.

[vinca BK.]

.

[ryzaadit]

Because there have several reasons, most the people skeptical about every "hash game" even the game has some provably fair they think the game has some bot chasing them when they are bet to make it lose. Comparing on "LIVE BLACKJACK", If you play on high roller table you can make some request to re-shuffly in front of you to make it has some trust value to the game.

[avikz]

I have a roobet account and i was looking for blackjack, and i only found real live tables, why do they use this and not use blackjack which depends on provably fair? Isn't that more economical for them than paying dealers' salaries and location or service entirely? Have not we yet progressed to not using this old stuff ?

Why not live blackjack? I mean what's the issue in live blackjack anyway? A live game is always better than a game against house where the house can use bots and scripts to fill their pockets. I personally think it is always better to have a pvp game arranged and monitored by the house to maintain clarity. House gets the house egde from every game and players get to play with real people. Win win proposition!

[Lakai01]

Why not live blackjack? I mean what's the issue in live blackjack anyway? A live game is always better than a game against house where the house can use bots and scripts to fill their pockets.
-snip-

Definitely, yes. When playing blackjack with real players, the chance of getting cheated by the casino is very low. Mechanisms such as "Provably Fair" are of little help if, for example, the casino provides 3 of the 4 players or works with bots - and thus knows all hands.

@OP
So see this more as an offer to play a fair game than a disadvantage because you prefer to play with "anonymous" players.

[MAAManda]

Do you want to play with Blackjack provided by the Platform? With Live Blackjack, there is little chance of cheating...

This is how the gambling platform can maintain the trust of its users.

[Insanerman]

I have a roobet account and i was looking for blackjack, and i only found real live tables, why do they use this and not use blackjack which depends on provably fair? Isn't that more economical for them than paying dealers' salaries and location or service entirely? Have not we yet progressed to not using this old stuff ?

BlackJack being played live online is just a way to still let the users feel what it is like to be in real casino that no bots nor any algorithms can provide. Also, not because the modernity (online gambling) is way convenient and cheaper to casino companies, does also means that they should not consider adding the traditional way of playing a gambling game. Imagine this, would you love to see NBA being betted if the players plays in 2K apps like in PS4/XBOX? LOL it's just the same idea as how you want to eradicate the live show bettings.

[just_Alice]

I guess it's because the majority of players prefer live blackjack they left it as an only option. And why not? Apart from the fact that live pvp games ensure transparency in the game, as many mentioned here, it also has the advantage of making the game more real-like, I think it's awesome.
The only con I find in live casino games is a relatively slow dealing as compared to the automatic in non-live ones.

[Fortify]

I have a roobet account and i was looking for blackjack, and i only found real live tables, why do they use this and not use blackjack which depends on provably fair? Isn't that more economical for them than paying dealers' salaries and location or service entirely? Have not we yet progressed to not using this old stuff ?

There's quite a few reasons why they might use live blackjack and it will always be fairer than any computer generated random numbers. If you look into it, it's actually extremely difficult to create a truly random number using a computer program (probably fair or not), however they can do a good enough job to satisfy most needs. These dealers don't necessarily need to be in a casino, it just requires a roulette wheel and a green screen really. It is definitely a distinguishing factor that low level gambling operations won't have and might give the players more faith in placing bets, since they are professional enough to afford to hire someone for this job. You should remember that this live roulette feed might be shared across many sites (including fiat casinos) which would reduce the cost and it is a relatively unskilled job that can be performed by anyone - unlike quick fire blackjack dealing for example. You have to remember that cost of living can also vary wildly between countries, so they might be paying very low salaries to the operators who live in low cost of living countries.

[Silberman]

I have a roobet account and i was looking for blackjack, and i only found real live tables, why do they use this and not use blackjack which depends on provably fair? Isn't that more economical for them than paying dealers' salaries and location or service entirely? Have not we yet progressed to not using this old stuff ?

Many people still prefer the old ways also when you are paying blackjack in many online casinos the deck is shuffled after each hand and you have no chance to perform anything but the basic strategy, but with a dealer actually dealing the cards you can perform more advanced strategies, obviously if you use something like card counting you could even earn money in the casino but as you may guess casinos do not like this and if they catch you card counting then you are going to get banned most likely from that casino.

[Fatunad]

I guess it's because the majority of players prefer live blackjack they left it as an only option. And why not? Apart from the fact that live pvp games ensure transparency in the game, as many mentioned here, it also has the advantage of making the game more real-like, I think it's awesome.
The only con I find in live casino games is a relatively slow dealing as compared to the automatic in non-live ones.

