🤜 GamblingBro.com 🤛 Honest crypto casino reviews ✅ Tested with real deposits ✅

[GamblingBro]

Honestly we have plenty of places, some good some horrible, that does the same thing. What do you think that you will do differently that will make people check yours out instead of the others? I get that there are tons of very badly made ones that are only there for the profit, the affiliate income from the clicks are what they are after and that is why they do not deserve us going there which you can be better and I understand that.

However how are you going to be better than the good ones? I am not going to name your competition here and put you in a tough spot, but you know which ones I am talking about and maybe you are handling yours very well but that doesn't change the fact that you are trying to make a business in one of the most crowded spaces of crypto, there are hundreds of business' this way and that is why it is a bit harder to get more known.

My reviews are not better or worse than others, they are just mine. I make a deposit and play, showing all the aspects of the gambling websites I review. Besides that I have 10+ years of experience in gambling and know what to check and what tricks can be hidden in T&C. I also know that 95% of the reviews that you can find online are the paid ones and some of them even created by the casino copywriters. So there is a low chance that you will get fair information from such reviews.

[1713558224]

1713558224

[1713558224]

1713558224

[1713558224]

1713558224

[1713558224]

1713558224

[Pmalek]

Honestly we have plenty of places, some good some horrible, that does the same thing. What do you think that you will do differently that will make people check yours out instead of the others?

I don't think the competition amongst honest reviewers is as big as you think. Most of them get paid for the reviews they write. Gambling Bro's blog is free from ads and casino recommendations you often see with the competition. It's very rare to find a site where you don't get bombarded with notifications telling you to sign up to this or that casino. Not to mention that those ads are often for 1xbit. With that move alone, he eliminated half of his competition.

I suggest you have a look at his first review and the segment that focuses on how the casino distorts the truth regarding rollover requirements. 

[nakamura12]

Honestly we have plenty of places, some good some horrible, that does the same thing. What do you think that you will do differently that will make people check yours out instead of the others?

I don't think the competition amongst honest reviewers is as big as you think. Most of them get paid for the reviews they write. Gambling Bro's blog is free from ads and casino recommendations you often see with the competition. It's very rare to find a site where you don't get bombarded with notifications telling you to sign up to this or that casino. Not to mention that those ads are often for 1xbit. With that move alone, he eliminated half of his competition.

True, it is the reason why I also ask sometimes that same question as you have mentioned that some reviews are paid so that the site's review of different gambling sites will be good compared to honest reviews such as this one. I even notice some review sites have a clickable button with a sign up now and contains referral link from each gambling sites that is in thier reviewed site list.

[GamblingBro]

I have finally completed the review of Stake.com

You can find it here

Stake.com casino has received a 3.7 out of 5 rating from me. The lack of any welcome bonuses and terrible cashout commission are the main drawbacks of this casino.

[csgopolygoncode]

Can you do a review about CSGOPolygon.com?

[GamblingBro]

Can you do a review about CSGOPolygon.com?

I mostly play slots, and your website does not offer any. I have a huge list of much more interesting casinos that I will be reviewing next.

[csgopolygoncode]

OK. Understandable. Keep up your good work! 

[Obito]

I have finally completed the review of Stake.com

You can find it here

Stake.com casino has received a 3.7 out of 5 rating from me. The lack of any welcome bonuses and terrible cashout commission are the main drawbacks of this casino.

Holy shit, this is a really risky way to do a review in my opinion since you are funding your own money to do these review, hopefully your review will become a successful site. You might want to consider going for donations in this forum for your review funds so you can do a more extensive review of the games, kind of like the community is paying for you to gamble

[panjul07]

I have finally completed the review of Stake.com

You can find it here

Stake.com casino has received a 3.7 out of 5 rating from me. The lack of any welcome bonuses and terrible cashout commission are the main drawbacks of this casino.

