🤜 GamblingBro.com 🤛 Honest crypto casino reviews ✅ Tested with real deposits ✅

[GamblingBro]

I'm sure with the many accusations here and bad feedbacks it will be classified as a scam casino, GamblingBro.com's reputation will be in a bad light if he classified 1XBIT as a site worthy to deposit to play or better ignore this request they don't deserve to be added in a reputable casino, gambling is risky evermore risky if you play in 1XBIT.

I do not know where you have such conclusions from? After all, I am not asking him to do a positive review, but the honest one.
Everyone has the right to present own opinion. My poin of view is that most of the reviews about 1xBit come from people who violated the rules and were caught doing it, or from people who have not even visited the 1xBit platform. So let's let a professional do it.

The situation with 1xBit, Bitstarz, and some other brands that have negative trust here on bitcointalk is a bit difficult. Before making a review of any of those casinos I will have to go through all the open scam accusations against these brands. After analyzing all the cases I will need to decide, whether the casino in question is breaking the T&C and can be considered as a scam or not. If it will appear to be a scam, then I would write a detailed explanation describing my point of view, instead of a review. If those accusations are the result of some miscommunication or another reason, then there is a chance that the casino will be reviewed.

As you understand this approach will require a lot of research and will take a lot of time, so those problematic brands are located at the very end of my to-do list.

[1714670121]

1714670121

[1714670121]

1714670121

[1714670121]

1714670121

[1714670121]

1714670121

[1714670121]

1714670121

[Mahanton]

I'm sure with the many accusations here and bad feedbacks it will be classified as a scam casino, GamblingBro.com's reputation will be in a bad light if he classified 1XBIT as a site worthy to deposit to play or better ignore this request they don't deserve to be added in a reputable casino, gambling is risky evermore risky if you play in 1XBIT.

I do not know where you have such conclusions from? After all, I am not asking him to do a positive review, but the honest one.
Everyone has the right to present own opinion. My poin of view is that most of the reviews about 1xBit come from people who violated the rules and were caught doing it, or from people who have not even visited the 1xBit platform. So let's let a professional do it.

The situation with 1xBit, Bitstarz, and some other brands that have negative trust here on bitcointalk is a bit difficult. Before making a review of any of those casinos I will have to go through all the open scam accusations against these brands. After analyzing all the cases I will need to decide, whether the casino in question is breaking the T&C and can be considered as a scam or not. If it will appear to be a scam, then I would write a detailed explanation describing my point of view, instead of a review. If those accusations are the result of some miscommunication or another reason, then there is a chance that the casino will be reviewed.

As you understand this approach will require a lot of research and will take a lot of time, so those problematic brands are located at the very end of my to-do list.

Having real experience before making a review is really a good move but if you do base up on countless complaints and issues of those sites
mentioned above then you could really say that it is indeed true but well its your choice since this is your way of verifying things
but in overall then it is just common sense that you would really make out some finalization once you had read up all of those
words that came from the community.

[Saisher]

I'm sure with the many accusations here and bad feedbacks it will be classified as a scam casino, GamblingBro.com's reputation will be in a bad light if he classified 1XBIT as a site worthy to deposit to play or better ignore this request they don't deserve to be added in a reputable casino, gambling is risky evermore risky if you play in 1XBIT.

I do not know where you have such conclusions from? After all, I am not asking him to do a positive review, but the honest one.
Everyone has the right to present own opinion. My poin of view is that most of the reviews about 1xBit come from people who violated the rules and were caught doing it, or from people who have not even visited the 1xBit platform. So let's let a professional do it.

The situation with 1xBit, Bitstarz, and some other brands that have negative trust here on bitcointalk is a bit difficult. Before making a review of any of those casinos I will have to go through all the open scam accusations against these brands. After analyzing all the cases I will need to decide, whether the casino in question is breaking the T&C and can be considered as a scam or not. If it will appear to be a scam, then I would write a detailed explanation describing my point of view, instead of a review. If those accusations are the result of some miscommunication or another reason, then there is a chance that the casino will be reviewed.

