1xbit is at it again with bounty and a signature campaign

[abel1337]

Also, we have no connections with 1xBet, it is seen via Curacao license: web archive

Does 1xbit have any betting licenses at all, because I can't find any information on your website?

I registered on your website to test it and I talked with your terrible customer support who can't answer simple questions I asked them, so I wonder are they just stupid or you teach them to ignore some questions?

Another problem is that you hired and accepted all members with negative trust who promoted adkinsbet scam, and they are all controlled by one guy, or maybe you are part of the same crew as adkinsbet.

Their customer support is very bad since then, Too many complaints and some tickets were not resolved that leaves gamblers hanging. They declared that they have their Curacao license though I'm not sure myself if it is legit. 

I think they are desperate for campaign members to join so they accepted anyone regardless of their status and risk if it is multiple accounts.

Scam casino + campaign cheaters = perfect 

[1714993415]

1714993415

[1714993415]

1714993415

[1714993415]

1714993415

[1714993415]

1714993415

[1714993415]

1714993415

[TalkStar]

____________	_______________________	__________________
wildan88	Adkinsbet scam shiller	Trust: +0 / =2 / -6
sempak	Adkinsbet scam shiller	Trust: +0 / =1 / -4
BlackFor3st	Adkinsbet scam shiller	Trust: +0 / =0 / -5
Erdogan	Scammer	Trust: +0 / =0 / -5
gadado	Adkinsbet scam shiller	Trust: +0 / =1 / -3
yayayo	Adkinsbet scam shiller	Trust: +0 / =0 / -2
Naficopa	Malubit scam shiller	Trust: +0 / =2 / -1
Pealr12	Bounty cheater	Trust: +0 / =0 / -1
Tumanggor	Bounty cheater	Trust: +0 / =0 / -1
jinxing		Trust: +0 / =0 / -0
Alisha-k		Trust: +0 / =0 / -0
proTECH77		Trust: +0 / =0 / -0
Ebede		Trust: +0 / =0 / -0
target		Trust: +0 / =0 / -0

Oh yeah,,,List of accepted participants and their previous work history is not so amazing.

No doubt that their platform is popular among most of these red trusted scammers and they have chosen their side. Its looking so funny to see all these accepted participants and  am thinking what will they do after getting scammed by 1xbit. Actually we can't change people mind and its pretty much common that scammers will join anything without proper justification.

Scam casino + campaign cheaters = perfect 

You got it exactly.

[Kittygalore]

I wonder if 1xbit knows that 5 of the members they have accepted have been bought and most likely are controlled by a single person. and looking at the campaign thread again, more of the accounts adkinsbet bought are trying to join the campaign.

People should post in their signature campaign thread that they are a scam and that anyone who will join their campaign will probably never receive a payment for their efforts. I think they know that we know those accounts are controlled by them and that they are just ignoring it hoping that they can catch some victims out of it.

[logfiles]

Compiled a more structured list, where the default trust is marked, through the code ;dt. The overwhelming majority of the accepted participants are those who have previously been seen in the casino scam shilling. But there are also those who have a clean trust. I wonder if the community will give these users a note in the trust that they advertise the 1xbit scam, as was done with the Yobit campaign? And if so, what kind of tag will it be?

Hey Ratimov, thanks for the list. Looks like some of them are not wearing or removed the signatures, and I am also seeing new applicants who are already wearing 1xbit signatures. I will observe the accounts over the weekend.

I am going to tag and flag any account that wears 1xbit signature and actively posts (whether it already has red trust or not). The point is they are willing to advertise scam and this should not be accepted. Let them first pay up the people they have scammed.

I don't care how much they are putting in the campaign. It's blood money.... scammed money!

[Botnake]

Participants without a red tag will not risk applying their account, maybe some DT will not tag but there's a risk that their account will still be tagged. I guess all of the accepted applicants have a red tag already and I believe 1xbit already sees this coming since in their rules they allowed a red-tagged account to apply.

The reward is quite attractive, but if it would result in the account getting tag, I guess it's not worth to risk.

I don't know how DT would treat this, I saw yobit ran a signature campaign before, and non of the members were tagged IIRC.

