I always thought that when a project delays its implementation for many years, it often leads to nothing good, but we see the opposite, the team worked hard for a long time, and in the end we see what a successful project it turned out to be.
That totally depends on the how reliable the team and development progress that has been made. ICP is not the first case but i can tell you some coins that were doing the same thing like ICP.
if you know about file coin and this coin needs a few years to be launched in the market and it was giving very good result to the all of ico buyers.
Great analysis. All that promising progress only to be turned into a rug pull by developers themselves. We should have looked into it more and trusted less into Dominic. Dfinity did its community wrong.
We created a new community divorced from Dfinity. It was formed after experiencing significant deception, immense frustration, and lack of communication.
It is a community-driven project founded by people who were once part of the Dfinity community from inception and they are now part of an amalgamation of volunteers working for ICPR.
In comparison to Dfinity, ICPR will first be represented as an ERC-20 token in an open and honest format. ICPR will run on a truly democratic decentralized governance system in which members decide how to fork and improve upon this protocol while retaining flexibility on the direction of the network.
Instead of what happened with ICP, where the Dfinity team controlled over 50% of token supply, ICPR intends to have a fair and fully decentralized distribution of its tokens. One of the core principles is to achieve justice by reallocating tokens that the foundation held and unlocking tokens that the actual owners were denied access to. Join us as we fight for a truly decentralized ICP
https://np.reddit.com/r/icpReboot/