Bounty managers should try to help bounty hunters get their rewards

[geegaw]

there's no solution on this matter. Only thing we can do is just hope to be paid or leave it and charge to experience.

Agreed, the basic thing should be their money their rules. The manager can try to create the best deal with the team about the rules for the payment but the decision will be on the team itself whether they agreed with the agreement that already offered by the manager.
I see that so many managers getting accused by the hunters about the payment. Escrow is a must but the team didn't wanna take this solution.

Only a few serious teams will make escrow and the manager's job is simpler than ever but too little, most other projects only negotiate one contract for postpay, tokens will remain in the team's wallet and they will only be distributed when the bounty manager completes the spreadsheet in detail and accuracy. The easy operation is based on such principles, the managers do not directly run the project, instead of asking them to help us succeed, we should respect and work together, failures or successes, both parts are shared with each other

[LubovOF]

This is an issue that should be attended to . Bounty managers should always have it that they need to assist hunters to get what their reward is. Some developers have taken from hunters what their benefits are.

There are some points that should be tackled about this...

1. Ensure that rewards are distributed before they go into exchange. This is because when the coin goes into exchange and starts performing and increase, developers find it difficult to redeem the promise. Dego bounty is an example on that.

2. Always have a good bargain protection for hunters so that no matter what, the reward will go to the hunter after the bounty.

3. Suggest payment in valuable altccoins because protection of workers should be important to any company.

Bounty managers must conduct the company well and ensure that the participants comply with the conditions set forth. The participants do not have any contract with the company, so no one formally owes us anything and we do not owe anyone anything. We were offered a reward for fulfilling the conditions, we agreed, or did not agree. It's all in words.

[Atang Sulaeman]

in my opinion the manager is only in charge of supervising whoever joins a bounty,
and for payments that are given back to a team that has funds for a bounty,
the manager is only a bridge for bounty hunters to get a reward,

[palle11]

Bounty is not a job and the bounty managers are also same like bounty hunters who stuck with such problems as long as the bounty team decided not to release the rewards for their bounty team.

Bounty managers should be responsible for this?

Definitely not, in my opinion because everyone join into the bounties knows the risks so they should be prepared for it.

Question , is signature campaign a job? If it is not as your answer, but signature participants get weekly payments in bitcoin.

So why will bounty managers not be responsible to suggest reward in valuable altccoins and also escrow it 

[KimmyF]

This is an issue that should be attended to . Bounty managers should always have it that they need to assist hunters to get what their reward is. Some developers have taken from hunters what their benefits are.

There are some points that should be tackled about this...

1. Ensure that rewards are distributed before they go into exchange. This is because when the coin goes into exchange and starts performing and increase, developers find it difficult to redeem the promise. Dego bounty is an example on that.

2. Always have a good bargain protection for hunters so that no matter what, the reward will go to the hunter after the bounty.

3. Suggest payment in valuable altccoins because protection of workers should be important to any company.

Maybe you missed the point of escrow service. Some don't get success even with escrow service. The last project was Dego Finance. We have so many names before these projects. VIDY and XDB also did the same scam as Dego. Still, I can remember the "inscoin" problem later delisted from the Binance exchange after the last bullran over. Maybe Dego could be delisted from the Binance exchange.

[fortune1002]

I think now bounty manager should take bounty payment from team first then start bounty so that bounty manager can give us bounty payment.

[kak uli]

This is an issue that should be attended to . Bounty managers should always have it that they need to assist hunters to get what their reward is. Some developers have taken from hunters what their benefits are.

There are some points that should be tackled about this...

1. Ensure that rewards are distributed before they go into exchange. This is because when the coin goes into exchange and starts performing and increase, developers find it difficult to redeem the promise. Dego bounty is an example on that.

2. Always have a good bargain protection for hunters so that no matter what, the reward will go to the hunter after the bounty.

3. Suggest payment in valuable altccoins because protection of workers should be important to any company.

In my opinion, when it comes to the distribution of coins, it is only handled by the Team, not by the bounty manager, because the prize manager will hand everything over to the team when the project he manages is completed. as for the price then it is a game on the market, if many sell it after distribution, it is only natural that the price of the coin will experience a low price and vice versa

[Cornia]

There are some reputed bounty managers who are aware of the rights of bounty hunters like CryptopreneurBrainboss but most bounty managers understand only themselves. Even when a bounty is finished, some bounty manager locks up bounty telegram. I left out the projects that fail. Why those which are successful are not paid.  However, most bounty managers promise in their bounty threads that payment will be made within 30 days of the end of the bounty. Why they promise so?

