Most of the campaigns require posting x amount of post to be eligible for payment. Most of the campaigns require at least 20 posts per week to get paid while only Chipmixer has the benefit of no minimum post.
Why other campaign managers don't follow the same rule? Would that be less effective? I don't think so.
To a campaign that is planning to just run for about a week or two or perhaps a month, that might be less effective. They badly want to be seen and therefore promoted within a shorter period of time.
There are many campaigns that will test the waters first. They will run for a couple of weeks, make an assessment of the effectivity of the campaign, and then decide whether to continue or not. A Chipmixer approach may not be the best kind in this case.
Wouldn’t it be good if every campaign manager follow the same rule? It would generate good quality post, less spam and more effective as good quality post would get more attention than low quality.
I guess the campaign manager does not have the sole say as to how the campaign would run. The manager would probably lay all the options and perhaps discuss with the company how they would go about the campaign.
I think a wider visibility is a consideration. In which case, 25 posts might be preferred more than 10. That's simply maximizing the cost and the limited time.