Bounty managers should try to help bounty hunters get their rewards

[palle11]

This is an issue that should be attended to . Bounty managers should always have it that they need to assist hunters to get what their reward is. Some developers have taken from hunters what their benefits are.

There are some points that should be tackled about this...

1. Ensure that rewards are distributed before they go into exchange. This is because when the coin goes into exchange and starts performing and increase, developers find it difficult to redeem the promise. Dego bounty is an example on that.

2. Always have a good bargain protection for hunters so that no matter what, the reward will go to the hunter after the bounty.

3. Suggest payment in valuable altccoins because protection of workers should be important to any company.

[shinratensei_]

I think that you are wrong if you are only mentioning the manager here. Remember the manager was getting paid to run the campaign and the team will try to deceive what will be the mechanism for the distribution of reward. So many managers have been asking to escrow the reward and the manager can do nothing when the team was refusing to escrow the reward.
It's a double-edged sword.

[palle11]

So many managers have been asking to escrow the reward and the manager can do nothing when the team was refusing to escrow the reward.
It's a double-edged sword.

You know what they need to do in that case?

They need to also refuse managing such scamming project but instead they go on with it or another manager is employed to carry up the project and deceive innocent people. So is not always a double-edged sword if they carry out detailed investigation before taking up the job

[Argoo]

I think that you are wrong if you are only mentioning the manager here. Remember the manager was getting paid to run the campaign and the team will try to deceive what will be the mechanism for the distribution of reward. So many managers have been asking to escrow the reward and the manager can do nothing when the team was refusing to escrow the reward.
It's a double-edged sword.

The problem of non-payment for our agreed work done by the project development team has existed for a long time and so far it has not been practically resolved. Sometimes the transfer of tokens to the bounty pool manager does not even help, which as a reward should be paid to bounty hunters after the bounty campaign.
For example, the Bintex Futures team transferred their BNTX tokens to the Bounty detective manager, and after the end of the bounty changed their tokens to others and refused to send them to the manager. Therefore, the work of the bounty hunters was never rewarded.
This problem should be solved by state regulation of this type of activity.

[semobo]

This is an issue that should be attended to . Bounty managers should always have it that they need to assist hunters to get what their reward is. Some developers have taken from hunters what their benefits are.

There are some points that should be tackled about this...

1. Ensure that rewards are distributed before they go into exchange. This is because when the coin goes into exchange and starts performing and increase, developers find it difficult to redeem the promise. Dego bounty is an example on that.

2. Always have a good bargain protection for hunters so that no matter what, the reward will go to the hunter after the bounty.

3. Suggest payment in valuable altccoins because protection of workers should be important to any company.

Bounty is not a job and the bounty managers are also same like bounty hunters who stuck with such problems as long as the bounty team decided not to release the rewards for their bounty team.

Bounty managers should be responsible for this?

Definitely not, in my opinion because everyone join into the bounties knows the risks so they should be prepared for it.

[sapnu]

There have been plenty of issues way back between bounty hunters and bounty managers and I think it is still evident up until now. Whenever a bounty hunter encounters a scam campaign, their labor results into nothing making them enraged to the bounty manager when in fact, the one they should be blaming is the whole team of the campaign. The manager is only responsible for the peace and coordination of the campaign as they serve as the neutralizer in between hunters and the campaign team. They will surely help you with your rewards if ever the campaign is not a scam but if it is, he is also troubled for sure that's why he cannot aid help for you.

[Galley]

Not everything and not always depends on the project manager, but, nevertheless, a lot. And managers do not always pay due attention to the performance of their duties. They are people too, and among them, there are both responsible and deserving respect, and those who think only about their own enrichment and achieve this in a far from the completely honest way. Many already know who they can trust and who cannot. Therefore, the choice depends on ourselves with whom we work.

[Lorokan]

This is an issue that should be attended to . Bounty managers should always have it that they need to assist hunters to get what their reward is. Some developers have taken from hunters what their benefits are.

There are some points that should be tackled about this...

1. Ensure that rewards are distributed before they go into exchange. This is because when the coin goes into exchange and starts performing and increase, developers find it difficult to redeem the promise. Dego bounty is an example on that.

2. Always have a good bargain protection for hunters so that no matter what, the reward will go to the hunter after the bounty.

3. Suggest payment in valuable altccoins because protection of workers should be important to any company.

You have spoken well and in a reality sense; i think Number 3 is quite achievable; if the bounty manager can compel the projects to choose a cheaper stable coin means of reward or a clear assurance or escrow too. The truth meanwhile is that as long as there are disclaimers on bounty threads that terms are liable to be changed at any time; i think there is little hunters can do

[Gorosden]

This issue have been discussed too many times on this forum, fact is nothing can stop this issue with bounties, you are the only one to avoid joining bounties with no escrow because believe me escrow is the only way to atleast avoid not getting paid in time or at all.

[tbterryboy]

This is an issue that should be attended to . Bounty managers should always have it that they need to assist hunters to get what their reward is. Some developers have taken from hunters what their benefits are.

There are some points that should be tackled about this...

1. Ensure that rewards are distributed before they go into exchange. This is because when the coin goes into exchange and starts performing and increase, developers find it difficult to redeem the promise. Dego bounty is an example on that.

