definitely if I were the president of a country I would not negotiate with them until they show a change of behavior and are democratic and respect human and people's rights. It's not fair to keep making people dress based on religion, those are just religious fanatical shits and terrorists, I don't understand why they weren't wiped from the face of the earth. the world needs to get rid of leaders who rule on the basis of religion and religious fanaticism, this is a great cancer for the world. We already have big problems with the greedy corrupt who are profiting from wars in other countries, but the religious fanatics are worse because their war never ends, it becomes tiresome
I totally oppose your opinion, and find justified the means of war to oppose it.
you speak about democratic, respect and people's right, and still deny it to the talibans and afghans, and most generally to literal islam worldwide.
you seek to impose, or more exactly, genocide those who oppose your values, furthermore you are insulting to your self and them.
moreover, terrorism is just a tactic. you can't reduce those using a tactic to the said tactic.
if tiresome to you, it means that you simply have less faith in what you profess, than the other side, you seek to dominate.
I love integrist or "fanatical" religious particants or back to the source because they stand proudly in the face of any nwo or one world gov (owg) project that you may in reality wish to impose on the world... I am specially found on Islam, because when Islam flexes, the world better bent... and as you understand the duration of the fight is quite irrelevant, specially for those seeking the path of death for Islam... and if you understand what I am trying to say beyond those words it means to seek death by serving God's Will... any better way to die?
then I don't understand what the fuck has a "president of a country" to do with market praticipants? you want BTC txs of talibans to be censored? no one forces you to trade with the talibans if you wish so... what is this servile and domesticated
attitude to have to seek "approval" from the executive a country before engaging in trading relation on market? are you a statist beyond a genocidist and hegemonist?
another thing I love about religious text based fanaticks, is that they don't change their laws at the whim of financial, political or geopolitical interests. they are constant, and as such predictable. when they say, it's forbidden on their markets, it will remain as much as what is legal will. I love that.
finally I think the real problem is election integrity, and the building of informed consent (the capture of the 4th estate, medias), making any form of democracy, impossible right now. And I guess you are a symptom of this intolerant hive mind, no opposition, only one narrative, never hear or even worst aknowledge dissenting voices, be it in politics or even science right now, at least your kinds are too weak and stupid to interfer in market operations... and as you are soo poorly educated, we need 2 sides... or to buy, or to sell... intolerable isn't it for a "el presidente"...
and a question how do you call the paste made from poppy flowers before refining? is there price arbitrage in afghanistan of such highly natural and potent product?
