Not going to defend Bitget here, with a hundred or so exchanges it's damn hard to find users who have traded on exactly two or three and can compare them side by side. But volume shouldn't be an indicator, with all the news and attention focusing on numbers every single exchange fakes them, some in a smart way, some more obvious.
If we take that list by volume and hide the names I'm sure a lot of people would raise an eyebrow at exchange placed at over 50, with way less volume than some one or two years old exchanges, but I would still trust them than half of the top 10, if we look at the volume we see the ones that survived hacks, reimbursed users and have no problem still operating within the US and EU are down the list while shitty exchanges that in some cases have no office or licenses are claiming to be next generation of that and this.
That being said all my instincts scream stay away from any exchange that claims it has a U.S. MSB License but at the same time tells us:
This Agreement in its entirety is a contract concluded under the laws of the Singapore, and relevant laws of the Singapore shall apply to its establishment, interpretation, content and enforcement; You also unconditionally agree that the venue or competent court for any dispute or problem relating to this Agreement or any claim and proceeding arising from this Agreement shall be exclusively in the Singapore.
Website is operated mostly from Singapore but it's really from China, and it is showing they have license for Canada, Singapore, USA and Australia, but I think that KYC verification and without that you can only withdraw up to 0.1 BTC daily.
The screenshot you've posted says the limit is 20 BTC a day, probably not updated. Also, lol, "the maximum withdrawal amount can't exceed the amount available in your account".Seriously?
No fair!
Ayhow, bottom line, I still think there are better options out there.