As you understand this approach will require a lot of research and will take a lot of time, so those problematic brands are located at the very end of my to-do list.

Having real experience before making a review is really a good move but if you do base up on countless complaints and issues of those sites
mentioned above then you could really say that it is indeed true but well its your choice since this is your way of verifying things
but in overall then it is just common sense that you would really make out some finalization once you had read up all of those
words that came from the community.

Of course, if 1XBIT find out that you are going to make a review and they find out your account there they will not give you an issue at all, they are randomly scamming people, there's a risk in gambling but the risk doubled when you play on casinos like 1XBIT, there were and still existing scam reports and it's not stopping every week there are new ones.

[Peanutswar]

This is a good thing you are bringing insight to the people regarding the different gambling platforms. Also i visited the website and the review you can make a video too as a suggestion so they can explore and not getting afraid what they click on the platform, in some cases still there are people scared to click on the internet so they can aware how to navigate too just my sent.

[GamblingBro]

Crypto.games review is published!

Check out my latest Crypto.games review. This casino has received a 3.5 out of 5 rating from me. This is a reputable brand, but unfortunately with a small game choice.


Check out the review here

[Lanatsa]

Crypto.games review is published!

Seems low which I do believe that it should be a bit higher but well its your personal review and I do respect it.
When it comes to promotions or offers then you should checked out these links.

https://forum.crypto.games/promotions/
https://forum.crypto.games/forum/5-daily-promotions/

I could say that they are good on this one.

[24Kt]

Crypto.games review is published!

Seems low which I do believe that it should be a bit higher but well its your personal review and I do respect it.
When it comes to promotions or offers then you should checked out these links.

https://forum.crypto.games/promotions/
https://forum.crypto.games/forum/5-daily-promotions/

I could say that they are good on this one.

I think, gamblingbro has pretty high standard because the casino with highest rating here has only 3.7 rating. So getting the 3.5, is already like you belong in the top casinos that you can find. Anyway, it is good that at least he is giving his own personal experience and not just copy cat from others' reviews. This is a comprehensive review that you can find based on my opinion. Of course, we can always verify such review by testing the site also. Because some of us will have a different experience and we can be satisfied by small things.

[NobFox]

Really nicely written reviews and I enjoyed how thorough you were with each area of the sites.

Good job.

[Lanatsa]

Crypto.games review is published!

~

I think, gamblingbro has pretty high standard because the casino with highest rating here has only 3.7 rating. So getting the 3.5, is already like you belong in the top casinos that you can find. Anyway, it is good that at least he is giving his own personal experience and not just copy cat from others' reviews. This is a comprehensive review that you can find based on my opinion. Of course, we can always verify such review by testing the site also. Because some of us will have a different experience and we can be satisfied by small things.

You are definitely right on this one but it cant really be just avoided that you wouldn't really make any reactions if you do know that the certain site that had been reviewed should really be having much higher rating.

Well, we do really have  that personal review and since its his site then its up to him whatever things he would be putting into,

For sure there would be several people who would really be going against with this review or rating. 

[Haunebu]

Crypto.games review is published!

Check out my latest Crypto.games review. This casino has received a 3.5 out of 5 rating from me. This is a reputable brand, but unfortunately with a small game choice.


Check out the review here

I agree with most of your points, but I disagree with some parts like games availability and promotions. Crypto.Games provides some of the most popular gambling games with low house edge.

It is true that games by 3rd party providers are missing, but the minority actually play them. Also, there are regular promotions offered on their forum(https://forum.crypto.games/). Another pro is their super fast rolls in Dice.

[panjul07]

Crypto.games review is published!

Seems low which I do believe that it should be a bit higher but well its your personal review and I do respect it.
When it comes to promotions or offers then you should checked out these links.

Do not expect to see high score, most of the reviewed casinos by GamblingBro get an average 3.5 out of 5.
GamblingBro has their own criteria to decide the score as they wish based on some aspects.
Because the score comes from personal opinion so we cant influence them as we have different preferences about each scoring category.

[GamblingBro]

Crypto.games review is published!