Nice review, I have to agree with most part of the review but of course I cant agree with some part of the review.
Talking about welcome bonuses or deposit bonuses, is it something really attractive these days?
I believe most gamblers (at least my gambling friends) do not like to take any welcome bonuses or deposit bonuses because of its requirement.
Promotions gets 2 points out of 5 is questionable for me, I have to say that Stake is the site that offers so many promotions compared to other casinos.

[kryptqnick]

I think the reviews you're making do stand out from the rest in a good way: they truly look professional. You pay attention to many things and have a detailed grading system. However, I have a couple of questions:
1. Are welcome and wagering bonuses truly that important to get a category of its own, separately from promotions?
2. How will you ensure that your individual bias (which all of us have in some areas) doesn't affect the reviews? Wouldn't it be better to add a separate category like 'overall reputation' which encompasses the opinion of the gambling community? This can also help with ensuring that your rating accounts for selective scamming because otherwise you having some positive experience and giving the casino 5/5 for KYC and 5/5 for withdrawals (hypothetically) might not be representative. Or you could add a comment section below the reviews and then take them into account in your reviews.

[Mahdirakib]

Actually most of the crypto casino charge higher withdrawal fee for BTC. And most often you will feel disappointment by comparing the average fee rate of bitcoin network and the casino withdrawal fee. The first question of ‘kryptqnick’ is logical from my view. Welcome and wagering bonus should get include into promotions. Real gambler doesn't take the welcome bonus as an important thing.

BTW, I got surprised while I noticed that you have given 0 out of 5 in “Bonus wagering requirements” of Stake. You have given this rating as a newbie experience. But Stake deserve higher rating in this section too. They gives rakeback, weekly bonus, monthly bonus based on user wager. I appreciate your review making system but the experience will be different of a regular gambler and new gambler of a casino. I also think that you should add comment option below the reviews.

[Haunebu]

Actually most of the crypto casino charge higher withdrawal fee for BTC. And most often you will feel disappointment by comparing the average fee rate of bitcoin network and the casino withdrawal fee.

I do agree that most crypto casinos charge high withdrawal fees, but this is a valid reason as to why points were deducted in this case. He even provided an example to verify his statement.

Casinos like Bitcasino, Sportsbet etc deserve a higher rating in this area since they literally charge zero withdrawal fees and their minimum withdrawal amounts are low too. Perfect combination!

[GamblingBro]

Nice review, I have to agree with most part of the review but of course I cant agree with some part of the review.
Talking about welcome bonuses or deposit bonuses, is it something really attractive these days?
I believe most gamblers (at least my gambling friends) do not like to take any welcome bonuses or deposit bonuses because of its requirement.
Promotions gets 2 points out of 5 is questionable for me, I have to say that Stake is the site that offers so many promotions compared to other casinos.

Regarding the welcome bonuses: there are several casinos that offer free of wagering deposit bonuses and prizes in the promotions. I will review one of these casinos soon.

Now promotions... Yes, there are a lot of different promos at Stake, but they all are based on the lottery or pure luck mechanics. Those promos might be looking interesting, but they are hard to accomplish. The only goal of these promotions is to force you to bet more and more. I was not able to find any promotion, that I can just participate in and win something without any Influence of luck.

[GamblingBro]

I think the reviews you're making do stand out from the rest in a good way: they truly look professional. You pay attention to many things and have a detailed grading system. However, I have a couple of questions:
1. Are welcome and wagering bonuses truly that important to get a category of its own, separately from promotions?
2. How will you ensure that your individual bias (which all of us have in some areas) doesn't affect the reviews? Wouldn't it be better to add a separate category like 'overall reputation' which encompasses the opinion of the gambling community? This can also help with ensuring that your rating accounts for selective scamming because otherwise you having some positive experience and giving the casino 5/5 for KYC and 5/5 for withdrawals (hypothetically) might not be representative. Or you could add a comment section below the reviews and then take them into account in your reviews.

