How to judge whether newly listed coins are worth investing?

[IbizaToken]

I try to look at all their media channels and communication. Also trying to find out who is behind, and the reputation of those people.
Afterwards its good to analyse the website itself, and road map, and see if it makes sense and if they are following it. The platform it is build on is also a big hint. I will trust more projects on ETH, as ETH already does a selection.

At the moment I am doing word of mouth for Ibiza Token, which for me meets al criteria.
Is new, strong team, roadmap is being followed, unique local concept with international appeal, partnerships are legit, good messaging, active facebook and Instagram, unique local product, on uniswap, build on Ethereum.

Sounds good to me, excited about this project.

A lot of info you can find on their facebook page:
https://www.facebook.com/ibizatoken

Also created a topic here to discuss this project:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5352596.0

What you guys think?

[1714309133]

1714309133

[1714309133]

1714309133

[1714309133]

1714309133

[seramania]

Don't you consider how big the community behind it? Remember that if the hype was coming from the community that was spreading the word about the project. The potential or big project will always have a very big community behind it. The communicy was also playing a very important role to make the project became a successful project. This already proven by so many major crypto projects.
A new potential coin will always have a solid community behind it

the community is actually the second factor. the main thing is that the team itself and also which exchange is listed determines a token. because what I know is that tokens will be easy to grow if they are listed on a large exchange and have a lot of support from the community. that's the perfect composition

[XUNing]

1.project team  There will always be a very large community behind a potential project to promote the success of the project.
2.white paper  Through the white paper, you can learn about many project parties' data, such as transaction volume, currency holding addresses, and the amount of funds in the mining pool.
3.Exchange listing  Many newly-listed tokens will be used on unheard of cryptocurrency exchanges with very low trading volume. If it is listed on Binance, it may be the most anticipated of all projects.

[Ararbermas]

The real information of the projects is important and of course the team behind if its genuine or not. Because mostly projects nowadays using fake people behind the project that's why they run the money without any hesitation when something bad happens in the market. So when picking a project bear in mind that you must assure that you have enough information before investing and etc, so that afterwards its worth it not a waste of time.

[sirminesalot]

For around the last year I have not seen one single coin that has been newly listed worth investing in most coins today are copies of others which have failed. There are no original ideas anymore and most are scams.

There are a lot, maybe you just not explore too much yet. I think there are a lot of new projects gaining success in exchange this year. Most specially NFT, there are a lot NFT based token which gaining more than 100% profit. New projects don't need a pure new idea, they could replace the old idea with a better one as long as it good, it will works

[RbiggerG]

1.project team  There will always be a very large community behind a potential project to promote the success of the project.
2.white paper  Through the white paper, you can learn about many project parties' data, such as transaction volume, currency holding addresses, and the amount of funds in the mining pool.
3.Exchange listing  Many newly-listed tokens will be used on unheard of cryptocurrency exchanges with very low trading volume. If it is listed on Binance, it may be the most anticipated of all projects.

The second point you mentioned regarding the white paper is definitely not a reliable one to judge whether a project is worth investing. It serves as a very rough orientation as to whether you like the direction the project is supposed to once take, the vision. I guess 950 out of 1000 white papers during the ICO mania back in the days have never even been put to practice by 10% of what was written down in those papers. Some of the projects even only got to launch their mainnet and it was game over...

[Ayiranorea]

Analyse the root of the project and the team. When a project is being developed and launched by an established firm or one with a good number of userbase gives the confirmation of growth. This has happened with several projects, and these aren't mere hypes. When such projects get launched it is very hard to participate on the sale, very few get lucky to make profit out of it.

[CaVO32]

The real information of the projects is important and of course the team behind if its genuine or not. Because mostly projects nowadays using fake people behind the project that's why they run the money without any hesitation when something bad happens in the market. So when picking a project bear in mind that you must assure that you have enough information before investing and etc, so that afterwards its worth it not a waste of time.

unfortunately for new investors in my opinion it is still difficult to find information about new coins that have potential because they are still inexperienced, sometimes from the whitepaper they provide they still can't provide a safe guarantee, maybe it can be helped by posting on this forum and asking for help how the response of the project you chose so that the masters who already have a lot of experience can help you decide whether to enter or not.

If you are new, better check first the top crypto. And then, observe how their price changes in the market. But if you want to venture with new coins, better check the foundation of the coin itself. Do they have working platform? Or just talks only? Because some projects are good at marketing their product even if there is no working product. So make sure that there are really active users of their services, because that will be important in the sustenance of their market.

[crzy]

Analyse the root of the project and the team. When a project is being developed and launched by an established firm or one with a good number of userbase gives the confirmation of growth. This has happened with several projects, and these aren't mere hypes. When such projects get launched it is very hard to participate on the sale, very few get lucky to make profit out of it.

The developer is a big help for us to decide whether to buy or not and personally, I do analyze their background and know their plans about the new project because they might already worked with project before, and just created another project just to have more investors. You can also add to your list the price of that new token, know if there’s a hype and if the price is because of being good or someone si manipulating that project.