Seems low which I do believe that it should be a bit higher but well its your personal review and I do respect it.
When it comes to promotions or offers then you should checked out these links.

https://forum.crypto.games/promotions/
https://forum.crypto.games/forum/5-daily-promotions/

I could say that they are good on this one.

I have checked those promotions and mentioned them in the review. There are several things I don't like about them:
1. Each challenge is focused on one single game. This is forcing me to play a game that I might don't like to play at all.
2. I have to manually collect some game history links in order to participate, which is not something I would like to spend my time on
3. Most of the challenges have luck-based mechanics, which does not guarantee you any winnings at all. I prefer straightforward promotions - you get a certain reward for a certain amount wagered.

[Lanatsa]

Crypto.games review is published!

Seems low which I do believe that it should be a bit higher but well its your personal review and I do respect it.
When it comes to promotions or offers then you should checked out these links.

https://forum.crypto.games/promotions/
https://forum.crypto.games/forum/5-daily-promotions/

I could say that they are good on this one.

I have checked those promotions and mentioned them in the review. There are several things I don't like about them:
1. Each challenge is focused on one single game. This is forcing me to play a game that I might don't like to play at all.
2. I have to manually collect some game history links in order to participate, which is not something I would like to spend my time on
3. Most of the challenges have luck-based mechanics, which does not guarantee you any winnings at all. I prefer straightforward promotions - you get a certain reward for a certain amount wagered.

Luck based mechanics? Its always been like this just like in most gambling sites and it does really work on that way.

So this turns out this is a personal kind of view or preference which it isn't surprising that setting or giving a 3.5 score out of 5
and just like what others mentioned above then its your criteria then you are the ones who will set out. 

[GamblingBro]

Crypto.games review is published!

Seems low which I do believe that it should be a bit higher but well its your personal review and I do respect it.
When it comes to promotions or offers then you should checked out these links.

https://forum.crypto.games/promotions/
https://forum.crypto.games/forum/5-daily-promotions/

I could say that they are good on this one.

I have checked those promotions and mentioned them in the review. There are several things I don't like about them:
1. Each challenge is focused on one single game. This is forcing me to play a game that I might don't like to play at all.
2. I have to manually collect some game history links in order to participate, which is not something I would like to spend my time on
3. Most of the challenges have luck-based mechanics, which does not guarantee you any winnings at all. I prefer straightforward promotions - you get a certain reward for a certain amount wagered.

Luck based mechanics? Its always been like this just like in most gambling sites and it does really work on that way.

So this turns out this is a personal kind of view or preference which it isn't surprising that setting or giving a 3.5 score out of 5
and just like what others mentioned above then its your criteria then you are the ones who will set out.  

If you check the structure of my reviews, then you will find out, that there are 10 different sections that are contributing to the total score, each giving from zero to 0.5 points to the overall rating.
The promotions is not the only thing that is influencing the rating, so there is no need to focus that much on this section.
When making the reviews I am operating with numbers and facts. In terms of promotions, I try to figure out, how profitable are the promos offered by the casino for the players.

Crypto.games has received 2 points for promos, now let's compare it to the casino that got the maximum of 5 points from me in this section - Duelbits (you can check the full review here). Duelbits is offering bits cashback: instant (10% of the house edge), daily, weekly and monthly (5% of the house edge each). Additionally, there are level up rewards and regular races.

Now let's make a side to side comparison.

What games can you play to get rewards?
Crypto.games: Only one game per day
Duelbits: Every game you can find on the website

What should you do to get a reward?
Crypto.games: Find out what are the details of the coming challenge, collect winning bets, post them on forum
Duelbits: Play any games you want and hit one button to get a reward.

How much will you get after wagering 100 dollars?
Crypto.games: No one will tell you. This is what I call luck-based mechanics: you never know how much in bets would be needed to complete the challenge.
Duelbits: If I play 96% RTP slot, then after wagering 100 USD I will get: 4 USD x 10% = 0.4 USD as an instant reward and 0.6 USD more in total for daily, weekly and monthly cashback.

