G A M B L E R S ❗❗ What are your thoughts on this?

[ReiMomo]

Assume you have $100 and must choose between the two casino versions shown below to turn a proft. Which will you choose?

If I indeed have to choose one of them, I would prefer to pick the first casino. Reason? I think it is due to the variety of its game options, on the first casino they provide lots kind of games I could play so it wouldn't easily get bored on my gambling session. As for the second casino, besides it lacking the variety of its games, it's also quite bothersome to found a good reliable casino these days in order to play that kind of game (PvP) since there's not many casinos provide it.

It is not asking about the variety of games, it is all about which you are preferred. Gamble that against the house edge or gamble with the real opponent through P2P or player to player games. In poker games, I rather like or choose the p2p gambling that did not against the house edge because there is a possibility that you will increase your potential of winnings. In my own, it depends where did you prefer to use it. Against the house edge of P2P games, all we wanted to have is the entertainment on gambling, not the serious profit that could get.

[South Park]

I've always disliked online casinos because of their algorithms, which cause the odds to be stacked against you, but playing against humans who aren't connected to the platform is much more enjoyable because I'm pretty sure we all have the same odds.

Just be careful, just because you are playing against humans that doesn't mean that there could not be something going on, for example one of the great problems of playing poker online is that two or more people can decide to play as a team on the same table, this means that they have more chances of getting good cards than the ones that you have which means that if you are playing against them you're most likely going to lose.

I agree. However, your remark made me wonder how blackjack dealers can make a profit while playing against thousands of people?

They have the house edge on their side, so even if you play the perfect basic strategy you still have no chance of making profits over the long term and the number of players does not matter even if they decide to play as a team if the only thing they are using is the basic strategy, however this changes if people use card counting, blackjack dealers know about this so if they see you are card counting you are going to be asked to get out of the casino, however if under those circumstances people use team play that is when they can beat the casino while playing blackjack.

[timerland]

Casino A all the way.

I don't have the patience to have to play against others or to have to train up myself before I can play the Peer vs Peer brand of the game.

And I think that generally, when people want to gamble, they are simply seeking a quick entertainment and not anything extended. They don't want to have to install an app, enter a training tutorial, and wait for people to come online.

[Ryker1]

Well it does not matter --P2P games or against on the house are the same thing as entertainment or perhaps the purpose is to have entertainment while you are in gambling not typically about the money. If I have $100 to start in gambling, perhaps dice and roulette would be better, and then P2P like blackjack and poker games also I have preferred. Perhaps, I always preferred a gambling site that I enjoyed the variety of games, it seems when you enter a gambling casino, there are a lot of games that you can choose from.

[Oilacris]

Casino A all the way.

I don't have the patience to have to play against others or to have to train up myself before I can play the Peer vs Peer brand of the game.

And I think that generally, when people want to gamble, they are simply seeking a quick entertainment and not anything extended. They don't want to have to install an app, enter a training tutorial, and wait for people to come online.

Oh among the things been said on here this is the first thing i do hear out on someones who do choses up Option A - Casino A. .You do actually have some point though because majority of gamblers are really that impatient when it comes to games that theyre dealing with and thats why we do see some demand into those dice and slot games out there which do offer instantaneous results.

Its actually a matter of preference because some do like to play strategic type of games and some doesnt really matter at all as long the results are instant or can be known without needing to wait up longer.

Knowing that gamblers are really way too impatient when it comes to gambling where some doesnt really like on waiting up for that long and want fast results.

[sikke]

I think that Casino B is more attractive to me due to the community engagement aspect.

However, I can see why most people would still default to Casino A.

People like consistency and knowing that they're always going to get a provably fair outcome despite the lower odds of winning that they may have. You have to understand that when you do your R&D in this space. Perhaps include a play against house option alongside your option B?

[Wakate]

I would rather compete with my fellow gamblers to be lucky to win a bet. It is very difficult to win against the house cause the house has different ways to make sure that the game is out of the hand if the gamblers. Winning against the house with a big success can be as a result of high altitude luck that might have tricked the house of possible outcomes.

[coin-investor]

I play on luck so my choice is on option number 1 most of my activities on gambling sites are luck-based I love playing on luck games because I'm not good at games that require skills and concentration it's time-consuming to try how to learn various skills on Poker, Blackjack and besides I have good success in luck-based games.

[lienfaye]

And I think that generally, when people want to gamble, they are simply seeking a quick entertainment and not anything extended. They don't want to have to install an app, enter a training tutorial, and wait for people to come online.

Well thats true, some gamblers prefer to play games that purely rely on luck. Special skills are not needed whom gamblers dont also want to learn first before they can able to play. Its a bit hassle since you only want is to enjoy the game and hoping to earn. But still, I prefer games which require skills because you are not only relying on luck but you can also apply what you have learn through experience on playing that particular game.

[Shamm]

For me I'll rather choose B  than A cause  in the Casino B which mean that  you can win by  your skills and luck than Casino A waiting for your luck to win the game. In Casino B you have carry your victory by your skills of you are good and have greater ideas than the other player  you probably win the game.

[tabas]

For me I'll rather choose B  than A cause  in the Casino B which mean that  you can win by  your skills and luck than Casino A waiting for your luck to win the game. In Casino B you have carry your victory by your skills of you are good and have greater ideas than the other player  you probably win the game.