[BITCOIN4X]

Participants without a red tag will not risk applying their account, maybe some DT will not tag but there's a risk that their account will still be tagged. I guess all of the accepted applicants have a red tag already and I believe 1xbit already sees this coming since in their rules they allowed a red-tagged account to apply.

The reward is quite attractive, but if it would result in the account getting tag, I guess it's not worth to risk.

I don't know how DT would treat this, I saw yobit ran a signature campaign before, and non of the members were tagged IIRC.

Greedy, that is the reason why some people are so interested in risking the reputation of their account and advertising scam site.
If a site can resolve previous scam accusation well then it is unlikely that they will have forum users and contributors going against them. So far the DT have done well and have informed everyone here with active fact and accusation. I thought this would help the community to avoid scammed from the site.

[sujonali1819]

I don't know how DT would treat this, I saw yobit ran a signature campaign before, and non of the members were tagged IIRC.

Yes, but what was the displayed ads there? It was cryptotalk.org that means they did not displayed directly yobit for why maybe the most reputed member considered it.

But 1xbit is now launching there own campaign by creating new fresh account couple of times. This also one type of cheating that they are fooling people by creating new account instead of using old one which has a lot of red & flag.

[qwertyup23]

Participants without a red tag will not risk applying their account, maybe some DT will not tag but there's a risk that their account will still be tagged. I guess all of the accepted applicants have a red tag already and I believe 1xbit already sees this coming since in their rules they allowed a red-tagged account to apply.

The reward is quite attractive, but if it would result in the account getting tag, I guess it's not worth to risk.

I don't know how DT would treat this, I saw yobit ran a signature campaign before, and non of the members were tagged IIRC.

Greedy, that is the reason why some people are so interested in risking the reputation of their account and advertising scam site.
If a site can resolve previous scam accusation well then it is unlikely that they will have forum users and contributors going against them. So far the DT have done well and have informed everyone here with active fact and accusation. I thought this would help the community to avoid scammed from the site.

To be honest, most participants who applied (and subsequently got accepted) into the campaign are the ones who have a previously negative-tagged accounts due to their connection with alt account farming. They saw an opportunity to apply in a campaign that the owner is previously negative-tagged also.

I find it really appalling to see that they got accepted and they're probably sharing spam or plagiarized messages across the forum.

[acroman08]

People should post in their signature campaign thread that they are a scam

you should visit their signature campaign thread. you'll see a lot of people posting warnings and their opinion about the signature and the website.

and that anyone who will join their campaign will probably never receive a payment for their efforts.

that's hard to tell, they might get paid they might not. besides. I think they are prepared to take a risk if they are still willing to join the campaign and ignoring the red flags presented by other members of the forum. so let them be and if they are not paid, those members who joined will most likely remove the signature themselves.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

If nothing has changed since the last time the admin wrote that post, then his attitude towards advertising a service that has such reputation will be identical - meaning it will ban their signature, similar to what happened with YoBit in the past.

Yobit popped into my head too when I started reading this thread, though I think 1xbit has a much worse reputation than Yobit does. 

What I'm wondering is whether their campaign is going to continue or not--last time Yobit started a signature campaign it was shut down pretty quickly, although I think part of that was the number of participants they had (it was a lot, but I can't remember exactly how many).  This 1xbit campaign thread doesn't say how many members they'll accept, nor how long the campaign is supposed to run, but hopefully there won't be too many participants.  I hope that, but given that they're paying a pretty good rate for 15 posts a week, I'd imagine there are going to be a lot of applicants.

To be honest, most participants who applied (and subsequently got accepted) into the campaign are the ones who have a previously negative-tagged accounts due to their connection with alt account farming.

Shocker, there.  Any signature campaign that accepts red-tagged members is going to be swarmed with applicants of the lowest quality.  If 1xbit had any integrity, they would think twice about letting untrustworthy members advertise for them.

[FatFork]

To be honest, most participants who applied (and subsequently got accepted) into the campaign are the ones who have a previously negative-tagged accounts due to their connection with alt account farming.

Shocker, there.  Any signature campaign that accepts red-tagged members is going to be swarmed with applicants of the lowest quality.  If 1xbit had any integrity, they would think twice about letting untrustworthy members advertise for them.

Since all of the accounts linked to Adkinsbet scam are most likely managed by the same person, there is no need to refer to them in the plural.
Even though there have been suspicions before, it is now quite clear. Compare their application time to the campaign (all within a few minutes of each other) and the time of their last activity on the forum to confirm that it is the same person.

