Advanced settings for dice bets

[Saint-loup]

Has advance settings for Dice any positive influence on the dice game for the gamblers? If your answer is no of what benefits then are looking for gambling site that has advance settings for Dice bets. I do dice on Stake.com and others gambling site that doesn't have advance settings but I don't really see any difference in my opinion and experience so far.

When people encounter a good streak, they usually think they will encounter a bad streak after it. And it's the same thing in the opposite way, then they use the autobetting mode to bet on the next X long streak instead of betting on just the next roll.

Depending on someones decisions or perception because some does have different impression on such situation whether you do go completely in manual or in auto mode.
When it comes to dice settings then this is something where most people believe that they could really make some advantage but once the reality slap out into their faces
then this is where they do have bad impressions about it or would know on how reality works.

But why would people think they will get some advantages by using auto betting mode if it's not because they want to bet on long series instead of betting on only one round?

Just like on what you do saw on martingale.Its a series of long bets and you do see on how those losses becomes a profit after a certain win which it do really poke out your greed and you do see it as an interesting.

There are people who dont simply like long sessions in their dice gaming but instead make out some bets in one go with specific odds been set.Some doesnt like long wait and just
bet directly in one go and if they won then they do continue and if they lose then completely stop or would make out some deposits again.

You didn't reply to my question. Why would people think they will get some advantages by using auto betting mode according to you if it's not because they want to bet on long series instead of betting on only one round? I don't think most of people use martingales in auto betting mode because it's highly dangerous, you can lose all your bankroll very quickly if you encounter a bad losing streak.

[1715595581]

1715595581

[South Park]

Hello everyone, I know 3 cryptocurrency casinos that have advanced settings for automatic bets in the dice game, the casinos I am talking about are Stake, Primedice and Wolf, when I talk about advanced settings I mean that we can configure streaks, change of side and probability of winning, apart from the 3 casinos that I mentioned that have such game configurations in others that only have simple configurations for dice game, a casino that only has simple configurations is BC Game, I would like to know if there is any way to use advanced settings at BC Game or any other casino that does not have advanced settings.

What's the point of doing all of this?

You're going to stress yourself out trying to figure out a strategy that ultimately just won't work.

If anything you're just going to be losing money faster given that autobetting is essentially accelerating the amount of volume that you wager over a time period. Go for it if that's what you want, but it's not a way to profit that's for sure.

As you have deduced there is no point to doing something like this, the negative EV is not going to improve by changing our progression or our betting patterns which means that the faster you bet the faster you lose your money, but at the end of the day it is their time and their money and they can do whatever they want with it, however if someone wants to have a chance to earn money with gambling then they should try games in which your EV can turn positive and play games like dice only for the entertainment they get out of it.

[dunfida]

Hello everyone, I know 3 cryptocurrency casinos that have advanced settings for automatic bets in the dice game, the casinos I am talking about are Stake, Primedice and Wolf, when I talk about advanced settings I mean that we can configure streaks, change of side and probability of winning, apart from the 3 casinos that I mentioned that have such game configurations in others that only have simple configurations for dice game, a casino that only has simple configurations is BC Game, I would like to know if there is any way to use advanced settings at BC Game or any other casino that does not have advanced settings.

What's the point of doing all of this?

You're going to stress yourself out trying to figure out a strategy that ultimately just won't work.

If anything you're just going to be losing money faster given that autobetting is essentially accelerating the amount of volume that you wager over a time period. Go for it if that's what you want, but it's not a way to profit that's for sure.

As you have deduced there is no point to doing something like this, the negative EV is not going to improve by changing our progression or our betting patterns which means that the faster you bet the faster you lose your money, but at the end of the day it is their time and their money and they can do whatever they want with it, however if someone wants to have a chance to earn money with gambling then they should try games in which your EV can turn positive and play games like dice only for the entertainment they get out of it.

I dont really consider any gambling game for it to be a source of income or give out assurance for you to make money but rather this thing is really just good for entertainment nothingless.