[Willitivity]

This is an issue that should be attended to . Bounty managers should always have it that they need to assist hunters to get what their reward is. Some developers have taken from hunters what their benefits are.

There are some points that should be tackled about this...

1. Ensure that rewards are distributed before they go into exchange. This is because when the coin goes into exchange and starts performing and increase, developers find it difficult to redeem the promise. Dego bounty is an example on that.

2. Always have a good bargain protection for hunters so that no matter what, the reward will go to the hunter after the bounty.

3. Suggest payment in valuable altccoins because protection of workers should be important to any company.

This is true, developers are really something else lately, they no longer like paying what was agreed at the start of bounty campaigns, instead they look for a way not to pay the bounty hunters, but for DEGO at the start distribution was promised but along the line they said users will have to claim the token on their platform and they gave a deadline for the bounty tokens to be redeemed, but with eth gas fees insanely high at that time many bounty hunters were unable to withdraw from their platform and now it seems there won't be any payment any longer, no matter what the bounty manager does, there will still be some greedy dev who wouldn't like to pay bounty after the bounty, I don't think there's much we can do to change that.

[john1010]

You are correct in your post dude, but we cannot deny the fact that there are some BM who are not responsible in the welfare of others, we all know that bounty manager has a safe haven position that sometimes they get the payment 50/50 before and after the campaign, and of course they get paid no matter what happen in the project, and the most tragic situation is, if the project never hit their goal the bounty hunters will affected and never get the reward.

[Tervelatuk]

in my opinion the manager is only in charge of supervising whoever joins a bounty,
and for payments that are given back to a team that has funds for a bounty,
the manager is only a bridge for bounty hunters to get a reward,

manager didnt responsible to bounty payment , but they have responsibility to make sure all bounty reward paid. i am agree they are as bridge between us and developer team , so they must have good communication and bargaining so dev team will not arbitrarily to us.

[aioc]

This is an issue that should be attended to . Bounty managers should always have it that they need to assist hunters to get what their reward is. Some developers have taken from hunters what their benefits are.

There are some points that should be tackled about this...

1. Ensure that rewards are distributed before they go into exchange. This is because when the coin goes into exchange and starts performing and increase, developers find it difficult to redeem the promise. Dego bounty is an example on that.

2. Always have a good bargain protection for hunters so that no matter what, the reward will go to the hunter after the bounty.

3. Suggest payment in valuable altccoins because protection of workers should be important to any company.

Two things every bounty hunters should look at on a campaign, who manages the campaign, and if there is an escrow, a good manager always see to it that workers get paid in time and in full, his credibility and feedbacks coming from bounty hunters are the ones that will build his reputation, escrow is a guaranty that the bounty hunters can work without thinking that they will not get paid and they are motivated to promote the project.

[martina14]

This is an issue that should be attended to . Bounty managers should always have it that they need to assist hunters to get what their reward is. Some developers have taken from hunters what their benefits are.

There are some points that should be tackled about this...

1. Ensure that rewards are distributed before they go into exchange. This is because when the coin goes into exchange and starts performing and increase, developers find it difficult to redeem the promise. Dego bounty is an example on that.

2. Always have a good bargain protection for hunters so that no matter what, the reward will go to the hunter after the bounty.

3. Suggest payment in valuable altccoins because protection of workers should be important to any company.

There are only two types of Bounty Managers here in the forum, the good and the bad one, what do I mean for this?
there are some managers who manage the campaign projects asking for the Owner or team to use escrows to make sure the
payment will be give to all the participants who will partake in the campaign, but sometimes the dev. or team are avoiding this where
the Bounty managers sometimes can't do nothing but to accept the projects even without the escrows due to He also needs money, then
the bad one sometimes they cheat the participants to steal the rewards, in short, He took advantage His position to do this via removing the
participants without any reason, but I'm not saying all Managers doing this thing just thought and assessment only based on my observation.

[gabbie2010]

A responsible bounty manager should always ensure that tokens are escrowed if possible and response with quick feedback on whatever issues raised by any hunter on their telegram handle, of course there are good BM who posses those qualities mentioned, moreso before distribution of tokens BM should always ensure that all deserving hunters receives their tokens appropriately before listing in an exchange, I read a post of hunter not duly informed on the change of token address thus lost the opportunity earning of his rewards

[Wawa2013]

This is an issue that should be attended to . Bounty managers should always have it that they need to assist hunters to get what their reward is. Some developers have taken from hunters what their benefits are.

