How to identify high-quality projects in the primary market?

[anti-dot]

The team members also if possible have identification and they have some way to be reached out to like emails or a LinkedIn profile, most anonymous projects ends up being a rug pull that dupes investors. In terms of investment, they shouldn't ask too big for their investors in my opinion because if it's a legitimate project, they can start small and slowly build up while the funding also goes up.

This is right, teams should have faces because in an anonymous space, you don't want to trust your money on people that doesn't have any faces, you won't be getting anything out of them especially if they started running away from the project. I have seen this kind of projects and they almost always end up in a scam.

So far what I've learned, it's very difficult to find a really quality project. but there is 1 thing I think about, is where the project is advertised. because the place to market the product is very important, not only on bitcointalk but more on crypto related websites such as ico rating or coinmarketcap and others. the reason is if a developer dares to put an ad on the site is that they really want to make a big project and have the capital to start a project.

It's just a part of it in my opinion, being advertised doesn't mean it's a quality project. Remember thatscam projects can be advertised too so you better understand and evaluate what you're saying because it might lead you to the wrong path.

I checked out one project with six team members and not a single linkedin link on the profile pictures worked. I reached out to them and asked what's wrong, so they added two functioning links and removed some of the links of the other profiles. Then I asked whether i could speak in the telegram group to the CTO, just a single question. Or whether they could do an AMA on Youtube. That is like 6 weeks ago and they haven't done it, yet of course claim to be the next big thing. But that happens all the time with projects, on a very frequent basis.

[arwin100]

The team members also if possible have identification and they have some way to be reached out to like emails or a LinkedIn profile, most anonymous projects ends up being a rug pull that dupes investors. In terms of investment, they shouldn't ask too big for their investors in my opinion because if it's a legitimate project, they can start small and slowly build up while the funding also goes up.

This is right, teams should have faces because in an anonymous space, you don't want to trust your money on people that doesn't have any faces, you won't be getting anything out of them especially if they started running away from the project. I have seen this kind of projects and they almost always end up in a scam.

So far what I've learned, it's very difficult to find a really quality project. but there is 1 thing I think about, is where the project is advertised. because the place to market the product is very important, not only on bitcointalk but more on crypto related websites such as ico rating or coinmarketcap and others. the reason is if a developer dares to put an ad on the site is that they really want to make a big project and have the capital to start a project.

It's just a part of it in my opinion, being advertised doesn't mean it's a quality project. Remember thatscam projects can be advertised too so you better understand and evaluate what you're saying because it might lead you to the wrong path.

I checked out one project with six team members and not a single linkedin link on the profile pictures worked. I reached out to them and asked what's wrong, so they added two functioning links and removed some of the links of the other profiles. Then I asked whether i could speak in the telegram group to the CTO, just a single question. Or whether they could do an AMA on Youtube. That is like 6 weeks ago and they haven't done it, yet of course claim to be the next big thing. But that happens all the time with projects, on a very frequent basis.

I don't know if you can talk with high ranking guys in the project if you don't have anything good to offer to their project since mostly the one who talk for them is there community managers but you can seek the answers with your questions to their live AMA sessions so even if they are there showing there real faces still we need to be careful since scammers are now upgrading to gather more money by showing their identities to gather trust to the community they created. So for thinking about investing on this better invest only what you can afford to lose since that is the golden rule in investing.

[jaberwock]

Identifying legit or real projects are very hard to do since most of the projects are scam. You would say that 99% of thise projects are scam and only 1% are legit. Sadly, some of those project are not scam but failed to survive that long.

Yeah, and there is no single website or platform where you can view all the projects either. Some really good ones are strangled because they don't have the money to get those paid listings and continue the development without any support from the community. Then there are meme coins who offer nothing but have the budget to spend millions on marketing and get their token on all these listing and review portals.

It's near impossible to identify which projects are good. Then it's even harder to analyse which ones among these good ones are serious about their idea. If even you pass the two stages, it's impossible to guess which project will despite having a dedicated team and solid idea will be able to draw enough attention from the investors.

[19Nov16]

How to identify high-quality projects in the primary market?
1. The team background of the project,.whether the founding team members have other technical or operational backgrounds related to the blockchain icon project. You can learn about it through official white papers, official websites, communities, and other channels.
2. The investment institution of the project is extremely important. A good project seed will attract the participation of well-known institutions in the circle.
3. The technological innovation of the project, or a simple analogy of similar application projects.