That also means that you have to be better than the other gamblers.
I think it is also better if there will be the choice that you can be against the house in skilled manner but that's unlikely.

[Shamm]

For me I'll rather choose B  than A cause  in the Casino B which mean that  you can win by  your skills and luck than Casino A waiting for your luck to win the game. In Casino B you have carry your victory by your skills of you are good and have greater ideas than the other player  you probably win the game.

That also means that you have to be better than the other gamblers.
I think it is also better if there will be the choice that you can be against the house in skilled manner but that's unlikely.

 Yes that's what I mean for my own strategy that it is better to used skill and competing other opponent there's a big possible to win than to wait our lucky time so I choose casino B . Besides that we can practice and enhanced our skill to be more good in the game for me that's the advantage for the casino B.

[mindrust]

I would rather compete against the other players. (In your example it is "casino B") It is because it is almost certain that you are going to lose against the house. ("casino A") But people on the other hand can be dumb sometimes (that includes you too) unlike the house. It means you can win more often against the real players.

However, I haven't looked at how "casino B" really operates but I assume that it also gets his share from the players because otherwise the casino wouldn't be able to make profits. If casino B provides this platform for the players, they have to take something from the players, unless they get their money from the ad givers which is very unlikely. So, in any case, the casino still always wins whether it is casino A or Casino B.

[Beparanf]

1. Casino A:
Players in this casino compete against the platform (house) in games such as BlackJack, Rollet, Slots, etc... .
In this type of casino, players must rely on luck and other factors to make a profit.

2. Casino B:
Players in this casino compete against each others in games such as Ludo, Poker, Rummy, etc... .
In this type of casino, players rely on their luck and skills to make a profit.
There is only one winner in each game (Ludo: first place, Poker/Rummy: last man standing).

I would go with type A casinos and I know it's not a common opinion but the reasoning behind choosing a luck-based casino where we compete against house edge is the lower edge. I have seen that in most platforms and games where a dealer is involved or players play among themselves, the platform charges hefty fees for that and that's much higher than the usual house edge.

If the house edge & platform commission are the same, then no doubt I would play multiplayer games because it's much more fun and engaging while also a good chance to show off the skills and make some money.

The reason it has a high house edge is to cover operating cost since they don't have any source of income compared when the house is directly playing to players. There's a pros and cons in both option and it solely depends on the skills of the player. If the player has good skill per se poker then it will be good for him to play against other players instead against House even the house edge is much bigger, In the end he will have huge profit for his skill advantage which he can't use if he play against the house.

But only few casino will offer a pure Player to Player game due to a lot competition out there. Imagine a huge operating cost for a small profit on house edge which you can't guarantee if many people will play on your table.

[Natsuu]

Assume you have $100 and must choose between the two casino versions shown below to turn a proft. Which will you choose?

-----

Depending on my mood, but most likely I would choose B as for I love playing using my skills and its more fun. But in some days, that you don't want to think and just waste down some money... I would probably go for A

[molsewid]

Yes that's what I mean for my own strategy that it is better to used skill and competing other opponent there's a big possible to win than to wait our lucky time so I choose casino B . Besides that we can practice and enhanced our skill to be more good in the game for me that's the advantage for the casino B.

Actually in gambling it's very rewarding if you got to end winning either you win depending on your luck or win depending on your strategy and we do have our own choices which one do we like to play with that could be most entertain for us. But I am a type of a gambler that wanted to win in a competition like using my skills and wanted to develop more strategy so that winning in this kind of gambling will be more rewarding for ma so that's why I choose casino B than casino A.

[rodskee]

I love to gamble against other person and not against computer , this makes me more competitive and aware of the situation that just playing online or against programmed game.

actually before pandemic i constantly go to a friends house just to gamble and only visiting crypto gambling site whenever i succeed in trading or received my payments from bounty/campaigns.

so obviously i will choose the one that is not totally an online gambling.

[Shamm]

Actually in gambling it's very rewarding if you got to end winning either you win depending on your luck or win depending on your strategy and we do have our own choices which one do we like to play with that could be most entertain for us. But I am a type of a gambler that wanted to win in a competition like using my skills and wanted to develop more strategy so that winning in this kind of gambling will be more rewarding for ma so that's why I choose casino B than casino A.

  Yeah it's true Gambling is rewarding but it's depends also if we know how to play the game , that's why as a Gamblers we need to practice our skills to make more advanced and competing other opponent it's more likely to play with them cause it makes fun while playing in the Gambling.

[smyslov]

Both are good and you have a chance to win on both, but there are too many risks playing in poker I'm not a good poker player I only play poker with my friends and I lose many times and to think of my friends are not good on poker too, so I have to go for option number 1 which is relying on luck to make a profit.

[boyptc]

Both are good and you have a chance to win on both, but there are too many risks playing in poker I'm not a good poker player I only play poker with my friends and I lose many times and to think of my friends are not good on poker too,

I'm also not a good poker because I can be that emotional when there's a streak that I've got no good hands.

so I have to go for option number 1 which is relying on luck to make a profit.

This is also hard, you're going to depend on your luck if you target for the profit. It's a hard choice if you're for the profit.