]

Members will grow with time.

Well, I should disagree with this statement. For a prestigious and well known projects, yes the statement is true. Project with well established names will attract members by itself. But for  PnD project like yours (let's admit it, this is the true nature of your project) you need to create a hype, and usually it came in form of fake demand and baseless pump (I'll let it be known here that I'm not supporting this kind of project nature)