I have no idea why 1xBit would hire those accounts. There is no way they can benefit from such promotion at all.
My opinion is that either they don't care about the campaign and who will promote them because they have no intention of paying anyone, or they have something to do with the Adkinsbet scam, so they control those accounts, and the whole campaign is just a cheap theatrical facade.

[Kittygalore]

~

you should visit their signature campaign thread. you'll see a lot of people posting warnings and their opinion about the signature and the website.

I did check the signature campaign thread yes, there is a lot of people warning them about the signature campaign and the website itself.

~

that's hard to tell, they might get paid they might not. besides. I think they are prepared to take a risk if they are still willing to join the campaign and ignoring the red flags presented by other members of the forum. so let them be and if they are not paid, those members who joined will most likely remove the signature themselves.

No, I disagree that it is hard to tell because you just need to know their reputation in this forum to not even consider joining the campaign, why would you risk joining when you know that there is a really big chance that you aren't going to get paid plus you are spreading a scam website if you join their campaign.

[BITCOIN4X]

To be honest, most participants who applied (and subsequently got accepted) into the campaign are the ones who have a previously negative-tagged accounts due to their connection with alt account farming. They saw an opportunity to apply in a campaign that the owner is previously negative-tagged also.

You are right, I have looked at them one by one and some of them are still untagged.

I find it really appalling to see that they got accepted and they're probably sharing spam or plagiarized messages across the forum.

I am not sure they will be paid by the site because basically hiring them will not increase the site's reputation and revenue through new players. People who know the reputation of the site will no longer use the site because of the risk, so what's the point of paying those who are clearly participant who have been negative trust.

[Slow death]

I am not sure they will be paid by the site because basically hiring them will not increase the site's reputation and revenue through new players.

I think they will be paid, this site has money and I don’t really believe that they are concerned with reputation, they can have a lot of new customers every day and they can pay for advertising elsewhere, so they must be angry because a small group of a forum anonymous that they are DT is pressuring them to do the right thing, it must be hurting their ego

People who know the reputation of the site will no longer use the site because of the risk, so what's the point of paying those who are clearly participant who have been negative trust.

honestly i still think that there are people here on the forum who even knowing the situation of this site will still continue using this site

[DireWolfM14]

Or they'll just "cancel" the campaign after the application thread is flooded with scam warning posts. They get a few days of free promotion and can blame the "trolls".

To my surprise they actually payed for the bounty reviews they requested.  I honestly didn't expect a payment, my review was primarily a scam warning, and I gave their newest account a red-tag.  But they honored their word, which is something.  So, maybe they will actually pay the sig campaign participants.

There's something else that strikes me as kind of weird about the sig campaign; the fact that they allow negative-trusted accounts didn't really settle on me at fist, but then when they accepted 5 members of the AtkinsBet Army of Alts that stuck me as weird.  They also left out any restrictions for having multiple accounts registered in the campaign, and more likely than not, those AdkinsBet shills are all sockpuppets of one person.  Maybe I'm just being paranoid, cynical, skeptical, or (most likely,) a combination of all three, but it's almost like they planned for red-tagged sockpuppets to make up the majority of applicants.  Makes you wonder if there's any affiliation between the folks behind AdkinsBET and 1xbit.

[stompix]

Maybe I'm just being paranoid, cynical, skeptical, or (most likely,) a combination of all three, but it's almost like they planned for red-tagged sockpuppets to make up the majority of applicants. Makes you wonder if there's any affiliation between the folks behind AdkinsBET and 1xbit.

Then I'm being paranoid to thinking they are allowing those accounts to participate in the campaign just as a cover-up as those accounts are actually used by the same people who run the website and there is no real payment going on there but once the week is over they can claim look, we have paid more than 3000$ or whatever in signature earnings, we're legit!!!!! And actually,  I don't see this as a possibility rather I wonder why would anyone think this is not what's happening!

As for the payments for the reviews, I was pretty sure they were going to pay, it was clearly a promo move to gain trust if possible or at least have some comeback on the people accusing them of being scammers, they spend what, like 300$ on all this for those and just one 0.1 BTC from a gullible user that sees them throwing money around would make up for all the costs.