I've been on a lot of projects but I can't be sure if what you're listing is totally worthy of a big project or a quality project, because you're entering this market. . Now that's possible, it's risky and it's like gambling with only a 50% chance of winning and any new project you join could fall prey to them. So the best advice to invest in long-term and quality projects is particularly recognized and popular.

The future is unpredictable, I've followed and invested in projects that looked very good but I got scammed, crypto competition and projects are very tight, so we have to be selective so we don't get scammed.

[LUCKMCFLY]

How to identify high-quality projects in the primary market?
1. The team background of the project,.whether the founding team members have other technical or operational backgrounds related to the blockchain icon project. You can learn about it through official white papers, official websites, communities, and other channels.
2. The investment institution of the project is extremely important. A good project seed will attract the participation of well-known institutions in the circle.
3. The technological innovation of the project, or a simple analogy of similar application projects.

I've been on a lot of projects but I can't be sure if what you're listing is totally worthy of a big project or a quality project, because you're entering this market. . Now that's possible, it's risky and it's like gambling with only a 50% chance of winning and any new project you join could fall prey to them. So the best advice to invest in long-term and quality projects is particularly recognized and popular.

There's always another side as there are investors who willing to take the risk and see if they will find luck investing with hypes

project, after doing your research you can start putting your money and to see if things favor you, if not then move forward and

find another project that will bring you some decent profits.

To know the quality of a project, it is necessary to research and monitor the progress of the project. in other words, we must actively pay attention to every development in the project, when there is something suspicious, it is best to leave the project and look for other projects with more potential to invest, and when the pump occurs, we should immediately get out of the market.

Research is essential for us to be successful with a particular project, but there is a specific point that must be highlighted, which is to know what is the trend towards where the money is moving, for example, at the moment what Most of the investments are being directed towards NFT games, it is not necessary to emphasize that Axie is the example of this, now many games that are under the jurisdiction of AXIE are making a difference with better participation options, that is, you can enter the I play for free and make the money necessary to become premium, and this capitalizes much more, because not only does it encompass the blockchain-based business model, but it encompasses another community as large as that of gamers, so in the gamer world it is it handles a lot of money, and if you combine it with blockchain technology it is a financial explosion, I think that aside from project research, you should look for the trend by which everything is heading.

[Silberman]

Identifying legit or real projects are very hard to do since most of the projects are scam. You would say that 99% of thise projects are scam and only 1% are legit. Sadly, some of those project are not scam but failed to survive that long.

And once you make that realization then there is not reason to try to find those coins, after all one of the big problems with this is that our money is not really infinite, so the chances we have of finding a project like that are very low, not only because the majority of the projects are scams but also because scammers are experts at creating projects that on the outside look like legitimate offers but they have no plans of actually creating anything and will disappear with your money as soon as they have the chance.

[anggoro manise]

#snip#

It's just a part of it in my opinion, being advertised doesn't mean it's a quality project. Remember thatscam projects can be advertised too so you better understand and evaluate what you're saying because it might lead you to the wrong path.

yes it is true, it is indeed one of the many ways to learn a project, what I think by advertising on popular sites is that those who want to start a project have capital. not only want to create a fake project without using capital. maybe it's one of the easiest ways to tag, but there are also a lot of bad projects that appear in ads on popular sites.

[terciduk123]

The future is unpredictable, I've followed and invested in projects that looked very good but I got scammed, crypto competition and projects are very tight, so we have to be selective so we don't get scammed.

It is not easy to find Projects that have good potential, We need a lot of time to find and research many existing projects, need to re-examine every project that seems potential.
When we find a new project with real potential and want to invest, it takes special access - such as a whitelist or lottery winner - to join the token sale. This is really funny, but it's the truth.

How to identify high-quality projects in the primary market?
1. The team background of the project,.whether the founding team members have other technical or operational backgrounds related to the blockchain icon project. You can learn about it through official white papers, official websites, communities, and other channels.
2. The investment institution of the project is extremely important. A good project seed will attract the participation of well-known institutions in the circle.
3. The technological innovation of the project, or a simple analogy of similar application projects.

The 3 things you said are important things to pay attention to in a project, Usually I also pay attention to strategic partnerships. And the most important thing is that we need to make sure that the information they display is true, not fabricated.

[sana54210]

it is indeed one of the many ways to learn a project, what I think by advertising on popular sites is that those who want to start a project have capital. not only want to create a fake project without using capital. maybe it's one of the easiest ways to tag, but there are also a lot of bad projects that appear in ads on popular sites.