Its just people do really end up on having these kind of impressions on where they do really believe that they could really have some advantage if they do tend to make use of number of strategies.

They would only realize that it wont really gonna work no matter how hard they would gonna do.

[Smartvirus]

Do these configurations or settings actually works? Especially when it comes to games of luck or high probability games becuase, I really feel it doesn't and in the  end, it's the houses programming on the games that still stands. You can imagine the house actually  allowing a settings in its program that would be against the house. Its most likely never to happen and one would be left thinking him or herself smart  over a few turns and a few lucks. I think it's just the same thing so long as, it ain't no constant!

[Betwrong]

~
If we are talking about the end result, then of course it is the same everywhere - the loss of bankroll.

Yes, even our universe will lose its bankroll and die eventually.

But with gambling simulation it's interesting, imo, to work with a number of bets that realistically could be made during our lifetime.

But if we consider the path that leads to this result, then it is fundamentally different for different strategies. For example, the classic Martingale draws a graph that grows steadily (with rare spikes down) and this growth ends unexpectedly - one of the spikes clears the bankroll.

The bankroll wouldn't be cleared with that spike if more money were in it. So, it's important to know the initial bet size and the size of the bankroll which was cleared with a certain amount of bets, while using a certain strategy.

I mean, without real numbers it's hard to imagine the outcome of this or that strategy. That's what I think, at least.

But would turn out that people would already get used to be bored whenever they are tending to test up for hundred millions of bets just to know on whats the outcome.As you said that
house edge would really be there as always and outcome would just still end up the same thats why im not really interested on testing up countless numbers of possible strategies or
arrangement or settings when it comes to dicing because it would really just give out the same results if you do tend to do it on longer times.

Usually simulations are not done by humans, so the "to be bored" part can be excluded.
As of the results, well, if the number of bets is a factor, they might be very different for different strategies.

~ Unfortunately naive gamblers to get deceived to such extra settings by believing into promotions and other gambler's recommendations.

I strongly agree with this. Gambling should be for fun, not for making money. However, if your bankroll is insignificant, you can be as naive as you want, and lose it all with this or that strategy, and it won't be a tragedy for you, you'll just get your entertainment.

[michellee]

Do these configurations or settings actually works? Especially when it comes to games of luck or high probability games becuase, I really feel it doesn't and in the  end, it's the houses programming on the games that still stands. You can imagine the house actually  allowing a settings in its program that would be against the house. Its most likely never to happen and one would be left thinking him or herself smart  over a few turns and a few lucks. I think it's just the same thing so long as, it ain't no constant!

It is hard to say if that configuration or setting will work for many gamblers because the situations will not be the same as when one gambler uses that setting. Maybe the setting will work for one or two gamblers, but once again, we need to modify the setting and search for what setting can work for us. Or maybe that setting can help us win for some time but if we still use the same setting, I think that will not work because the casino can change their algorithm anytime.

[KTChampions]

But if we consider the path that leads to this result, then it is fundamentally different for different strategies. For example, the classic Martingale draws a graph that grows steadily (with rare spikes down) and this growth ends unexpectedly - one of the spikes clears the bankroll.

The bankroll wouldn't be cleared with that spike if more money were in it. So, it's important to know the initial bet size and the size of the bankroll which was cleared with a certain amount of bets, while using a certain strategy.

I mean, without real numbers it's hard to imagine the outcome of this or that strategy. That's what I think, at least.

The bankroll will be emptied anyway, as it cannot hold an infinite amount of money.
Maybe some strategies are difficult to calculate analytically the average number of bets made that will lead you to zero your bankroll, but with Martingel, for example, everything is quite simple:
For example, you have 10,000 minimum bets, if after a loss you double your bet, then a series of 14 losses will kill your deposit.
How many bets can you make before this event? It's 2^N+1−2 (where N=14)
So, on average, you will have time to make 32766 bets before you encounter such a series and nullify your deposit.