2. Always have a good bargain protection for hunters so that no matter what, the reward will go to the hunter after the bounty.

3. Suggest payment in valuable altccoins because protection of workers should be important to any company.

Bounty Managers should protect bounty hunters, but they should protect the companies they work for as well, that is just the truth. I mean think about it, we are talking about a person who gets paid by the companies and you are expecting them to protect the hunters first? That is not going to happen, they will always keep the companies happy and cheering for them so that they would get good references and make a lot more profit that way, if you keep both hunters and companies happy that would be even better.

I personally like a few people in here, brainboss, hhampuz all those people are great at what they do, but they didn't became great by just declining what companies request and only listening to hunters, they became great by finding more and more companies to keep them happy and eventually reach to a level where all companies know them and can trust them.

[shinratensei_]

So many managers have been asking to escrow the reward and the manager can do nothing when the team was refusing to escrow the reward.
It's a double-edged sword.

You know what they need to do in that case?

They need to also refuse managing such scamming project but instead they go on with it or another manager is employed to carry up the project and deceive innocent people. So is not always a double-edged sword if they carry out detailed investigation before taking up the job

Let's say when there's a legit project that asked the manager to manage its bounty and does the manager need to reject it? A project like persistance, apeswap will never try to destroy its reputation.
I know how do you feel about that but their money their rules.
The hunters just need to DYOR before try to join in any campaign. The managers were always doing the research before trying to manage the campaign.

[oemar bakrie]

We are like betting on time.
there is no black and white agreement that we can ask for direct justice if the project cannot be paid off as the hunters expect
only with complaints that we can do and depending on the conscience of the manager himself who can realize the prize according to the rules..

[Fundamentals Of]

I think it is about time you don't call these users promoting your project mere bounty hunters. They are not really bounty hunters in this current setup. They're promoters, media influencers, video creators, article writers, translators, etc. In other words, they are all marketers and workers of your projects. In this way, they should be treated accordingly. They should not just be treated as useless workers.

Managers are oftentimes just looking after their own payment and don't care about the participants of the campaigns. Most often participants are just treated poorly as if they don't matter at all.

[Bitcoinjheta]

This is recurring issues by the bounty hunters and bounty manager on threads and in fact I also experience this kind of problem,yet still there's no solution on this matter. Only thing we can do is just hope to be paid or leave it and charge to experience.

[iamsange]

This is an issue that should be attended to . Bounty managers should always have it that they need to assist hunters to get what their reward is. Some developers have taken from hunters what their benefits are.

There are some points that should be tackled about this...

1. Ensure that rewards are distributed before they go into exchange. This is because when the coin goes into exchange and starts performing and increase, developers find it difficult to redeem the promise. Dego bounty is an example on that.

2. Always have a good bargain protection for hunters so that no matter what, the reward will go to the hunter after the bounty.

3. Suggest payment in valuable altccoins because protection of workers should be important to any company.

Since past i never complained although sometimes get same experience too. But i think bounty manager will do their best to do their job because it will affect on their reputation. About distribution, usually it is from developer's team and i believe bounty manager wouldn't only silent and keep to follow up the team about distribution. If me, as bounty hunters when see the project is not good like to hold the payment, just talk in forum. Then their investor will know what actually happen to the project and market will decide whether the project success or not because of it.

[XUR_TIP]

Escrow is really needed in this part of crypto space but new crypto teams know what they are doing by saying they don't want escrow, they don't like the idea of making bounty hunters rich when their tokens pump, instead of giving out tokens that they can really afford they promised to give out high tokens allocation for attraction sake

[bitkanu]

there's no solution on this matter. Only thing we can do is just hope to be paid or leave it and charge to experience.

Agreed, the basic thing should be their money their rules. The manager can try to create the best deal with the team about the rules for the payment but the decision will be on the team itself whether they agreed with the agreement that already offered by the manager.
I see that so many managers getting accused by the hunters about the payment. Escrow is a must but the team didn't wanna take this solution.

[Nivia1st]

the bounty manager can't do all that. even if from the beginning the project team had promised to do it, but it's normal in the end they deny it. There are many cases like this and the manager's bounty is to blame. what should be needed is an escrow holding the bounty allocation. can be from bounty managers or third parties who are of reasonable value and will not commit fraud. escrow can help bounty participants get rewards. and the best way for now.

[maxreish]

3. Suggest payment in valuable altcoins because protection of workers should be important to any company.
 

 I dont think they will agree on this part. As the bounty project always pay the rewards with their own coin and distribution will be done after the launch and exchange listing.
 
 The manager is the one who manage the campaign and distribute the rewards. Its because the manager is the one who monitors and know who are the qualified participants to be paid off. As for me, the manager is the wheel of the project. If that gains good reputation and had a good experience handling such projects, there will be assurance that the reward will surely been given off to the participants.

[inanilujimi]

Too often bounty participants will become victims of fraud when a project built from scratch has become large and the project seems to forget the bounty participants who they think are useless junk, even a trusted bounty manager can also become victims and damage their reputation, there are It's good to choose a bounty that has been verified by the bounty manager that the project has really given a token to the manager for assurance during the distribution period.