1. The welcome offers usually do not change that often. The promotions are usually updated and replace on the monthly basis. This is the reason why I divide these offers.
2. How can I be sure that the 'gambling community' opinion is unbiased? I know how things work in gambling: 90% of the reviews and the opinions you can find online are the paid ones. Of course, there is an impact of my personal experience on each review. I will enable the comments soon, that's a good idea indeed.

[GamblingBro]

Actually most of the crypto casino charge higher withdrawal fee for BTC. And most often you will feel disappointment by comparing the average fee rate of bitcoin network and the casino withdrawal fee. The first question of ‘kryptqnick’ is logical from my view. Welcome and wagering bonus should get include into promotions. Real gambler doesn't take the welcome bonus as an important thing.

BTW, I got surprised while I noticed that you have given 0 out of 5 in “Bonus wagering requirements” of Stake. You have given this rating as a newbie experience. But Stake deserve higher rating in this section too. They gives rakeback, weekly bonus, monthly bonus based on user wager. I appreciate your review making system but the experience will be different of a regular gambler and new gambler of a casino. I also think that you should add comment option below the reviews.

A lot of crypto casinos do not take the withdrawal fee at all. Or at least this fee should be reasonable. If I can deposit Bitcoin paying ~4 usd fee, then it is kinda weird to deduct ~8 USD on the withdrawal on the same day.

Real gamblers do not take bonuses and they do not read the casino reviews as well. So my reviews are definitely more useful for novice gamblers.

I have made a 150 usd deposit, played a bit, lost some money, and did not receive any rakeback or weekly bonus. I might even want to play further to get something, but they don't want to let me know what to expect next from the loyalty program.

[YOSHIE]

Here are the websites that I have reviewed so far:
🤜 Stake.com | Rating: 3.7 / 5
🤜 Fairspin | Rating: 2.7 / 5

I spent 1 hour reading the 2 honest reviews you wrote about the Stake.com and Fairspin gambling sites, 90 percentage is exactly what you said, can you add some more about honest reviews like Rollbit site for example, I'd like to see how it's progressing so fa.

But I enjoyed what you wrote about Fairspin, impressive.


oh, yes the last question.
how much time did you spend writing all those reviews, on one gambling site.

[AmoreJaz]

Here are the websites that I have reviewed so far:
🤜 Stake.com | Rating: 3.7 / 5
🤜 Fairspin | Rating: 2.7 / 5

I spent 1 hour reading the 2 honest reviews you wrote about the Stake.com and Fairspin gambling sites, 90 percentage is exactly what you said, can you add some more about honest reviews like Rollbit site for example, I'd like to see how it's progressing so fa.

But I enjoyed what you wrote about Fairspin, impressive.


oh, yes the last question.
how much time did you spend writing all those reviews, on one gambling site.

his review site is actually a comprehensive one as compared to regular review sites. he even included snapshots of conversations with the support, which is actually great! this i think is much better than review sites who are mainly after for the referral commission. even if he is slow trying to publish ratings of these casinos, at least I believe he is indeed doing great job of dissecting each category and be as detailed as much as possible.

[wildan88]

This is one of the best and honest reviews I've seen so far, there's a lot of gambling sites here in the forum I believe I've seen someone make a list already I hope you would be able to review all of them actually I like the way you review and the way you highlighted the important things a player or possible new player should look for.

[GamblingBro]

Check out my Roobet review published today!

While Roobet casino is quite popular here on Bitcointalk, it has received the lowest rating from me so far: 2.5/5
The main drawbacks of this casino are: absence of welcome bonuses, poor promotions, high withdrawal fees, and a complicated KYC process.

Read the review

[Chato1977]

Check out my Roobet review published today!

While Roobet casino is quite popular here on Bitcointalk, it has received the lowest rating from me so far: 2.5/5


The main drawbacks of this casino are: absence of welcome bonuses, poor promotions, high withdrawal fees, and a complicated KYC process.

Read the review

good to see that you have reviewed Roobet but lowest rating? seriously ?

i think you should make a formal review before you do this because I'm sure you are mistaking something.