Yes, its slow but it is much better to have this kind of set-up rather than on seeing it to be fast but you cant really be sure nor be that confident when it comes to fairness.
Honestly, majority of blackjack players would most likely be prefering on seeing it or dealing it with live than with those automation process as i would also prefer on this
way.It might be slow or a bit time consuming but i do prefer this way.

Most of gambling sites nowadays does offer live blackjack and there's some which arent.So if you do prefer to have fast pace game then you can always have the
option or choices for you to do so.

[BTCLiz]

I have a roobet account and i was looking for blackjack, and i only found real live tables, why do they use this and not use blackjack which depends on provably fair? Isn't that more economical for them than paying dealers' salaries and location or service entirely? Have not we yet progressed to not using this old stuff ?

Some players obviously have prefernces to play versus a real human. They also like to chat/speak with the dealer. Especially now in times of Corona there are many people who went to analog casinos before and now started to play online. For them this kind with real human has some advantages.

[abel1337]

If I would choose between live real blackjack or a coded blackjack machine, I will still prefer live blackjack. It's not prone to cheating and for me, it is more entertaining since you can see real people operating the table.

Every gambler has a different preference and I think most gamblers prefer the "old stuff" that's why casinos are offering live tables in their casino.

[KTChampions]

Because there have several reasons, most the people skeptical about every "hash game" even the game has some provably fair they think the game has some bot chasing them when they are bet to make it lose. Comparing on "LIVE BLACKJACK", If you play on high roller table you can make some request to re-shuffly in front of you to make it has some trust value to the game.

It seems to me that if the player as a whole trusts the casino, then he trusts all the games in it. It is illogical to trust dice, but not to trust blackjack. I think the reason is simpler - this game is losing its popularity as people choose other games, this is a natural process, there is nothing unusual here.

[stomachgrowls]

I have a roobet account and i was looking for blackjack, and i only found real live tables, why do they use this and not use blackjack which depends on provably fair? Isn't that more economical for them than paying dealers' salaries and location or service entirely? Have not we yet progressed to not using this old stuff ?

Some players obviously have prefernces to play versus a real human. They also like to chat/speak with the dealer. Especially now in times of Corona there are many people who went to analog casinos before and now started to play online. For them this kind with real human has some advantages.

For those gamblers who do really get used to in face to face or real blackjack experience then most likely they will really be looking for something like this where they do much prefer
on playing live on where they can see other players who are on the other side and even with the dealer.

Its true that this will really be on self-preference and its good that gambling sites do offer something like this rather than on sticking with coded ones which might not really be giving out
some confidence while you do play because you are minding about the fairness.

It seems to me that if the player as a whole trusts the casino, then he trusts all the games in it. It is illogical to trust dice, but not to trust blackjack.

You got a point bro and i would definitely be having the same impression specially if im dealing with a trusted casino.You wont really be having those kind of questions in mind.

[adzino]

I have a roobet account and i was looking for blackjack, and i only found real live tables, why do they use this and not use blackjack which depends on provably fair? Isn't that more economical for them than paying dealers' salaries and location or service entirely? Have not we yet progressed to not using this old stuff ?

Like what others said. People probably prefer live blackjack because they believe it's more fair and the casino cannot cheat (though I have heard casinos sometimes uses underhanded tactic to cheat their clients). Thus they find live blackjacks more reliable. But a legit online casino with computerized/programmed blackjack will never cheat and users can usually verify all their bets easily. Again, some people enjoy interacting with the host and other people when gambling. So maybe social interaction is why people prefer live blackjack?

[agustina2]

I don't have experience playing Blackjack on Roobet yet but I think there's a Blackjack games where it's all about provably fair.

There are about several Blackjack of different types there but not all are accessible to region. Example here in my region, the live Blackjack you are talking is not possible to access here. Maybe that was the case to you that's why you can't access the other Blackjack games.

But even if it's purely live betting, I don't see how this old stuff is a problem. If Roobet can afford to pay dealers, why should we take it as a problem?

[johhnyUA]

Because there have several reasons, most the people skeptical about every "hash game" even the game has some provably fair they think the game has some bot chasing them when they are bet to make it lose. Comparing on "LIVE BLACKJACK", If you play on high roller table you can make some request to re-shuffly in front of you to make it has some trust value to the game.

In other words, people doesn't like technology and robots 
There too many ways to shuffle cards bad with human hands, so personally, i would trust more to any provably fair game, rather than with a human one.