Review on apollo btc miner

[philipma1957]

...
Well thats the beauty of Bitcoin, you dont need to trust anyone, just verify. Bitcoin's POW is simple on purpose. Your hardware can either solve SHA256 hashes or it can not.
...

Since you seem to think that you are some expert about softgware and hardware, and that there's no difference between finding a share or a block,
how is it possible that in Dec 2015 a miner on slush withheld around 28 blocks by accident but was mining shares and getting the right hash rate?
There were 228 other blocks found that month on the pool by other miners, but zero by genesis who was something like 10% of the pool.

Go read up about the discussion back then and you might get a clue ... or not.

It's possible to have a hardware issue with blocks, and it's also possible to have a software issue regarding blocks.
Since you probably haven't got a clue about how the hardware works, and what possible problems there are there,
have an actual look at the code for your miner.
One simple example:
Does it send every nonce the hardware returns back to the pool?
Or is there code deciding if it should send the share?

Yeah really takes a rocket scientist to understand that issue
Or someone who claims they no it all, but are an idiot to not understand it.

for transparency sake

[philipma1957]

uh what?

You dont need to "prove" it can hit a block, the proof is in the valid share submission.

Submit enough shares of a certain difficulty over time and you have "proved" your hashrate.

Submit a share higher than the network diff you found a block, simple as that.

Well same as you my position is exactly what you said. Just worded in a different way.

Kano always attacks all btc sha-256 software

He will say you stole it from cgminer and if it clear is not a copy he will say prove it can hit a block.

As I said I am in the USA and you are innocent until proven guilty which means if he wants to complain about blocks he needs to prove it can't hit a block.

Sigh, another person who really doesn't understand how software and hardware works.
I've given a really simply example on my post above this.

Also making false accusations really make you sound pretty bad.

He will say you stole it from cgminer

I point out the simple fact that anyone who uses cgminer in their firmware must provide source code.
I'm not sure why you support these people who violate the cgminer license.
Doesn't look good for you at all, even though you continue to do it.

The 'apollo' didn't use cgminer. That's obvious, and I've never claimed they did.
Please stop making repeated false accusations about me.
No doubt you enjoy the fact that you have a following of people who will listen to your false accusations, but please stop it.

If you feel that it is ok for people to sell you software that isn't properly tested and might lose you 1/4 million $ - I'd wonder why anyone would take any notice of you.

also for the sake of transparency

[philipma1957]

At kano.

you will be deleted everytime you post here .

until you apologize for calling jstefanop an  i word

Once again.

you are simply out of control bro 😎

try to see yourself and how you sound.

[philipma1957]

lol - I really care nothing at all about my post count - it's almost 14,000 anyway.
You've deleted plenty of my posts in the past anyway (18) when you threw a tantrum about the forum April fool day joke last year.

You've reposted my messages anyway

Though not sure why you are claiming that the last line of that post is correct: that he doesn't understand what he claims he does

for transparency sake.


Rather than go off track And argue I will lock thread.