There are some points that should be tackled about this...

1. Ensure that rewards are distributed before they go into exchange. This is because when the coin goes into exchange and starts performing and increase, developers find it difficult to redeem the promise. Dego bounty is an example on that.

2. Always have a good bargain protection for hunters so that no matter what, the reward will go to the hunter after the bounty.

3. Suggest payment in valuable altccoins because protection of workers should be important to any company.

There are only two types of Bounty Managers here in the forum, the good and the bad one, what do I mean for this?
there are some managers who manage the campaign projects asking for the Owner or team to use escrows to make sure the
payment will be give to all the participants who will partake in the campaign, but sometimes the dev. or team are avoiding this where
the Bounty managers sometimes can't do nothing but to accept the projects even without the escrows due to He also needs money, then
the bad one sometimes they cheat the participants to steal the rewards, in short, He took advantage His position to do this via removing the
participants without any reason, but I'm not saying all Managers doing this thing just thought and assessment only based on my observation.

Everything you say I agree, because good Bounty Managers must ensure that bounty hunters get rewards. One of them is by requiring the project
owner to use escrows, and if the project owner refuses it should be good Bounty Managers refuse to promote the project. But in fact there are still
many Bounty Managers who always follow the wishes of project owners, because all they care about is that their fees as Bounty Managers have
been paid. Hopefully more and more Bounty Managers in this forum will think about the fate of bounty hunters.

[hulla]

A responsible bounty manager should always ensure that tokens are escrowed if possible and response with quick feedback on whatever issues raised by any hunter on their telegram handle, of course there are good BM who posses those qualities mentioned, moreso before distribution of tokens BM should always ensure that all deserving hunters receives their tokens appropriately before listing in an exchange, I read a post of hunter not duly informed on the change of token address thus lost the opportunity earning of his rewards

You can say that responsible bounty manager ought to escrow the bounty reward because some nounty manager was indeed naive about their job but if you ask every bounty manager they will tell you that it not a easy task and some project owner also scam them at some point so it not totally their fault in some area.

[LogitechMouse]

1. Ensure that rewards are distributed before they go into exchange. This is because when the coin goes into exchange and starts performing and increase, developers find it difficult to redeem the promise. Dego bounty is an example on that.

Correct me if I'm wrong but is there a way to multi-send ERC20 tokens like what are they doing with Bitcoin.
Sometimes it is the problem why reward distribution is being delayed or worst, the team doesn't really want to pay these hunters and the manager is the one who is blamed with.

2. Always have a good bargain protection for hunters so that no matter what, the reward will go to the hunter after the bounty.

So you're saying like an assurance that the hunters will get their reward no matter what?
I don't think so and that is risk of joining in a bounty campaign. You will either be paid or not and there is nothing we can do about it or maybe if the campaign is being managed by these highly reputable campaign managers.

3. Suggest payment in valuable altccoins because protection of workers should be important to any company.

Bounty campaign has been here and there are only few campaigns that are paying their hunters in valuable or at least altcoins that already has a value and exchangeable. Most of them are just giving their native token which doesn't have any value at the start and that is the risk of it. I don't think that this will happen because owner of the project will not risk their own money just to pay these hunters and that is the sad truth.
Overall, there are some managers who really are paying these hunters but there are some who are just thinking of themselves being paid and nothing more. You have 2 choices as a bounty hunter, either accept it or stop/leave it .

[coin-investor]

Currently, there are indeed many cases regarding bounty managers who do not help participants to seek payments. in the Reputation selection you can check many bounty managers who have problems because there is no clarity regarding payments. This certainly makes many participants disappointed because their rights to what they do do not receive payment as they should

It will tarnish their image if they are reported not helping qualified bounty hunters to receive their rewards, I have seen many bounty managers losing their reputation and their job because of too many complaints coming from bounty hunters, the community will tagged this manager while the developer of the project will also have a scam report, the bounty manager must use an escrow to guaranty that bounty hunters will get their shares.

[sulis sudibyo]

what about escrow, isn't this method enough to ensure the reward of the bounty participants is paid. There must be a third party overseeing this, the project team must send the campaign rewards to the escrow before the campaign starts. and after the campaign ends, escrow sends it to the prize manager or directly to the bounty participants. but the problem is the difficulty of finding parties or people who have the competence to become escrow and have a guarantee not to commit fraud.