No one is perfect and anybody can make mistakes

[Rikafip]

So you are saying a tag on dogeporn wouldn't have changed things.

Not that neutral tag wouldn't change anything, but not even negative tag on dogeporn would change anything. Thing is, bounty hunters generally don't care about trivial stuff like that (whether project is scam or not) and the only thing that can persuade them not to join a pure scam is fear of getting account tagged, and even then it only works for those that join signature campaign.

Being a DT, you should leave at minimum a neutral against scam projects[/qupte]
What you fail to understand is that at that time Dogeporn looked like just another useless shitcoin project (like 99% altcoin projects here), but it wasn't tehnically a scam yet. Or maybe you suggest that we should preemptively tag every new altcoin as a scam before they even scam anyone because most likely they will?

[RapTarX]

Right so perhaps do a bit of due diligence next time before choosing a project to be bounty manager for. The project is called Dogeporn.Finance -- its a Binance token with a total supply of 1 QUADRILLION.

If that information alone didn't trigger warning bells in your mind, well why didn't it?

Is there really a reason to trigger warning bells? Why would it be?
Although the name itself was a bit controversial, that doesn't necessarily ensure a scam. There's a project Sexcoin. The project is dead but not a scam. Regarding the supply, it's just the same as the supply of Shiba Inu; supply 1 QUADRILLION & Shiba Inu is standing at #44th position in coinmarketcap. Again, with the same supply, Safemoon is standing at #207th place in coinmarketcap. In my opinion, none of the information provides any info which can be concluded as a scam. But, yeah, as I said once, Royse777 should be more aware of the possible scam project while selecting a project promotion.