I do believe that just because one project has a lot of marketing doesn't mean that it will definitely end up being a good project, but I also believe that a good project without marketing will not grow big neither, even if you end up hearing about it, if others do not hear about it then it doesn't matter. Which is why I believe that marketing is a must, bad or good it has to have big marketing and that is when we can start to look at it differently.

I have seen so many non-scam projects that ended up being absolutely a disaster just because they couldn't do marketing properly. I was even part of a project that should have been basically a top 50 coin and right now it is not even in the top 3000 just because they lack funds and they couldn't do any marketing at all, they are good people building a great thing and nobody knows about it at all.

[Princejebs]

Normally what you listed would have been a good standing ground to identify high quality projects but the developers of most new scam projects nowadays are smarter than you think. The only reason I invest a good amount of money in a project is when it is being listed or the launch is been done in a reputable exchange.

If you want to succeed, stay away from rubbish project, they wouldn't just kill your portfolio, they will damage your experience beyond repair and may not be happy (certainly, no happiness in the end) and you even likely tag crypto as ponzi scheme.
It may not be the case most of the time but investing in coin that are top 10 on the market are best way to free your self from team embarrassment and incompetency.

[ultrloa]

Normally what you listed would have been a good standing ground to identify high quality projects but the developers of most new scam projects nowadays are smarter than you think. The only reason I invest a good amount of money in a project is when it is being listed or the launch is been done in a reputable exchange.

If you want to succeed, stay away from rubbish project, they wouldn't just kill your portfolio, they will damage your experience beyond repair and may not be happy (certainly, no happiness in the end) and you even likely tag crypto as ponzi scheme.
It may not be the case most of the time but investing in coin that are top 10 on the market are best way to free your self from team embarrassment and incompetency.

Exactly there are obvious projects nor investment sites which is not good to invest and its easy to identify them since they are offering a to good to be true offers which is un imaginable profit in short period of time that's why we really need to avoid this and seek for better information about the those other type of good investments. Gladly we have this forum where we can ask fellow member to point out and ask some feedbacks towards the project we are looking for.

[yananda]

in recent years many projects have innovated with new things but most failed because expectations were too high
a good project will be open to supply to the team and others, that way there is nothing to cover up

[anggoro manise]

I have seen so many non-scam projects that ended up being absolutely a disaster just because they couldn't do marketing properly. I was even part of a project that should have been basically a top 50 coin and right now it is not even in the top 3000 just because they lack funds and they couldn't do any marketing at all, they are good people building a great thing and nobody knows about it at all.

Yes, I agree with this. Lots of projects that really want to grow fall apart, but projects that are not serious can actually grow and grow faster. maybe because crypto is anonymous so it's hard for us to see if it's a real project or not. but I look more into marketing in terms of a project. even a few years ago, projects that only shared airdrops could grow even though they would eventually disappear slowly.

[arwin100]

I have seen so many non-scam projects that ended up being absolutely a disaster just because they couldn't do marketing properly. I was even part of a project that should have been basically a top 50 coin and right now it is not even in the top 3000 just because they lack funds and they couldn't do any marketing at all, they are good people building a great thing and nobody knows about it at all.

Yes, I agree with this. Lots of projects that really want to grow fall apart, but projects that are not serious can actually grow and grow faster. maybe because crypto is anonymous so it's hard for us to see if it's a real project or not. but I look more into marketing in terms of a project. even a few years ago, projects that only shared airdrops could grow even though they would eventually disappear slowly.

Well marketing is somehow executed by devs for short term period they only want to have an exposure to the community here so don't make it as a basis since any devs could pay some amount just to advertise their project. Maybe try to look at the developments and if they flow what is written in whitepaper since if they follow what they promise and contuously update the community about their project status with proof then we can say that we are in good one.

[Koro-Sensei]

How to identify high-quality projects in the primary market?
1. The team background of the project,.whether the founding team members have other technical or operational backgrounds related to the blockchain icon project. You can learn about it through official white papers, official websites, communities, and other channels.
2. The investment institution of the project is extremely important. A good project seed will attract the participation of well-known institutions in the circle.
3. The technological innovation of the project, or a simple analogy of similar application projects.

Even if the above mentioned ways to identify good projects were met, still some of them are scams. One of the best thing to find these gems is to have an internal research of project. It includes the track record of the team, their present achievements, marketing and developments that they are promising. You also have to look if the roadmap were properly achieved within its time frame and the tokenomics. Other than that, even if all of the mentioned were met, volatility still occurs. Prices may differ from expectation.