Now you probably understand better, why Crypto.games has 2 points in the promo section and some other casinos might get a better result here. Despite of having 5 points for the promotions, the total rating of Duelbits is 3.4, which is less than 3.5 for Crypto.games. This also illustrates that not the promos only are not deciding what will be the final score.

I try not to make any judgments based on the 'personal kind of view or preference'. I rather try to operate with the facts and numbers.

[FatFork]

<cut>
So this turns out this is a personal kind of view or preference which it isn't surprising that setting or giving a 3.5 score out of 5
and just like what others mentioned above then its your criteria then you are the ones who will set out. 

Every review you find online represents a personal perspective to some extent. If you don't like it, then you shouldn't read reviews, but facts sheets. 

I personally have no problem with this and enjoy reading other people's opinions about the products and services I use or plan to use in the future. As long as the same standard applies to all websites reviewed, I believe the review is valid. From what I have seen so far, GamblingBro does an excellent job and I find his reviews objective and unbiased. While it's okay to disagree with his set criteria, it is also a matter of personal opinion, right?

[Lanatsa]

<cut>
So this turns out this is a personal kind of view or preference which it isn't surprising that setting or giving a 3.5 score out of 5
and just like what others mentioned above then its your criteria then you are the ones who will set out. 

Every review you find online represents a personal perspective to some extent. If you don't like it, then you shouldn't read reviews, but facts sheets. 

I personally have no problem with this and enjoy reading other people's opinions about the products and services I use or plan to use in the future. As long as the same standard applies to all websites reviewed, I believe the review is valid. From what I have seen so far, GamblingBro does an excellent job and I find his reviews objective and unbiased. While it's okay to disagree with his set criteria, it is also a matter of personal opinion, right?

You're actually right on this one bro! We do have our own preferences and judgment towards things which there might be things which is good for me but not for others.Im not totally making out some contradiction on a hard way and I did just tell my own personal views too basing on long term experience
with the site.

Well we do have our own will on which site or platform which is really best for us.

[khaled0111]

I read almost all the reviews and agree with most of them. The reviews are so detailed and you covered everything any gambler may be interested in. Kudos for that!
The only thing I don't agree with is how the total score (final verdict) is calculated. I believe each section must have a different coefficient based on its effect on the user experience. For example, the legitimacy of the casino shouldn't have the same weight as speed of withdrawals.
Reading the introduction on the main page was also both entertaining and informative. I invite everyone to take the time to read it.

[GamblingBro]

Chips.gg review is published!

Check out my latest Chips.gg review. This casino has received a 3.8 out of 5 rating from me and is now taking first place in the overall leaderboard. Good selection of games, exciting promotions, and instant withdrawals. Although, there are still some things for improvement: the withdrawal fees are too high, there is no welcome offer, and one rakeback-related bug should be fixed.


Check out the review here

[Mahdirakib]

~snip~

Chips.gg now in the first position in your review list by overcoming the rating of Stake.com. Chips received 4 points in promotion part, but Stake received 2 in it. You haven't described much about Stake benefits as you didn't receive anything by playing there. Where you received some CHIP tokens by playing in chips.gg and getting rewards by locking the tokens. You have received nothing else except that. Still they got 4 points out of 5!

BTW, I didn't know Chips.gg have CHIP tokens on their site. I just discovered it through your review and locked my tokens for getting the dividends.

[GamblingBro]

~snip~

Chips.gg now in the first position in your review list by overcoming the rating of Stake.com. Chips received 4 points in promotion part, but Stake received 2 in it. You haven't described much about Stake benefits as you didn't receive anything by playing there. Where you received some CHIP tokens by playing in chips.gg and getting rewards by locking the tokens. You have received nothing else except that. Still they got 4 points out of 5!

BTW, I didn't know Chips.gg have CHIP tokens on their site. I just discovered it through your review and locked my tokens for getting the dividends.

The rakeback was also compensated by the Chips support agent, even though there was a bug and I did not receive it automatically. I think the rakeback right on the start and the dividends deserve two additional points?