[mhine07]

Don't you consider how big the community behind it? Remember that if the hype was coming from the community that was spreading the word about the project. The potential or big project will always have a very big community behind it. The communicy was also playing a very important role to make the project became a successful project. This already proven by so many major crypto projects.
A new potential coin will always have a solid community behind it

Yes i agree with this because i experienced it in one of the coins that i invested years ago, that has a great community and eventually the project succeeded. Having a good community to a project is one of the key for their success because many people will help the coin to ve known by many investors that makes many people will join the more investments they have.

[bitkanu]

For around the last year I have not seen one single coin that has been newly listed worth investing in most coins today are copies of others which have failed.

Creating a new tech or innovation was so difficult and it's not easy as you said that dude. So many coins were doing more and more improvements from the old protocols and this is totally needed to be used as a sustainable development to make sure crypto will always evolve from time to the time.

[RbiggerG]

For around the last year I have not seen one single coin that has been newly listed worth investing in most coins today are copies of others which have failed.

Creating a new tech or innovation was so difficult and it's not easy as you said that dude. So many coins were doing more and more improvements from the old protocols and this is totally needed to be used as a sustainable development to make sure crypto will always evolve from time to the time.

At the same time they often claimed to have developed innovative protocols that actually weren't really that innovative because they gave up on some of the other core values like trading efficiency for security or other trade-offs. An innovation to me is at least in the area of crypto when you can keep as much as possible the core values of decentralization and what comes along with it while improving parts of it like scalability. When the first coins came and said hey we can do 1,000,000 tx per second it turned out that they were almost fully centralized. That is not innovation to me.

[seleme]

First checking the team background and looking for feedbacks from other investors. After doing small research I put a small amount for test purposes, if the project can convince me to invest more I will go for it. Otherwise, wasting money doesn't worth seeing how the specific token will perform on markets. After getting the positive feedback on the invested project, you can find the account manager on team and ask for special dicounts if you plan to invest big. At the end of day, it all depends on the investing skills and overall score of the projects.

[coin-investor]

Any investment is risky, so how should we distinguish between empty coin and MLM coin?
Aircoin is a white paper written casually by the project team, and the official website packs and collects money.
MLM tokens are mainly used to obtain reward tokens through pulling heads and offline multi-level development, or to obtain tokens by recharging members of different levels and purchasing virtual mining rights of different levels.

I would like to add the platform, the platform is very important it is what defines a project and its contribution to the industry, without a platform to speak of, the coin will just become a pump and dump coin, so if you are looking for a coin to invest be sure to check if there's a platform and what it's purpose in the community.

[arifteguhr]

Honestly, i lost some of my criteria for now. At past, i only trade coins which listed in big market because they really strict when put a coin in their market. But nowadays even Binance sometime listed coins that only hyped. Well, i then turn back to top Coinmarketcap list.

I don't think the Binance exchange did anything wrong in that either, because they will add all the coins that meet the written criteria for their exchange, and that's very fair in my opinion, because the screening of the Binance exchange is also very strict on all Altcoins

[harizen]

At least, it should have a big community around and their channels should be active.

However, it's just one of the factors. It's really hard to deal with the market volatility even how good and valuable the project is. Maybe just trust them with limitations and try to play with their coins on the market.

DYOR is really the key but the market itself is really hard to challenge.

[lenovop-70]

I will check in the marketcap to find out this coin are worth to buy or not based on the market volume summary, I will also check how many holders are in the smart contract, the two basic things above are some of my many considerations in buying coins. if you don't want the hassle of buying, just go to a big market like Binance, and pick the top three coins to start trading.

[Levero]

1. It can be judged by its white paper, understand the basic currency information from the white paper, and see if there is plagiarism from other projects.
2. Whether it is listed on a large and reputable and well-known exchange, there will be a better future.
3. Know its project team. Information about the team and its previous projects should be public and complete.
4. Whether the future development plan of the project is clear and reasonable.

[tygeade]

Some people usually say that we should all be looking at how big the community of a coin is before you we decide to join and invest in that coin. In this case the op is talking about how to know whether newly listed coins are worth investing in or not, and in this case, since the coin is still new it is not going to have a big community behind it yet. At this point it takes the hard work of the team to keep it flowing, and not the community.

Now this is why it’s important to get to know the team and know how hard they are working towards pushing the coin forward. This matters a lot in the start. As time goes on the coin will then have a big community that is supporting it. It’s just like bitcoin, when it started, it didn’t have a community that is as big as it does now.

[Ziskinberg]

Honestly, it was too hard to predict and to tell that particular project was worth invesing. Even though they look promising and even the team could give assurance but it can't assure anything especially when it was not listed to a known exchanger. As I look for the project if that is worth it or not, I put into consideration if that project has an important role in the market, that something they can give to the community. But for the thousands of new projects that have been created, we can't deny how hard to find them.