[conected]

How to identify high-quality projects in the primary market?
1. The team background of the project,.whether the founding team members have other technical or operational backgrounds related to the blockchain icon project. You can learn about it through official white papers, official websites, communities, and other channels.
2. The investment institution of the project is extremely important. A good project seed will attract the participation of well-known institutions in the circle.
3. The technological innovation of the project, or a simple analogy of similar application projects.

Even if the above mentioned ways to identify good projects were met, still some of them are scams. One of the best thing to find these gems is to have an internal research of project. It includes the track record of the team, their present achievements, marketing and developments that they are promising. You also have to look if the roadmap were properly achieved within its time frame and the tokenomics. Other than that, even if all of the mentioned were met, volatility still occurs. Prices may differ from expectation.

- Internal is a huge secret of projects, especially members' information, it is really a professional fake market and wait until the real versions confirm that project, we are already fish lying on the cutting board and just waiting to be dissected and fried, the projects also regularly add key members continuously as well as partners, we also think they are serious but it is also a technique of professional actors. Needing more important project documents is also a detail that many fake projects can handle, innate gem only for nobles and adventurers

[Silberman]

Normally what you listed would have been a good standing ground to identify high quality projects but the developers of most new scam projects nowadays are smarter than you think. The only reason I invest a good amount of money in a project is when it is being listed or the launch is been done in a reputable exchange.

If you want to succeed, stay away from rubbish project, they wouldn't just kill your portfolio, they will damage your experience beyond repair and may not be happy (certainly, no happiness in the end) and you even likely tag crypto as ponzi scheme.
It may not be the case most of the time but investing in coin that are top 10 on the market are best way to free your self from team embarrassment and incompetency.

While it is good advice many people are simply never going to follow that advice because when they see the top coins in the market and they see the price they need to pay now and the price they needed to pay a few years ago they think they are making a mistake if they buy now, so they prefer to buy cheap coins thinking they are investing in the next ethereum, but we know that this is very unlikely and by the time they realize the mistake they made there is simply nothing to do except to accept their losses.

[swiftbits]

Identifying legit or real projects are very hard to do since most of the projects are scam. You would say that 99% of thise projects are scam and only 1% are legit. Sadly, some of those project are not scam but failed to survive that long.

That's unfortunate. It's easier to create crypto projects now than when ICOs are thriving; I see big whales teaming up for a project, but planning to go for a safe exit once the project reached its expected success. On the brighter side, most users considering weaker projects for short-term investing, projects with longevity potential are easier to identify once you see their operation. Basing on the original thread is a good starting ground to identify them.

[teosanru]

How to identify high-quality projects in the primary market?
1. The team background of the project,.whether the founding team members have other technical or operational backgrounds related to the blockchain icon project. You can learn about it through official white papers, official websites, communities, and other channels.
2. The investment institution of the project is extremely important. A good project seed will attract the participation of well-known institutions in the circle.
3. The technological innovation of the project, or a simple analogy of similar application projects.

Seriously?  Team members and their faces are sold for just a few hundred dollars. While investment institution is highly risky because what if it's just a pump and dump party which sells the investment immediately after it gets listed. Which means your token will be more or less abandoned in front of manmonth supply in the market. Yes technological innovation is one thing that could be considered as highly important in any project but more than the utility which it serves with that technological innovation is the primary thing to see in any project.

[Fredomago]

How to identify high-quality projects in the primary market?
1. The team background of the project,.whether the founding team members have other technical or operational backgrounds related to the blockchain icon project. You can learn about it through official white papers, official websites, communities, and other channels.
2. The investment institution of the project is extremely important. A good project seed will attract the participation of well-known institutions in the circle.
3. The technological innovation of the project, or a simple analogy of similar application projects.

Seriously?  Team members and their faces are sold for just a few hundred dollars. While investment institution is highly risky because what if it's just a pump and dump party which sells the investment immediately after it gets listed. Which means your token will be more or less abandoned in front of manmonth supply in the market. Yes technological innovation is one thing that could be considered as highly important in any project but more than the utility which it serves with that technological innovation is the primary thing to see in any project.

Good to bring that here, as it seems so easy to determine by using this information but in reality this can just as easily been faked out even if you read all those details inside the project white paper there's no guarantee that those members are for real.

The good addition of the project to the entire market has a better impact when choosing your asset, not just another copy or another upgrade version of the existing project, but something that usable in their chosen fields.

With so many scammers who have deeper knowledge inside this business, setting your standards to much higher ground saves you up being victimized by those people who love running with investors' money.