I wouldn't give a second thought to Neopets, NFTs, or any of those sideshow distractions. Support real cryptocurrency (like bitcoin) and either get involved in politics directly or make your voice heard to the politicians now in power. If you don't, you'll regret it, believe me.
That is equal to saying that we shouldn't waste water on a house fire because the Amazon is ablaze.
While I agree with the fact that the NFT market is at best filled with charlatans, it would be a stretch to say that situations like what happened with Neopets
are "sideshow distractions".
The reason why there is so "much outrage and cohesion" with these issues is that the targets don't have the ability to wipe your existence and the
existence of others with the natural ease of a muscle twitching.
But the more substantial reason is that unlike the "economic policies that are surely going to wreck the countries in which we live", there is a way to measure the success of the measures taken.
For the example of the NFTs, it is simple: get the company to take down them and say sorry.
In contrast, it is difficult to judge whether certain economic policies are successful or not as there are many, many criteria to choose from.
Leader: We have done it, we had saved the economy
Economist: Sire, you had destroyed half of the country doing so and 90% of the population is still starving.
No wonder when faced with such large problems, people would rather "continue staring at their phones".
This is thus why I respectfully disagree with the quoted statement above.